Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

• doev.de

  Glukhin/Russland - Unzulässiger Einsatz von Gesichtserkennungstechnologie

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (23)

• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  records are used and processed and the results that may be obtained (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 35623/05

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens (Datenschutz; GPS-Überwachung; Observation; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  Germany, no. 35623/05, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2010 (extracts), and Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446/12, §§ 53-55, 8 February 2018); the registration of a person's name in a police database which automatically collected and processed information about that person's movements, by train or air (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 66, 21 June 2011); and video surveillance of university amphitheatres at a public university (see Antovi and Mirkovi v. Montenegro, no. 70838/13, §§ 40-45 and 55, 28 November 2017).
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  democratic society in order to achieve any such aim (see Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 227, ECHR 2015).

 
• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98

  P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  It has also found that the following instances of collection of data in a public place constituted an interference with the persons' private lives: the recording of a questioning in a public area of a police station (see P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, §§ 56-60, ECHR 2001-IX); recording by CCTV cameras in a public place and the subsequent disclosure of the videofootage to the media (see Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, §§ 57-63, ECHR 2003-I); recording of videofootage at a police station and its subsequent use in criminal proceedings (see Perry v. the United Kingdom, no. 63737/00, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); the collection, through a GPS device attached to a person's car, and storage of data concerning that person's whereabouts and movements in the public sphere (see Uzun.
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Articles 8 and 10, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and the merits of the complaint under Article 6 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 74440/17

  P.N. v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  77. In the context of the collection and processing of personal data, it is therefore essential to have clear, detailed rules governing the scope and application of measures, as well as minimum safeguards concerning, inter alia, duration, storage, usage, access of third parties, procedures for preserving the integrity and confidentiality of data and procedures for their destruction, thus providing sufficient guarantees against the risk of abuse and arbitrariness (see S. and Marper, cited above, § 99, and P.N. v. Germany, no. 74440/17, § 62, 11 June 2020).
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 30194/09

  SHIMOVOLOS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  Germany, no. 35623/05, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2010 (extracts), and Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446/12, §§ 53-55, 8 February 2018); the registration of a person's name in a police database which automatically collected and processed information about that person's movements, by train or air (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 66, 21 June 2011); and video surveillance of university amphitheatres at a public university (see Antovi and Mirkovi v. Montenegro, no. 70838/13, §§ 40-45 and 55, 28 November 2017).
• EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 63737/00

  PERRY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  It has also found that the following instances of collection of data in a public place constituted an interference with the persons' private lives: the recording of a questioning in a public area of a police station (see P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, §§ 56-60, ECHR 2001-IX); recording by CCTV cameras in a public place and the subsequent disclosure of the videofootage to the media (see Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, §§ 57-63, ECHR 2003-I); recording of videofootage at a police station and its subsequent use in criminal proceedings (see Perry v. the United Kingdom, no. 63737/00, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); the collection, through a GPS device attached to a person's car, and storage of data concerning that person's whereabouts and movements in the public sphere (see Uzun.
• EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 43514/15

  CATT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  67. The Court has previously found that the collection and storing of data by the authorities on particular individuals constituted an interference with those persons' private lives, even if that data concerned exclusively the person's public activities (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 65-67, ECHR 2000-II, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000-V), such as participation in antigovernment demonstrations (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 170, 24 May 2011, and Catt v. the United Kingdom, no. 43514/15, § 93, 24 January 2019).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  records are used and processed and the results that may be obtained (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

  ASSOCIATION
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 31446/12

  BEN FAIZA c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11

  NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 45245/15

  GAUGHRAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  ELVIRA DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 25501/07

  NOVIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 9988/13

  ECODEFENCE AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 48 other applications
• EGMR, 17.12.2018 - 8019/16
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 4161/13

  KARUYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 54714/17

  SVETOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 28448/16

  CHIGIRINOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 10810/15

  SMADIKOV v. RUSSIA

• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18

  ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Grigoryev and Igamberdiyeva, cited above, about inadequate redress for unlawful deprivation of liberty and for unjustified interference with the freedom of expression in the context of administrative-offence prosecution for participation in public events; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest him; Butkevich, cited above, §§ 129-39, as to unjustified interference (measures in relation to media coverage of public assemblies) with the applicant's freedom of expression; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38671/21

  PEREVOZCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest him; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 178-88, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
• EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 40486/21

  PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest him.

 
• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 48523/19

  N.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court may draw such inferences as it deems appropriate from a party's failure or refusal to participate effectively in the proceedings (Rule 44C of the Rules of Court) (see Svetova and Others v. Russia, no. 54714/17, §§ 29-31, 24 January 2023, and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 42-43, 4 July 2023).
• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 34358/16

  AKHMEDNABIYEV AND KAMALOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court may draw such inferences as it deems appropriate from a party's failure or refusal to participate effectively in the proceedings (Rule 44C of the Rules of Court and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, § 42, 4 July 2023).
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 44850/18

  KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  2430/06 and 3 others, §§ 25-44, 31 May 2016, as to the applicant's absence at the appeal hearings; Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest him; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR - 14379/18 (anhängig)

  NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

  8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a person who had staged a solo demonstration with the anti-war banner and his subsequent conviction under Art. 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO (final decision taken on 12/01/2023, complaint raised on appeal) (see Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 78-91, 4 July 2023);.
• EGMR - 57352/21 (anhängig)

  KELLER v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications

  8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition techniques to identify the applicant (see Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, 4 July 2023).