Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17, 37714/17, 57948/17   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2024,1149
EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17, 37714/17, 57948/17 (https://dejure.org/2024,1149)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.02.2024 - 34015/17, 37714/17, 57948/17 (https://dejure.org/2024,1149)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Februar 2024 - 34015/17, 37714/17, 57948/17 (https://dejure.org/2024,1149)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,1149) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (25)

  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

    Burka-Verbot: In Würde verschleiert

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 44774/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    The manifestation of religious belief may take various forms, namely worship, teaching, practice and observance (see Kokkinakis, cited above, § 31, and Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, § 105, ECHR 2005-XI).
  • EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

    Kokkinakis ./. Griechenland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

    Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 24645/94

    Buscarini et al ./. San Marino

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

    MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, the applicant may claim reimbursement of those fees (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 89, 17 April 2012; Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§ 371-72, 28 November 2017; and Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, § 62, 30 January 2020).
  • EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, the applicant may claim reimbursement of those fees (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 89, 17 April 2012; Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§ 371-72, 28 November 2017; and Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, § 62, 30 January 2020).
  • EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8460/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, the applicant may claim reimbursement of those fees (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 89, 17 April 2012; Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§ 371-72, 28 November 2017; and Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, § 62, 30 January 2020).
  • EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 32538/10

    AHMADOV c. AZERBAÏDJAN et 4 autres affaires

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, the applicant may claim reimbursement of those fees (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 89, 17 April 2012; Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§ 371-72, 28 November 2017; and Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, § 62, 30 January 2020).
  • EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

    OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17
    In that connection, the Court notes that it is apparent that in so far as the restrictions did not regulate the content of the religious expression or the manner of its delivery, they were not fit to protect society from religious extremism or any other forms of intolerance (compare Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 45, 7 March 2023).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

    ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

  • EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

    RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

    DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE

  • EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

    FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 48173/99

    Y.B. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

    MITYANIN v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  • EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16

    HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

    MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 65583/13

    MAMMAD AZIZOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 64581/16

    JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08

    HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 13.01.2026 - 14307/17

    GAHRAMAN v. AZERBAIJAN

    Rn. 30 The Court notes that in Natig Jafarov v. Azerbaijan (no. 64581/16, §§ 37-41, 7 November 2019) and Sardar Babayev v. Azerbaijan (nos. 34015/17 and 26896/18, §§ 42-43, 1 February 2024), having examined an identical complaint based on similar facts, it found that the applicants' confinement in a metal cage during a pre-trial detention hearing had amounted to degrading treatment.
  • EGMR, 24.06.2025 - 46084/21

    H.Q. v. HUNGARY

    Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Sardar Babayev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 34015/17 and 26896/18, §§ 53-54, 1 February 2024).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2024 - 12058/21

    HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Rn. 140 Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above (see paragraphs 132-138 above), the Court considers that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Sardar Babayev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 34015/17 and 26896/18, §§ 53-54, 1 February 2024).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17

    RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    34015/17 and 26896/18, § 72, 1 February 2024).
  • EGMR - 21167/20 (anhängig)

    ER v. TÜRKİYE

    34015/17 and 26896/18, § 67, 1 February 2024)?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht