Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,56065
EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.04.2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. April 2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,56065) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BAYSAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+2, Art. 13+3, Art. 13+5, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) partially dismissed Preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) partially joined to merits and dismissed Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 in respect of the failure to protect the ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (110)Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court has to establish, first, whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicant were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 220).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

    MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Government failed to specify the nature of the documents and the grounds on which they could not be disclosed (see, for similar conclusions, Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 104, 26 January 2006).
  • EGMR, 15.05.2001 - 58752/00

    ABRIAL ET AUTRES contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court also recalls that in a number of comparable cases reviewed and pending before the Court, similar requests have been made to the Russian Government and the documents from the investigation files have been submitted without a reference to Article 161 (see, for example, Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia cited above, § 46; Magomadov and Magomadov v. Russia (dec.), no. 58752/00, 24 November 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    In view of the Court's findings above with regard to Articles 2 and 3, these complaints are clearly "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

    ORHAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    It is especially in respect of the latter that a relative may claim directly to be a victim of the authorities' conduct (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

    LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see the Bazorkina v. Russia judgment, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, 9 November 2006; and Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, 9 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00

    KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    A civil court is unable to pursue any independent investigation and is incapable, without the benefit of the conclusions of a criminal investigation, of making any meaningful findings as to the perpetrators of fatal assaults, still less to establish their responsibility (see Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, § 119-121, 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see the Bazorkina v. Russia judgment, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, 9 November 2006; and Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, 9 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

    BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court recalls that it has developed a number of general principles relating to the establishment of facts in dispute and, in particular, when facing allegations of disappearance under Article 2 of the Convention (for a summary of these see Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, § 103-109, 27 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    Failure on a Government's part to submit such information which is in their hands, without a satisfactory explanation, may not only give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations, but may also reflect negatively on the level of compliance by a respondent State with its obligations under Article 38 § 1 (a) of the Convention (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 66, ECHR 2000-VI).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00
  • EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 20958/14

    EGMR zur Lage auf der Krim: Russland begeht schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen

    Rn. 962 Similarly, in the context of cases decided in relation to the conflict in Chechnya, the Court has concluded that when a person is detained by unidentified servicemen without any subsequent acknowledgement of detention, this can be regarded as life-threatening (see Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, § 119, 5 April 2007, and Beksultanova v. Russia, no. 31564/07, § 83, 27 September 2011).
  • EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06

    [ENG]

    Having regard to the numerous previous cases concerning disappearances in Chechnya and Ingushetia which have come before it, the Court has found that in the particular context of the conflict, when a person was detained by unidentified State agents without any subsequent acknowledgment of the detention, this could be regarded as life-threatening (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-VIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; Alikhadzhiyeva v. Russia, no. 68007/01, 5 July 2007; and Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 23608/16

    PETROVY v. RUSSIA

    The alleged failure to submit relevant information and documents does not raise an issue under Article 34 (see Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 201, ECHR 2005-IV, and Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, § 168, 5 April 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht