Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GHARIBASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 11830/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (18)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 73241/01

  DAVTIAN c. GEORGIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  It is the Court's well-established case-law that a separate complaint with the aim of holding State agents in charge of detained applicants criminally liable for alleged acts of ill-treatment is, in the normal course of events, an effective remedy (see, among many others, Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 1704/06, 26 June 2007; Davtian v. Georgia (dec.), no. 73241/01, 6 September 2005; Trubnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 49790/99, 14 October 2003).

  Going beyond the domestic authorities" findings of fact and applying a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, among other authorities, Talat Tepe v. Turkey, no. 31247/96, § 49, 21 December 2004), the Court itself is unable, in view of the meagre medical material in its possession (see paragraphs 11, 15 and 28 above) and on the sole basis of the applicant's assertions, to consider the impugned ill-treatment in custody an established fact "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Davtian v. Georgia, no. 73241/01, § 38, 27 July 2006; Danelia v. Georgia, no. 68622/01, §§ 42 and 43, 17 October 2006).

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  Notably, the enquiry was entrusted to the same division of the prosecution authority - the RDPO - of which the alleged perpetrator, Mr M., was a member, even though the applicant clearly objected to such an obvious conflict of interests (see Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 63, 19 May 2004; OÄŸur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  Furthermore, the prosecution authorities cannot be said to have conducted a thorough investigation, as the applicant himself was never interviewed during its progress (see Petropoulou-Tsakiris, cited above, §§ 50 and 53; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

  BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  The Court observes in this connection that a public and adversarial judicial review, even if the court in question is not competent to pursue an independent investigation or make any findings of fact, has the benefit of providing a forum guaranteeing the due process of law in contentious proceedings involving an ill-treatment case, to which the applicant and the prosecution authority are both parties (see Ramishvili and Kokhreidze, decision, cited above; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, § 61, 1 March 2007).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  Furthermore, the prosecution authorities cannot be said to have conducted a thorough investigation, as the applicant himself was never interviewed during its progress (see Petropoulou-Tsakiris, cited above, §§ 50 and 53; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 46430/99

  BARBU ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  For an investigation to be effective, it may generally be regarded as necessary for the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation to be independent from those implicated in the events (see Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, § 66, 5 October 2004).
• EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 42027/98

  TOTEVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  Notably, the enquiry was entrusted to the same division of the prosecution authority - the RDPO - of which the alleged perpetrator, Mr M., was a member, even though the applicant clearly objected to such an obvious conflict of interests (see Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 63, 19 May 2004; OÄŸur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 44803/04

  PETROPOULOU-TSAKIRIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  The Court considers that the applicant's allegations made before the domestic authorities contained enough specific information - the date, place and nature of the ill-treatment, the identity of the alleged perpetrators, the causality between the alleged beatings and the asserted health problems, etc., to constitute an arguable claim in respect of which those authorities were under an obligation to conduct an effective investigation (see Davtian, judgement cited above, § 42; Petropoulou-Tsakiris v. Greece, no. 44803/04, § 47, 6 December 2007).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  This investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3290, § 102; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03

  An obligation to investigate is not an obligation of result, but of means (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

  SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00

  KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• KAG Mainz, 25.11.2010 - M 29/10

  Höhergruppierung
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99

  TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 1704/06

  RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 21.12.2004 - 31247/96

  TALAT TEPE v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 04.12.2001 - 61892/00

  HILL v. SPAIN

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen