Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13
• EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 19750/13

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (39)

• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  Secondly, a "tribunal" must also satisfy a series of further requirements - independence, in particular from the executive; impartiality; duration of its members' terms of office; guarantees afforded by its procedure - several of which appear in the text of Article 6 § 1 (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, § 55, Series A no. 43, and Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], cited above, § 233).

  The Court has consistently held that the participation on tribunals of members without legal qualifications is not, as such, contrary to Article 6 (see, for instance, Haarde v. Iceland, no. 66847/12, §§ 103-08, 23 November 2017, regarding criminal proceedings conducted - at first and only instance - before a tribunal where the majority of the members were lay judges; see also Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, §§ 57-58, Series A no. 43, and Pabla Ky v. Finland, no. 47221/99, § 32, ECHR 2004-V).

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 110-26, 20 March 2018) views the latter complaint as one primarily falling under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, especially given that a "tribunal" within the meaning of Article 6 is also one within the meaning of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 (see Didier v. France (dec.), no. 58188/00, § 3, ECHR 2002-VII (extracts)).

  (ii) It is not the Court's task to address matters of its own motion; the Court is bound by the scope of the complaint as submitted to it by the applicant (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 108-09, 20 March 2018, Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos.

• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  He maintained that the disciplinary proceedings involved the determination of civil rights and obligations (citing König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, §§ 92-93, Series A no. 27).

 
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  Since the applicant did raise the substance of his grievances before the Constitutional Court and gave it the opportunity to assess whether the disciplinary chamber met the inherent requirements of a tribunal as laid down in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, § 64, Series A no. 132), the Court accepts that the applicant has exhausted domestic remedies as required by Article 35 § 1. It therefore rejects the Government's preliminary objection in this respect.
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  The concepts of "independence" and "impartiality" are closely linked and, depending on the circumstances, may require joint examination (see Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá, cited above, §§ 150 and 152; see also, as regards their close interrelationship, §§ 153-56; and Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 61-64, 25 September 2018).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  The Court being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, 17 September 2009, and Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  It follows, inter alia, that a judgment in which the Court finds a breach of the Convention or the Protocols thereto imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and to redress as far as possible the effects (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 254, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79

  Sramek ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  The term "independent" refers to independence vis-à-vis the other powers (the executive and the Parliament) (see Beaumartin v. France, 24 November 1994, § 38, Series A no. 296-B) and also vis-à-vis the parties (see Sramek v. Austria, 22 October 1984, § 42, Series A no. 84).
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 31098/08

  HIZB UT-TAHRIR AND OTHERS v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  This rule concerns only remedies which are normal and effective and an applicant cannot extend the strict time-limit imposed under the Convention by seeking to make inappropriate or misconceived applications to bodies or institutions which have no power or competence to offer effective redress for the complaint in issue under the Convention (see, for example, Fernie v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14881/04, 5 January 2006; Beiere v. Latvia, no. 30954/05, § 28, 29 November 2011; and, by contrast, Hizb Ut-Tahrir and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 31098/08, 12 June 2012; Petrovic v. Serbia, no. 40485/08, § 60, 15 July 2014; and Kondakovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 22677/11, 12 January 2016).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 20027/02

  Menschenrechte: Überlange Verfahrensdauer eines Zivilrechtsstreits
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 47195/06

  MÜLLER-HARTBURG v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

  ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96

  WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 42184/05

  CARSON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07

  GHERGHINA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 201/17

  MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 12096/14

  ROLA v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 15287/89

  BEAUMARTIN c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 76521/12

  EMINAGAOGLU c. TURQUIE
• KAG Münster, 26.02.2015 - 12/14

  Beteiligungsrechte der MAV gem. §§ 35 i. V. m. 33 MAVO - Weiterbeschäftigung über …
• EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99

  COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR - 34179/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 69291/12

  PELEKI c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 49859/99

  REZGUI contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 40378/10

  FAZIA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 14881/04

  FERNIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  HAARDE v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 27.08.2002 - 58188/00

  DIDIER contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 33908/04

  BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O., v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 46466/16

  GRACE GATT v. MALTA
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 71665/01

  AUGUSTO c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 22677/11

  KONDAKOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 8766/11

  RYBCZYNSKI AND RYBCZYNSKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 38585/04

  SIZINTSEVA v. RUSSIA
• BVerfG, 23.06.2015 - 1 BvL 13/11

  Ersatzbemessungsgrundlage im Grunderwerbsteuerrecht verfassungswidrig

• EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 55009/20

  HUCI c. ROUMANIE

  Il incombe au contraire à celui-ci de dénoncer une action ou omission comme contraire aux droits reconnus dans la Convention ou ses Protocoles de telle manière que la Cour n'ait pas à spéculer sur la question de savoir si tel ou tel grief a été ou non soulevé (Grosam c. République tchèque [GC], no 19750/13, § 90, 1er juin 2023).