Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 37715/97
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

Wird zitiert von ... (22)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95 and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 (see judgments of the same date).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95 and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 (see judgments of the same date).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see the Yaşa v. Turkey judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 2439-2440, §§ 102-104; Cakıcı v. Turkey cited above, §§ 80, 87 and 106; Tanrikulu v. Turkey, cited above, § 109; Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, [Section I] ECHR 2000-III, §§ 106-107).

• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94

  CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  These civil proceedings are wholly independent of any criminal investigation and their efficacy has not been shown to rely on the proper conduct of criminal investigations or prosecutions (see e.g. Caraher v. the United Kingdom, no. 24520/94, decision of inadmissibility [Section 3] 11.01.00).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC] no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII, § 100, and also Çakıcı v. Turkey, [GC] ECHR 1999- IV, § 85, Ertak v. Turkey no. 20764/92 [Section 1] ECHR 2000-V, § 32 and Timurtaş v. Turkey, no. 23531/94 [Section 1] ECHR 2000-VI, § 82).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia eye witness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see concerning autopsies, e.g. Salman v. Turkey cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses e.g. Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 109; concerning forensic evidence e.g. Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, [Section 4], § 89).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95 and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 (see judgments of the same date).
• EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

  GÜL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia eye witness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see concerning autopsies, e.g. Salman v. Turkey cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses e.g. Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 109; concerning forensic evidence e.g. Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, [Section 4], § 89).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
  Il est à noter toutefois que dans l'affaire McCann et autres l'enquête judiciaire était à certains égards exceptionnelle en regard des procédures mises en œuvre en Irlande du Nord dans un certain nombre d'affaires (voir également les arrêts du 4 mai 2001 dans les affaires Hugh Jordan c. Royaume-Uni, no 24746/94, Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, et Shanaghan c. Royaume-Uni, no 37715/97).

  Or tel n'est pas le cas [Note du greffe: des passages similaires figurent dans les arrêts Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni et Shanaghan c. Royaume-Uni (nos 30054/96 et 37715/97, 4 mai 2001).].

  no 37715/97, 4 mai 2001.

• EGMR, 20.11.2014 - 47708/08

  [ENG]

  Toutefois, l'enquête doit également être suffisamment vaste pour permettre aux autorités qui en sont chargées de prendre en considération non seulement les actes des agents de l'État qui ont directement eu recours à la force meurtrière mais aussi l'ensemble des circonstances les ayant entourés, notamment la préparation des opérations en cours et le contrôle exercé sur elles, au cas où ces éléments seraient nécessaires pour déterminer si l'État a satisfait ou non à l'obligation que l'article 2 fait peser sur lui de protéger la vie (voir, par implication, McCann, précité, §§ 150 et 162, Hugh Jordan c. Royaume-Uni, no 24746/94, § 128, CEDH 2001-III, McKerr, précité, §§ 143 et 151, Shanaghan c. Royaume-Uni, no 37715/97, §§ 100-125, 4 mai 2001, Finucane c. Royaume-Uni, no 29178/95, §§ 77-78, CEDH 2003-VIII, Natchova, précité, §§ 114-115, ainsi que, mutatis mutandis, Tzekov c. Bulgarie, no 45500/99, § 71, 23 février 2006).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97 (see judgments of the same date).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom (no. 24746/94), McKerr v. the United Kingdom (no. 28883/95) and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom (no. 37715/97).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 28864/18

  GRIBBEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Relevant Committee of Ministers Resolutions 93. In addition to its earlier judgment in the present case (McCaughey and Others, cited above), the Court has adopted seven other judgments concerning the investigation of killings by security forces in Northern Ireland between 1968 and 1998 (see Hugh Jordan, cited above; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, 4 May 2001; Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, 4 May 2001; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, 28 May 2002; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Hemsworth v. the United Kingdom, no. 58559/09, 16 July 2013).

  As already indicated, the Court would normally assess compliance with the duty to investigate under Article 2 of the Convention by carrying out a global assessment of all the investigatory steps that have been taken and, indeed, this was the approach taken in Hugh Jordan, McKerr, Kelly and Others (all cited above), Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, 4 May 2001, McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, 28 May 2002, and Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, ECHR 2003-VIII. It is clear from the Court's judgment in McCaughey and Others that the applicants had expressly complained about the entirely of the investigative steps taken, including the investigation by the RUC and the decisions taken by the DPP (see McCaughey and Others, cited above, §§ 105-106).

• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  KHATSIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In all cases, however, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 91-92, 4 May 2001).
• EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95

  FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Government accepted that, in the light of the Court's previous judgments (Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, 4 May 2001, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, 4 May 2001, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, 4 May 2001), the RUC investigation, the inquest and the Stevens inquiries did not cumulatively satisfy the procedural requirement imposed by Article 2 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 23954/94

  AKDENIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  The Court has held in four recent judgments (Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94 (Sect. 3), 4 May 2001, §§ 164 and 165; Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95 (Sect. 3), 4 May 2001, §§ 158 and 159; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 (Sect. 3), 4.5.2001, §§ 175 and 176; and Shanagan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97 (Sect. 3), 4 May 2001, §§ 139 and 140):.
• EGMR, 14.05.2009 - 21810/03

  TAYSUMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In all cases, however, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 91-92, 4 May 2001).
• EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 7654/02

  AYUBOV v. RUSSIA

  In all cases, however, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 91-92, 4 May 2001).
• EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 34491/97

  CEYHAN DEMIR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 23039/02

  WEBER ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 27183/03

  ZAURBEKOVA AND ZAURBEKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 27243/03

  MUSIKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 58933/00

  ADIYAMAN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 22057/02

  YUSUPOVA AND ZAURBEKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 13752/06

  BOZTAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 67326/01

  MEZHIDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39166/04

  KHALITOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2003 - 10231/02

  ZAMULA and OTHERS v. UKRAINE