Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TURBYLEV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (75)Zitiert selbst (14)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination are generally recognised international standards which lie at the heart of the notion of a fair procedure under Article 6. Their rationale lies, inter alia, in the protection of the accused against improper compulsion by the authorities, thereby contributing to the avoidance of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6. The right not to incriminate oneself, in particular, presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resort to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 7377/03

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  A systematic restriction of the right of access to legal assistance, on the basis of statutory provisions, is sufficient in itself for a violation of Article 6 to be found (see Salduz, cited above, § 56; and Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, § 33, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Early access to a lawyer at the investigation stage of the proceedings serves as a procedural guarantee of the privilege against self-incrimination and a fundamental safeguard against ill-treatment, given the particular vulnerability of the accused at that stage of the proceedings (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 54, ECHR 2008; Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 263, 21 April 2011; and Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 79, 30 May 2013).

• EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 46661/99

  SÖYLEMEZ c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Taking such statements into consideration in finding a person guilty is incompatible with the guarantees of Article 6 (see Söylemez v. Turkey, no. 46661/99, § 122, 21 September 2006).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, this being primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  Having regard to the nature and circumstances of the ill-treatment, the Court finds that it amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 87-93, ECHR 2010; Nasakin v. Russia, no. 22735/05, §§ 51-55, 18 July 2013; and Mostipan v. Russia, no. 12042/09, §§ 58-61, 16 October 2014).
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  This was indicative of the State's failure to comply with its obligation under Article 3 to carry out an effective investigation (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014).
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  The Court considers that such a delay could not but have had an adverse impact on the investigation, undermining the investigative authority's ability to secure the evidence concerning the alleged ill-treatment (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001; Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 137, 29 July 2010; Eldar Imanov and Azhdar Imanov v. Russia, no. 6887/02, § 99, 16 December 2010; and Shishkin v. Russia, no. 18280/04, § 100, 7 July 2011).
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 36716/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02

  ELDAR IMANOV AND AZHDAR IMANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  The Court considers that such a delay could not but have had an adverse impact on the investigation, undermining the investigative authority's ability to secure the evidence concerning the alleged ill-treatment (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001; Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 137, 29 July 2010; Eldar Imanov and Azhdar Imanov v. Russia, no. 6887/02, § 99, 16 December 2010; and Shishkin v. Russia, no. 18280/04, § 100, 7 July 2011).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 41844/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 22735/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 12042/09

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17

  KOZAYEV v. RUSSIA and 26 other applications

  42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017; Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 43, 6 December 2012; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.

  Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - In their decisions the courts relied on the confession statement of 22/04/2014 obtained under duress in the absence of a lawyer (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

  Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - use of confession statement of 13/11/2016 obtained as a result of duress to convict the applicant (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

  Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - the applicant's conviction was based on the self-incriminating statements the applicant had made as a result of his ill-treatment and in the absence of a lawyer (Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  MASLOVA v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.

  Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - in view of the use of the applicant's self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture for his conviction (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 92-97, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06

  KUDAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment and the rights of suspects, see Ryabtsev v. Russia (no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013); Lyapin v. Russia (no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014); and Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR - 39383/08 (anhängig)

  AKHKUBEKOV v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications

  For relevant domestic law and practice concerning the rights of suspects, see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015.

  c) the co-defendants' incriminating statements against the applicants given during the investigation and allegedly obtained under duress (see Huseyn and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 35485/05 and 3 others, § 202, 26 July 2011; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; Urazbayev v. Russia, no. 13128/06, §§ 60-62, 8 October 2019; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 79, 26 November 2019)?.

• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment and the rights of suspects, see Ryabtsev v. Russia (no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013); Lyapin v. Russia (no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014); and Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 48053/06

  USPANOV v. RUSSIA

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the rights of suspects, see Turbylev v. Russia (no. 4722/09, §§ 46-49, 6 October 2015).

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR - 24592/10 (anhängig)

  KNYAZKINY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

  Having regard to the injuries found on the applicants after the time spent by them in State custody, have the applicants been subjected to torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015; Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, 8 October 2015; Aleksandr Andreyev v. Russia, no. 2281/06, 23 February 2016; and Leonid Petrov v. Russia, no. 52783/08, 11 October 2016)?.

  Having regard to the use of the applicants' "statements of surrender and confession" (явка с повинной), which were allegedly obtained as a result of their ill-treatment by the police (see Appendix No 3), did the applicants have a fair hearing, in accordance with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015 and Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, 28 November 2017)?.

• EGMR - 10723/18 (anhängig)

  KUROV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

  Having regard to the injuries found on the applicants after the time spent by them in State custody, have the applicants been subjected to torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015; Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, 8 October 2015; Aleksandr Andreyev v. Russia, no. 2281/06, 23 February 2016; and Leonid Petrov v. Russia, no. 52783/08, 11 October 2016)?.

  As regards case no. 13701/18, having regard to the use of the applicant's "statement of surrender and confession" (явка с повинной), which was allegedly obtained as a result of his ill-treatment by the police and in the absence of a lawyer, did the applicant have a fair hearing, in accordance with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015)? The reference in being made to the appeal judgment of 12 December 2017 of the Supreme Court of the Dagestan Republic.

• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6739/11

  BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA

  They, thus, failed to assess the quality of the evidence and whether the circumstances in which it was obtained cast doubt on its reliability or accuracy (see Mehmet Duman v. Turkey, no. 38740/09, §§ 45-46, 23 October 2018; Abdulkadyrov and Dakhtayev v. Russia, no. 35061/04, §§ 79-81, 10 July 2018; and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 87, 6 October 2015).

  Interestingly enough, the majority seeks support for this position in three cases, cited in paragraph 94 (Mehmet Duman v. Turkey, no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018, Abdulkadyrov and Dakhtayev v. Russia, no. 35061/04, 10 July 2018 and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015).

• EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 17161/11

  ZASSETY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

  Having regard to the injuries found on the applicants after the time spent by them in State custody, have the applicants been subjected to torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015; Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, 8 October 2015; Aleksandr Andreyev v. Russia, no. 2281/06, 23 February 2016; and Leonid Petrov v. Russia, no. 52783/08, 11 October 2016)?.

  As regards case no. 17161/11, having regard to the use of the applicant's "statement of surrender and confession" (явка с повинной), which was allegedly obtained as a result of his ill-treatment by the police and in the absence of a lawyer, did the applicant have a fair hearing, in accordance with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, 6 October 2015)? The reference is being made to the judgment of 23 June 2010 of the Pacific Ocean Fleet Military Court of Vladivostok.

• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 19498/11

  IDRISOV v. RUSSIA and 12 other applications
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 58772/18

  IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 8372/07

  TSUROYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 15367/07

  ORAZBAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 8607/09 (anhängig)

  DZHANTEMIROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
• EGMR - 3490/11 (anhängig)

  KOTKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 57269/14

  SAMESOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 52783/08

  PETROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 10825/09

  OLISOV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
• EGMR - 3294/10 (anhängig)

  VOKHMYANIN v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR - 58144/08 (anhängig)

  YEZHKOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  MANSUROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 19147/08 (anhängig)

  LAVRENTYEV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR - 4057/10 (anhängig)

  DAURBEKOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR - 21396/11 (anhängig)

  ALEKSANDROV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR - 55708/10 (anhängig)

  DAVYDOV v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
• EGMR - 20605/11 (anhängig)

  PANCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 05.10.2021 - 29627/10

  KOVAL v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11

  ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  BELUGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 35061/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18

  TINGAYEV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
• EGMR - 5264/10 (anhängig)

  PULYALIN v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR - 25400/10 (anhängig)

  GARMASHOV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR - 25437/11 (anhängig)

  SULTANOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 18032/19

  BARONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 46248/07

  SHESTOPALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 3016/16

  BOGDAN v. UKRAINE and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 30389/19

  GOLOVACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 13074/07

  BALBASHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 45767/09

  UTVENKO c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 14416/06

  Russland muss gefoltertem Mann 50.000 Euro Entschädigung zahlen
• EGMR - 68434/17 (anhängig)

  GILMUTDINOV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 15269/13

  RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 52673/07

  GRIGORYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06

  URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 2674/07

  SERGEY RYABOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 39708/07

  KONOVALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 69816/17 (anhängig)

  GOROKHOV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
• EGMR - 8187/08 (anhängig)

  SHAVAYEV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR - 79720/17 (anhängig)

  KNYAZEVICH v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 15476/08

  FREDRIKSEN v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications
• EGMR - 70713/12 (anhängig)

  KVASOV v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 63160/13

  AZARSANOV AND BOROKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 48741/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 7415/09

  GOROKH v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 9519/10

  BATRAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 16480/10

  SANNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.04.2017 - 32546/08

  MORGUNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 30279/09 (anhängig)

  BABICHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 17853/09

  PETUKHOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 42265/06

  NEUYMIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 62798/09

  IVANOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 31632/10

  KONDAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 14769/09

  SITNIKOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR - 25877/12 (anhängig)

  AKIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 40452/10 (anhängig)

  BORISOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 49290/06

  MARSHALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 51098/07

  KURKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 6587/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 15524/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 11213/17 (anhängig)

  KHURSHUDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 38106/05

  YURCHENKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 17972/15 (anhängig)

  EDIGOV v. RUSSIA