Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOLDATENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Preliminary objections dismissed Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 (in case of extradition to Turkmenistan) Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07
• EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 2440/07

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (13)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

  QUINN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  Therefore, Article 5 § 1 (c) and, accordingly, Article 5 § 3 of the Convention are not applicable in the present case (see Quinn v. France, judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, § 53).
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 9808/02

  STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  The existence of the remedy required by Article 5 § 4 must be sufficiently certain, not only in theory but also in practice, failing which it will lack the accessibility and effectiveness required for the purposes of that provision (see, mutatis mutandis, Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 66 in fine, 24 March 2005, and Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 42987/98

  VACHEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  The existence of the remedy required by Article 5 § 4 must be sufficiently certain, not only in theory but also in practice, failing which it will lack the accessibility and effectiveness required for the purposes of that provision (see, mutatis mutandis, Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 66 in fine, 24 March 2005, and Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 67531/01

  GORSHKOV CONTRE L'UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  In other contexts, those constitutional safeguards are set out in further detail in separate instruments, such as the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Psychiatric Medical Assistance Act in the case of compulsory psychiatric treatment (see Gorshkov v. Ukraine, no. 67531/01, § 30, 8 November 2005).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  In so far as any liability under the Convention is or may be incurred, it is liability incurred by the extraditing Contracting State by reason of its having taken action which has as a direct consequence the exposure of an individual to proscribed ill-treatment (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 35-36, §§ 89-91; Garabayev v. Russia, cited above, § 73).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  In cases such as the present the Court must examine the foreseeable consequences of sending the applicant to the receiving country, bearing in mind the general situation there and his personal circumstances (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, § 108 in fine).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

  Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  The applicant referred to the Court's judgment in the case of Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands (no. 1948/04, § 147, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)), in which it had found that there would be a violation of Article 3 if the applicant returned to Somalia, since the national authorities could not guarantee his security.
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

  BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 656/06

  NASRULLOYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 38411/02

  GARABAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 67679/01

  KATANI ET AUTRES contre l'ALLEMAGNE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.12.2025 - C-580/24

  Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union - …

  {FN:31} Vgl. EGMR, 15. November 1996, Chahal/Vereinigtes Königreich (CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493, § 112), und EGMR, 23. Oktober 2008, Soldatenko/Ukraine (CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007, § 109).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.07.2015 - C-237/15

  Lanigan - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - …

  Vgl. insoweit EGMR, Soldatenko/Ukraine, 23. Oktober 2008, Nr. 2440/07, § 112, sowie Toniolo/San Marino und Italien, 26. Juni 2012, Nr. 44853/10, § 46.
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.10.2016 - C-640/15

  Vilkas - Europäischer Haftbefehl - Fristen für die Übergabe der gesuchten Person …

  {FN:27} - Urteile des EGMR vom 23. Oktober 2008, Soldatenko/Ukraine (CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007, Rn. 112), und vom 26. Juni 2012, Toniolo/San Marino und Italien (…CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310, Rn. 46 bis 50).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 04.05.2017 - C-18/16

  K. - Asylpolitik - Normen für die Aufnahme von Personen, die internationalen …

  Diese Auffassung wird durch die Rechtsprechung des EGMR gestützt (vgl. z. B. Urteil des EGMR vom 23. Oktober 2008, Soldatenko/Ukraine, CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007, § 109).