Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KALPACHKA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violations of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  The Court, reiterating that the existence of a "charge" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 is to be determined autonomously (see, among many other authorities, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36), considers that the period to be taken into consideration began on 12 September 1994, when the applicant was first questioned in the course of the preliminary inquiry against her (see paragraph 11 above).
• EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

  Stögmüller ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  Concerning the end of this period, the Court notes that one of the purposes of the right to a trial within a reasonable time is to protect individuals from remaining too long in a state of uncertainty about their fate (see Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X; citing Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 5).
• EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00

  WITHEY contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  Concerning the end of this period, the Court notes that one of the purposes of the right to a trial within a reasonable time is to protect individuals from remaining too long in a state of uncertainty about their fate (see Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X; citing Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 5).

• EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 59913/00

  VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  In this connection, the Court notes that in previous cases against Bulgaria it has already observed that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings have been brought about by the unjustified remittal of criminal cases to the investigation stage (see Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, citing Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003; see also S.H.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 37355/97, §§ 19 and 38, 23 October 2003; E.M.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 43231/98, §§ 61 and 144, 18 January 2005; and Nedyalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 44241/98, § 92, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 44241/98

  NEDYALKOV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  In this connection, the Court notes that in previous cases against Bulgaria it has already observed that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings have been brought about by the unjustified remittal of criminal cases to the investigation stage (see Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, citing Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003; see also S.H.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 37355/97, §§ 19 and 38, 23 October 2003; E.M.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 43231/98, §§ 61 and 144, 18 January 2005; and Nedyalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 44241/98, § 92, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 37104/97

  KITOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  In this connection, the Court notes that in previous cases against Bulgaria it has already observed that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings have been brought about by the unjustified remittal of criminal cases to the investigation stage (see Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, citing Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003; see also S.H.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 37355/97, §§ 19 and 38, 23 October 2003; E.M.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 43231/98, §§ 61 and 144, 18 January 2005; and Nedyalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 44241/98, § 92, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 43231/98

  E.M.K. v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  In this connection, the Court notes that in previous cases against Bulgaria it has already observed that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings have been brought about by the unjustified remittal of criminal cases to the investigation stage (see Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, citing Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003; see also S.H.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 37355/97, §§ 19 and 38, 23 October 2003; E.M.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 43231/98, §§ 61 and 144, 18 January 2005; and Nedyalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 44241/98, § 92, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 23.10.2003 - 37355/97

  S.H.K. v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

  In this connection, the Court notes that in previous cases against Bulgaria it has already observed that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings have been brought about by the unjustified remittal of criminal cases to the investigation stage (see Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, citing Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003; see also S.H.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 37355/97, §§ 19 and 38, 23 October 2003; E.M.K. v. Bulgaria, no. 43231/98, §§ 61 and 144, 18 January 2005; and Nedyalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 44241/98, § 92, 3 November 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 10195/08

  KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA

  As concerns the complaint of a violation of the third and sixth applicants' other fair trial guarantees under Article 6, the Court reiterates that a person may not claim to be a victim of a violation of his or her right to a fair trial under Article 6 which allegedly took place in the course of proceedings in which he or she was acquitted or which were discontinued (see, for example, Kalpachka v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 49163/99, 19 May 2005, with further references).
• EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 38299/05

  SPAS TODOROV v. BULGARIA

  Indeed, the Court has already noted in previous cases against Bulgaria that inordinate delays in criminal proceedings were brought about by the unnecessary remittal of cases on excessively formalistic grounds (see Kitov v. Bulgaria, no. 37104/97, § 73, 3 April 2003, Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, § 93, 2 February 2006, Kalpachka v. Bulgaria, no. 49163/99, § 73, 2 November 2006 and Karov v. Bulgaria, no. 45964/99, §§ 62 and 63, 16 November 2006).

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KALPACHKA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 10, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 13.03.1980 - 8083/77

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99

  The Court reiterates that a person may not claim to be a victim of a violation of his or her right to a fair trial under Article 6 which allegedly took place in the course of proceedings in which he or she was acquitted or which were discontinued (see X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, DR 19, p. 223, Eğinlioğlu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported, and Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 28490/95

  HULKI GÜNES CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99

  As the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 6 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by paragraph 1, the Court will examine the complaint under both provisions taken together (see, as a recent authority, Hulki Güneş v. Turkey, no. 28490/95, § 87, ECHR 2003-VII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 47092/99

  EKIMDJIEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99

  The Court must firstly examine whether following the discontinuation of the criminal proceedings against her the applicant may still claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see Ekimdjiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 47092/99, 3 March 2005).
• EKMR, 03.05.1993 - 19890/92

  ZIEGLER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99

  However, absent such indications, the mere "institution of criminal proceedings as a result of complaints by individuals cannot, as such, constitute an interference with a person's exercise of his right to freedom of expression" (see Ziegler v. Switzerland, no. 19890/92, Commission decision of 3 May 1993, Decisions and Reports (DR) 74, p. 234, at p. 240).
• EKMR, 07.09.1989 - 13420/87

  PITARQUE contre l'ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 49163/99

  In the particular circumstances of the case the Court is inclined to think that the discontinuation of the proceedings because of the said amendments of the CC related, at least in substance, to the complaint raised by the applicant under the Convention and constituted sufficient redress for her grievance (see, mutatis mutandis, Pitarque v. Spain, no. 13420/87, Commission decision of 7 September 1989, DR 62, p. 258).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen