Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LUCIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Lucic v. Croatia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LUCIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11
• EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 5699/11

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  However, the domestic authorities must take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 78, Series A no. 146); which means that they should actively search for the witnesses (see Rachdad v. France, no. 71846/01, § 24, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 29881/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  The Court further notes that the domestic courts, in their assessment of evidence, should have given the necessary weight to the fact that J.N."s statement was admitted into evidence without hearing her directly and should have approached such evidence with a particular caution (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 157; and Sievert v. Germany, no. 29881/07, § 64, 19 July 2012).
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  S.N. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  It accepts that in such cases certain measures may be taken for the purpose of protecting the victim, provided that they can be reconciled with an adequate and effective exercise of the rights of the defence (see, amongst many others, S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V, Zdravko Petrov v. Bulgaria, no. 20024/04, § 35, 23 June 2011).

• EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 2775/07

  RUDNICHENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  The preliminary question for the Court to examine in the present case is whether there was a good reason for admitting J.N."s statement in evidence without having her questioned at the trial (see Rudnichenko v. Ukraine, no. 2775/07, § 104, 11 July 2013).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 8088/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  In these circumstances, and having in mind that throughout the proceedings the applicant insisted on J.N."s questioning, the Court does not consider that the applicant waived his right to question the witness (see, among many others, Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 85, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 61800/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  Accordingly, the Court finds that neither the applicant nor his lawyer were given an opportunity to confront and question J.N. or to have her orally examined in the applicant's presence at any stage of the proceedings (see Nechto v. Russia, no. 24893/05, § 125, 24 January 2012; and Vronchenko, cited above, § 65; and contrast Chmura v. Poland, no. 18475/05, § 56, 3 April 2012; Gani v. Spain, no. 61800/08, § 48, 19 February 2013; and Aigner, cited above, § 41).
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 24893/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  Accordingly, the Court finds that neither the applicant nor his lawyer were given an opportunity to confront and question J.N. or to have her orally examined in the applicant's presence at any stage of the proceedings (see Nechto v. Russia, no. 24893/05, § 125, 24 January 2012; and Vronchenko, cited above, § 65; and contrast Chmura v. Poland, no. 18475/05, § 56, 3 April 2012; Gani v. Spain, no. 61800/08, § 48, 19 February 2013; and Aigner, cited above, § 41).
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 18475/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  Accordingly, the Court finds that neither the applicant nor his lawyer were given an opportunity to confront and question J.N. or to have her orally examined in the applicant's presence at any stage of the proceedings (see Nechto v. Russia, no. 24893/05, § 125, 24 January 2012; and Vronchenko, cited above, § 65; and contrast Chmura v. Poland, no. 18475/05, § 56, 3 April 2012; Gani v. Spain, no. 61800/08, § 48, 19 February 2013; and Aigner, cited above, § 41).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  Exceptions to this principle are possible but must not infringe the rights of the defence, which, as a rule, require that the accused should be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when that witness makes his statement or at a later stage of the proceedings (see Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 51, Reports 1997-III, and Lucà v. Italy, no. 33354/96, § 39, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 28328/03

  AIGNER v. AUSTRIA
• RG, 05.06.1905 - 27/05

  1. Unter welchen Voraussetzungen erfüllt das Entgehen eines Gewinnes im …
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 4260/04

  ANDRUSHKO v. RUSSIA
• EKMR, 07.05.1985 - 10626/83

  KELLY v. the UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 77116/01

  BAYBORA and OTHERS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 21.11.2002 - 36747/02

  ARSLAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.10.2012 - 18027/05

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen