Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07, 18817/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,55063
EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07, 18817/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55063)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.05.2011 - 33810/07, 18817/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55063)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Mai 2011 - 33810/07, 18817/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55063)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55063) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASSOCIATION "21 DECEMBER 1989" AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA [Extracts]

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Respondent State to take individual measures Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASSOCIATION « 21 DECEMBRE 1989 » ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 (volet procédural) Violation de l'art. 8 Partiellement irrecevable Etat défendeur tenu de prendre des mesures générales Préjudice moral - réparation ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASSOCIATION "21 DECEMBER 1989" AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect);Violation of Art. 8;Remainder inadmissible;Respondent State to take individual measures;Non-pecuniary damage - award

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (89)

  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09

    [FRE]

    The Court reiterates that it had already dismissed a similar objection in its judgment in the case of Association "21 December 1989" and Others (nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, §§ 119-125, 24 May 2011).

    In the instant case, the Court notes that the applicant has previously lodged another application before it, registered as no. 33810/07, raising, under Article 8, a complaint similar to that raised in the context of the present application, which is registered as number 45886/07.

    The Court must therefore determine whether, in the present case, the application is "substantially the same" as the matter submitted to it in application no. 33810/07.

    The Court has ruled that, in the event of widespread use of lethal force against the civilian population during anti-Government demonstrations preceding the transition from a totalitarian regime to a more democratic system, the Court cannot accept that an investigation has been effective where it is terminated as a result of the statutory limitation of criminal liability, when it is the authorities themselves who have remained inactive (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 144, 24 May 2011).

    Such an investigation may not end with prescription (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 144, 24 May 2011).

  • EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12

    Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter

    A victim, such as the applicant in the present case, who had made a credible allegation of being subjected to ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, has the right to obtain an accurate account of the suffering endured and the role of those responsible for his ordeal (see paragraph 641 above; see also Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 144, 24 May 2011; Al Nashiri v. Poland, cited above, § 495; and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, cited above, § 487).

    In this connection, it can be inferred from the Court's case-law that the obligation of a Contracting State to conduct an effective investigation under Article 3, as under Article 2, of the Convention persists as long as such an investigation remains feasible but has not been carried out or has not met the Convention standards (see, for instance, Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 202, 24 May 2011; Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502/06, §§ 218-219, 12 November 2013; Mocanu and Others, cited above, §§ 314-326; see also, mutatis mutandis, Jeronovičs v. Latvia ï›GCï, no. 44898/10, §§ 107 and 118, 5 July 2016).

    33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011.

  • EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 35252/08

    CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN

    In Klass and Others v. Germany (6 September 1978, § 51, Series A no. 28) and Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania (nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, §§ 174-75, 24 May 2011), the Court had considered "exploratory" or "general surveillance" as problematic.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht