Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DEMIREL AND ATES v. TURKEY (N°2)

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  As established in the case-law, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure.
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94

  CEYLAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos.

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24919/94

  GERGER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  As established in the case-law, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure.
• EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 27528/95

  KIZILYAPRAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003).
• EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 37645/97

  SAWICKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  The Court may make an award in respect of costs and expenses in so far as these were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Sawicka v. Poland, no. 37645/97, § 54, 1 October 2002).
• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 28635/95

  IBRAHIM AKSOY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24762/94

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 4)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  The Court has examined the judgment in question and it would appear that no sufficient reasoning was given in the judgment to justify the interference with the applicants' right to freedom of expression (see, mutatis mutandis, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, § 58, 8 July 1999).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 22678/93

  INCAL CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE

  - failure to communicate to the applicants the prosecutor's opinion before the Court of Cassation (violations of Article 6) in the cases of Çamyar and Berktaş (41959/02), Çapan (71978/01), Çapan No. 2 (29849/02), Çolak and Kasımoğulları (29969/07), Demirel and Ateş (10037/03), Demirel and Ateş No. 2 (31080/02), Demirel and Ateş No. 3 (11976/03), Halis Doğan No. 2 (71984/01), Falakoğlu (16229/03), Falakoğlu and Saygılı (11461/03), Falakoğlu and Saygılı (22147/02), Gözel and Özer (43453/04), Güzel No. 2 (65849/01), Karakoyun and Turan (18482/03), Özer (35721/04), Erdal Taş No. 3 (17445/02), Erdal Taş No. 4 (29847/02), Yalçıner (64116/00), Yıldız and Taş No. 1 (77641/01), Yıldız and Taş No. 2 (77642/01), Yıldız and Taş No. 3 (477/02), Yıldız and Taş No. 4 (3847/02) (this issue was examined under the Mehmet Göç group of cases (see Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)307));.

  31080/02.

• EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 38991/02

  [ENG]

  A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Özgür Gündem v. Turkey (no. 23144/93, § 32, ECHR 2000-III) and Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 31080/02, § 12, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03

  [ENG]

  A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2), (no. 31080/02, § 12, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 39457/03

  SAYGILI AND FALAKAOGLU v. TURKEY

  A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Özgür Gündem v. Turkey (no. 23144/93, § 32, ECHR 2000-III), and Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 31080/02, § 12, 29 November 2007).