Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Lakatos and Others v. Serbia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
This form of detention can only be justified in a given case if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
Where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
Treatment has been held by the Court to be "inhuman" because, inter alia, it was premeditated, was applied for hours at a stretch and caused either actual bodily injury or intense physical and mental suffering (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
The Court has, however, also frequently underlined the need to apply the exhaustion rule with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no. 13; and Akdivar, cited above, § 69). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
As established in Neumeister v. Austria (judgment of 27 June 1968, § 4, Series A no. 8, p. 37), the second limb of Article 5 § 3 does not give judicial authorities a choice between either bringing an accused to trial within a reasonable time or granting him provisional release pending trial. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
It is not necessary for the Convention right to be explicitly raised in domestic proceedings provided that the complaint is raised at least in substance (see Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 66, Reports 1996-IV). - EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
The requirements of an investigation and the undeniable difficulties inherent in the fight against crime cannot justify placing limits on the protection to be afforded in respect of the physical integrity of individuals (Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 115, Series A no. 241-A). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
46133/99 and 48183/99, § 66, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 130, 22 May 2012; see also paragraph 24 above as regards the Constitutional Court's approach to this issue). - EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 2293/03
WIESER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01
BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99
BALOGH v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04
MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 33123/08
SIZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
- EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87
RAIMONDO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01
MOUISEL v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96
PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18
RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA
The Court notes that under this provision a complaint alleging a violation of the presumption of innocence by statements of those not involved in criminal proceedings can be submitted by the individual concerned in the course of the ongoing criminal proceedings (contrast Lakatos and Others v. Serbia, no. 3363/08, § 113 in fine, 7 January 2014, and Orkopiridze, cited above, § 114). - EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 43627/16
OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA
In such circumstances, only the civil-law remedy could, on the basis of the criteria set out in the Court's case-law, provide adequate and sufficient redress (see Lakatos and Others v. Serbia, no. 3363/08, §§ 108-11, 7 January 2014; Januskeviciene v. Lithuania, no. 69717/14, § 59, 3 September 2019, with further references).