Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof

  Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība / Kommission

  (fremdsprachig)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof

  Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība / Kommission

  (fremdsprachig)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensdokumentation)

Verfahrensgang

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-414/08
• EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08 DEP, T-420/08 DEP, T-442/08 DEP

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (24)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-442/08

  Das Gericht erklärt die Entscheidung der Kommission, mit der eine …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  In Joined Cases T-414/08 DEP to T-420/08 DEP and T-442/08 DEP,.

  applicant in Case T-442/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

  12 By eight applications lodged at the Court Registry on 20 August 2014, the intervener submitted, on the basis of Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of 2 May 1991, eight applications for taxation of costs by which it requested that the Court set the recoverable costs to be reimbursed by the Commission at the following amounts: EUR 16 058.70 (comprising EUR 15 903.26 for lawyers' fees and EUR 155.44 for disbursements) in Case T-442/08; EUR 14 058.70 (comprising EUR 13 903.26 for lawyers' fees and EUR 155.44 for disbursements) in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08.

  14 By order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 29 June 2015, after hearing the parties, Cases T-414/08 DEP to T-420/08 DEP and T-442/08 DEP were joined for the purposes of the present order, on account of the connection between them, in accordance with Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure of 2 May 1991.

  15 The intervener states that the amount of fees for which it claims reimbursement corresponds to a total number of 256 hours of work, namely approximately 36 hours of work in Case T-442/08 and 31.5 hours of work in each of the seven other cases in the main proceedings.

  16 The intervener explains that that amount covers, inter alia, the following work: reviewing the contested decision; drafting and submitting eight applications for leave to intervene and eight statements in intervention; drafting and submitting observations on the defendant's plea of inadmissibility in Case T-442/08; reviewing the Commission's defence and observations on the statements in intervention; responding to the questions of the Court in Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08; preparing and attending three hearings; reviewing and analysing the judgments of 12 April 2013 in order to consider the merits of an appeal.

  Consequently, it proposes to divide by eight the total amount of fees and disbursements invoiced by its lawyers, except for the costs incurred in submitting the statement in intervention on the plea of inadmissibility (corresponding to EUR 2 000 for five hours of work) which are specific to Case T-442/08.

  However, in its opinion, that additional step should not give rise in recoverable costs, since it was not necessary for the intervener to make submissions on the admissibility of CISAC's action in Case T-442/08 as the seven other cases in the main proceedings were clearly admissible.

  48 In the present case, as regards the lawyers' fees, the intervener indicated that they correspond to a total number of 256 hours dedicated to dealing with the eight cases in the main proceedings, that is approximately 36 hours of work in Case T-442/08 and 31.5 hours of work in each of the seven other cases in the main proceedings.

  It should also be noted that in Case T-442/08, the intervener was represented by two lawyers at the hearing of 19 October 2011 and by one lawyer at the hearing of 4 June 2012.

  57 Therefore, the Court considers that a fair assessment of all the fees recoverable by the intervener in considering, for purposes of calculating the necessary fees incurred by the intervener for the eight cases in the main proceedings, is that the disputes required work of 129 hours, that is to say, 24 hours in Case T-442/08 and 15 hours in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08, the remuneration of which, by applying the hourly rate of EUR 300 which the Court considers appropriate in the present case, must be assessed at EUR 38 700 for all the eight cases in the main proceedings, that is to say, EUR 7 200 in Case T-442/08 and EUR 4 500 in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08.

  63 In that regard, it should be noted, first, that, besides the fact that an application for taxation of costs is of a fairly standardised nature (order of 10 October 2013 in CPVO v Schräder, C-38/09 P-DEP, EU:C:2013:679, paragraph 42 and the case-law cited), and is characterised in principle by the absence of any difficulty, the applications for the taxation of costs brought by the intervener in the eight joined cases are absolutely identical except for the reference, in Case T-442/08 DEP, to the response to the Commission's objections on the question of admissibility.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-420/08

  Zdruzenje skladateljev, avtorjev in zaloznikov za zascito avtorskih pravic …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  In Joined Cases T-414/08 DEP to T-420/08 DEP and T-442/08 DEP,.

  applicant in Case T-420/08,.

  intervener in Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  5 By order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 11 October 2011, Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08 were joined for the purposes of the oral part of the procedure.

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

  In Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08, the Court dismissed the remainder of the applicants' actions.

  12 By eight applications lodged at the Court Registry on 20 August 2014, the intervener submitted, on the basis of Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of 2 May 1991, eight applications for taxation of costs by which it requested that the Court set the recoverable costs to be reimbursed by the Commission at the following amounts: EUR 16 058.70 (comprising EUR 15 903.26 for lawyers' fees and EUR 155.44 for disbursements) in Case T-442/08; EUR 14 058.70 (comprising EUR 13 903.26 for lawyers' fees and EUR 155.44 for disbursements) in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08.

  14 By order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 29 June 2015, after hearing the parties, Cases T-414/08 DEP to T-420/08 DEP and T-442/08 DEP were joined for the purposes of the present order, on account of the connection between them, in accordance with Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure of 2 May 1991.

  16 The intervener explains that that amount covers, inter alia, the following work: reviewing the contested decision; drafting and submitting eight applications for leave to intervene and eight statements in intervention; drafting and submitting observations on the defendant's plea of inadmissibility in Case T-442/08; reviewing the Commission's defence and observations on the statements in intervention; responding to the questions of the Court in Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08; preparing and attending three hearings; reviewing and analysing the judgments of 12 April 2013 in order to consider the merits of an appeal.

  The same is true of the work carried out as a result of the joining of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08 for the purposes of the oral part of the procedure, which allowed the intervener to submit a single response to the Court's written questions and without doubt facilitated its lawyers' preparation for and participation in the hearings.

  Moreover, in Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08, the intervener was represented by one lawyer at the joint hearing on 4 June 2012 and did not participate in the hearing on 20 October 2011.

  57 Therefore, the Court considers that a fair assessment of all the fees recoverable by the intervener in considering, for purposes of calculating the necessary fees incurred by the intervener for the eight cases in the main proceedings, is that the disputes required work of 129 hours, that is to say, 24 hours in Case T-442/08 and 15 hours in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08, the remuneration of which, by applying the hourly rate of EUR 300 which the Court considers appropriate in the present case, must be assessed at EUR 38 700 for all the eight cases in the main proceedings, that is to say, EUR 7 200 in Case T-442/08 and EUR 4 500 in each of Cases T-414/08 to T-420/08.

• EuG, 28.06.2004 - T-342/99

  Airtours / Kommission - Kostenfestsetzung - Honorar der Solicitors und Barristers …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  It follows from that provision that recoverable costs are limited, first, to those incurred for the purpose of the proceedings before the Court and, second, to those which were necessary for that purpose (order of 28 June 2004 in Airtours v Commission, T-342/99 DEP, ECR, EU:T:2004:192, paragraph 13 and the case-law cited).

  When ruling on an application for taxation of costs, the Court is not obliged to take account of any national scale of lawyers' fees or any agreement in that regard between the party concerned and his agents or advisers (order in Airtours v Commission, cited in paragraph 32 above, EU:T:2004:192, paragraph 17 and the case-law cited).

  34 It has also consistently been held that, in the absence of EU provisions laying down fee-scales, the Court must make an unfettered assessment of the facts of the case, taking into account the purpose and nature of the proceedings, their significance from the point of view of EU law as well as the difficulties presented by the case, the amount of work generated by the proceedings for the agents and advisers involved and the financial interests which the parties had in the proceedings (order in Airtours v Commission, cited in paragraph 32 above, EU:T:2004:192, paragraph 18 and the case-law cited).

  In that regard, the ability of the Court to assess the value of work carried out is dependent on the accuracy of the information provided (order in Airtours v Commission, cited in paragraph 32 above, EU:T:2004:192, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-418/08

  Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílum hudebním o. s. (OSA) gegen Europäische …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  applicant in Case T-418/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-419/08

  Lietuvos autoriu teisiu gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A) gegen …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  applicant in Case T-419/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-417/08

  Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL gegen Europäische Kommission.

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  applicant in Case T-417/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-415/08

  Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd gegen Europäische Kommission.

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  applicant in Case T-415/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-416/08

  Eesti Autorite Ühing gegen Europäische Kommission.

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  applicant in Case T-416/08,.

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  1 By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 29 September and 3 October 2008, the Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība, the Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd, the Eesti Autorite Ühing, the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL, the Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA), the Lietuvos autorių teisių gynimo asociacijos agentūra (LATGA-A), the Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (SAZAS) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) ('the applicants') brought eight actions, registered at the Court Registry, respectively, under numbers T-414/08, T-415/08, T-416/08, T-417/08, T-418/08, T-419/08, T-420/08 and T-442/08 ('the cases in the main proceedings'), seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 - ClSAC) ('the contested decision' or 'Decision C(2008) 3435 final').

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuG, 12.04.2013 - T-414/08

  Autortiesibu un komunicesanas konsultaciju agentūra/Latvijas Autoru …

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  APPLICATIONS for taxation of costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) following the judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188),.

  7 By judgments of 12 April 2013 in Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (T-414/08, EU:T:2013:174), Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (T-415/08, EU:T:2013:175), Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (T-416/08, EU:T:2013:176), Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (T-417/08, EU:T:2013:177), OSA v Commission (T-418/08, EU:T:2013:178), LATGA-A v Commission (T-419/08, EU:T:2013:179), SAZAS v Commission (T-420/08, EU:T:2013:180) and CISAC v Commission (T-442/08, ECR, EU:T:2013:188), the Court (Sixth Chamber) upheld the applicants' actions and, therefore, annulled Article 3 of the contested decision in so far as it concerned them.

• EuGH, 06.01.2004 - C-104/89

  Mulder u.a. / Rat und Kommission

  Auszug aus EuG, 18.09.2015 - T-414/08

  Therefore, the work relating to that coordination cannot be taken into account in the estimate of hours worked which were objectively necessary for the purpose of the proceedings (order of 6 January 2004 in Mulder and Others v Council and Commission, C-104/89 DEP, ECR, EU:C:2004:1, paragraph 64 and the case-law cited).
• EuGH, 10.10.2013 - C-38/09

  CPVO / Schräder - Kostenfestsetzung
• EuGH, 04.07.2013 - C-75/05

  Kronofrance / Deutschland u.a. - Kostenfestsetzung
• EuG, 08.11.2001 - T-65/96

  Kish Glass / Kommission - "Kostenfestsetzung - Für das Verfahren notwendige …
• EuG, 06.03.2003 - T-226/00

  Nan Ya Plastics / Rat - Kostenfestsetzung
• EuG, 31.03.2011 - T-5/02

  Tetra Laval / Kommission
• EuG, 30.09.2003 - T-346/02

  Cableuropa u.a. / Kommission
• EuG, 24.01.2002 - T-38/95

  Groupe Origny / Kommission - Kostenfestsetzung
• EuG, 06.10.2011 - T-388/02

  Kronoply und Kronotex / Kommission - Verfahren - Kostenfestsetzung
• EuG, 20.11.2012 - T-121/09

  Al Shanfari / Rat und Kommission
• EuG, 01.02.2006 - T-206/04

  Rodrigues Carvalhais / OHMI - Profilpas (PERFIX)
• EuG, 23.10.2013 - T-589/11

  Phonebook of the World / OHMI - Seat Pagine Gialle (PAGINE GIALLE)
• EuG, 05.09.2012 - T-581/08

  Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional / OHMI - Proton Motor Fuel Cell (PM PROTON MOTOR)
• EuG, 06.06.2013 - T-486/07

  Ford Motor / OHMI - Alkar Automotive (CA)
• EuG, 20.01.2014 - T-88/12

  Charron Inox und Almet / Rat

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EuG, 25.09.2019 - T-689/13

  Bilbaína de Alquitranes u.a./ Kommission

  Rn. 29 Deuxièmement, en règle générale, la tâche procédurale d'une partie intervenante est sensiblement facilitée par le travail de la partie au soutien de laquelle elle est intervenue (ordonnance du 18 septembre 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība e.a./Commission, T-414/08 DEP à T-420/08 DEP et T-442/08 DEP, non publiée, EU:T:2015:726, point 54).

  Partant, la prise en compte d'une rémunération de ce niveau doit avoir pour contrepartie une évaluation nécessairement stricte du nombre total d'heures de travail indispensables aux fins de la procédure contentieuse (voir ordonnance du 18 septembre 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība e.a./Commission, T-414/08 DEP à T-420/08 DEP et T-442/08 DEP, non publiée, EU:T:2015:726, point 51 et jurisprudence citée).

• EuG, 26.01.2017 - T-181/14

  Nürburgring / EUIPO - Biedermann (Nordschleife) - Verfahren - Kostenfestsetzung

  Die Berücksichtigung einer so hohen Vergütung muss im Übrigen mit einer zwingend strikten Beurteilung der Gesamtzahl der für das streitige Verfahren notwendigen Arbeitsstunden einhergehen (vgl. in diesem Sinne Beschluss vom 18. September 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība u. a./Kommission, T-414/08 DEP bis T-420/08 DEP und T-442/08 DEP, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:T:2015:726, Rn. 51 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EuG, 27.11.2020 - T-103/15

  Flabeg Deutschland/ Kommission - Verfahren - Kostenfestsetzung

  Dies folgt insbesondere aus Art. 139 der Verfahrensordnung, wo vom "Verfahren vor dem Gericht" die Rede ist (Beschluss vom 6. Januar 2004, Mulder u. a./Rat und Kommission, C-104/89 DEP, EU:C:2004:1, Rn. 45, vgl. Beschluss vom 18. September 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība/Kommission, verbundene Rechtssachen T-414/08 DEP bis T-420/08 DEP und T-442/08 DEP, EU:T:2015:726, Rn. 41 sowie die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).

• EuG, 03.08.2023 - T-578/17

  a&o hostel and hotel Berlin/ Kommission - Verfahren - Kostenfestsetzung

  Die Anwaltshonorare, die sich auf einen Zeitraum nach dem mündlichen Verfahren beziehen, können nämlich nicht als für das Verfahren notwendige Aufwendungen eingestuft werden (Beschluss vom 18. September 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība u. a./Kommission, verbundene Rechtssachen T-414/08 DEP bis T-420/08 DEP und T-442/08 DEP, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:T:2015:726, Rn. 43 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EuG, 14.07.2020 - T-108/15

  Bundesverband Glasindustrie u.a./ Kommission - Verfahren - Kostenfestsetzung

  Dies folgt insbesondere aus Art. 139 der Verfahrensordnung, wo vom "Verfahren vor dem Gericht" die Rede ist (…Beschluss vom 6. Januar 2004, Mulder u. a./Rat und Kommission, C-104/89 DEP, EU:C:2004:1, Rn. 45; vgl. Beschluss vom 18. September 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība/Kommission, verbundene Rechtssachen T-414/08 DEP bis T 420/08 DEP und T-442/08 DEP, EU:T:2015:726, Rn. 41 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EuG, 13.12.2022 - T-227/20

  Biovene Cosmetics/ EUIPO - Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA)

  Dans ces conditions, une appréciation stricte des honoraires récupérables s'impose nécessairement (voir ordonnance du 18 septembre 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība e.a./Commission, T-414/08 DEP à T-420/08 DEP et T-442/08 DEP, non publiée, EU:T:2015:726, point 50 et jurisprudence citée).
• EuG, 09.04.2018 - T-580/13

  Real Express/ EUIPO - MIP Metro (real)

  Ainsi, ne sauraient constituer des dépens récupérables les frais et honoraires exposés par une partie pour l'élaboration, par son conseil, des consultations sur les chances de succès et de l'action qu'elle envisage (voir, en ce sens, ordonnances du 14 mars 1997, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Luftfahrt-Unternehmen et Hapag-Lloyd/Commission, T-25/96, EU:T:1997:34, point 34 ; du 10 avril 2014, Éditions Odile Jacob/Commission, T-279/04 DEP, non publiée, EU:T:2014:233, point 39, et du 18 septembre 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība e.a./Commission, T-414/08 DEP à T-420/08 DEP et T 442/08 DEP, non publiée, EU:T:2015:726, points 41 et 42).
• EuG, 12.10.2017 - T-896/16

  Puma/ EUIPO - Senator (TRINOMIC) - Unionsmarke - Erledigung - Kostenfestsetzung

  Die Berücksichtigung einer so hohen Vergütung muss im Übrigen mit einer zwingend strikten Beurteilung der Gesamtzahl der für das streitige Verfahren notwendigen Arbeitsstunden einhergehen (vgl. in diesem Sinne Beschluss vom 18. September 2015, Autortiesību un komunicešanās konsultāciju a&gcedil;entūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība u. a./Kommission, T-414/08 DEP bis T-420/08 DEP und T-442/08 DEP, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:T:2015:726, Rn. 51 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).