Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TALIADOROU ET STYLIANOU c. CHYPRE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3 MRK
  Partiellement irrecevable Non-violation de l'art. 6-2 Violation de l'art. 8 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TALIADOROU AND STYLIANOU v. CYPRUS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 6-2 Violation of Art. 8 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court considers that Article 8 is applicable to the applicants' complaint in that it concerned the protection of their moral and psychological integrity and of their reputation, all of which fall within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia, X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 63, Reports 1997-VIII; Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B).

  Respect for private life also comprises, to a certain degree, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B).

• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

  TYSIAC c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  This could require the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private life, including both the provision of a regulatory framework of adjudicatory and enforcement machinery protecting individuals' rights and the implementation, where appropriate, of specific measures (see Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 110, ECHR 2007-...; X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, § 23).
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 12277/04

  STORBR?TEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court considers that this provision is not applicable to the facts of the present case, since the relevant procedure followed was not criminal in nature (see Storbråten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277/04, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), and Mjelde v. Norway (dec.) 11143/04, 1 February 2007).

 
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 11143/04

  MJELDE v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court considers that this provision is not applicable to the facts of the present case, since the relevant procedure followed was not criminal in nature (see Storbråten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277/04, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), and Mjelde v. Norway (dec.) 11143/04, 1 February 2007).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court reiterates that once a case has been duly referred to it, it is entitled to examine every question of law arising in the course of the proceedings and concerning facts submitted to its examination in the light of the Convention and the Protocols as a whole (see, inter alia, Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 223, § 44, and Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 41, Series A no. 24).
• EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 44647/98

  PECK c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court has, on a number of occasions, ruled that "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court reiterates in the first place that the presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair trial that is required by paragraph 1. The presumption of innocence will be violated if a judicial decision or a statement by a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, § 56, Series A no. 35; Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, §§ 27 and 37, Series A no. 62; and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00

  SIDABRAS ET DZIAUTAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court has previously held that an interference affecting an individual's ability to engage in professional activities and creating serious difficulties for him in terms of earning his living might have, in certain circumstances, repercussions on the enjoyment of his private life (see, mutatis mutandis, Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 48, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court reiterates in the first place that the presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair trial that is required by paragraph 1. The presumption of innocence will be violated if a judicial decision or a statement by a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, § 56, Series A no. 35; Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, §§ 27 and 37, Series A no. 62; and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05

  The Court reiterates in the first place that the presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair trial that is required by paragraph 1. The presumption of innocence will be violated if a judicial decision or a statement by a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, § 56, Series A no. 35; Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, §§ 27 and 37, Series A no. 62; and Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308).
• EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

  VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 62902/00

  ZOLLMANN c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 58729/00

  ABEBERRY c. FRANCE

• EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1828/06

  G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  39627/05 and 39631/05, §§ 27 and 56-59, 16 October 2008; and Allen, cited above, §§ 93-94).
• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  39627/05 and 39631/05, §§ 27 and 56-59, 16 October 2008).
• EuG, 28.01.2015 - T-341/12

  Evonik Degussa / Kommission - Wettbewerb - Verwaltungsverfahren - Europäischer …

  Auch wenn aber die Kommission, soweit sie im Rahmen ihrer Untersuchung eines Verstoßes gegen das Kartellrecht der Union von Unternehmen Informationen einholt, diesen Artikel grundsätzlich zu wahren hat, kann sich doch nach ständiger Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte eine Person nicht auf Art. 8 EMRK berufen, um eine Schädigung ihres Rufs geltend zu machen, die in vorhersehbarer Weise aus ihren eigenen Handlungen wie etwa einer Straftat resultiert (vgl. EGMR, Urteile Sidabras und D?¾iautas/Litauen vom 27. Juli 2004, 1ndividualbeschwerden Nrn. 55480/00 und 59330/00, § 49, Recueil des arrêts et décisions , 2004-VIII, S. 367, Taliadorou und Stylianou/Zypern vom 16. Oktober 2008, 1ndividualbeschwerden Nrn. 39627/05 und 39631/05, § 56, und Gillberg/Schweden vom 3. April 2012, 1ndividualbeschwerde Nr. 41723/06, § 67).

 
• EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 4782/18

  Österreich verurteilt: Vorwürfe eines KZ-Überlebenden nicht geprüft

  However, in a case where the Supreme Court of Cyprus denied applicants equitable relief in respect of damage caused by an unlawful administrative act without sufficiently explaining its reasoning, the Court has found a violation of Article 8 (see Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627/05 and 39631/05, § 58, 16 October 2008).
• EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 3453/12

  KAPETANIOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Dans une certaine mesure, la protection offerte par l'article 6 § 2 à cet égard peut recouvrir celle qu'apporte l'article 8 (voir, par exemple, Zollmann c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62902/00, CEDH 2003-XII, et Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, §§ 27 et 56-59, 16 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 27785/10

  MELO TADEU c. PORTUGAL

  Dans une certaine mesure, la protection offerte par l'article 6 § 2 à cet égard peut recouvrir celle qu'apporte l'article 8 (voir, par exemple, Zollmann c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62902/00, CEDH 2003-XII, et Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, §§ 27 et 56-59, 16 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 4789/10

  GÖZÜM c. TURQUIE

  La Cour rappelle que l'article 8 ne se contente pas de commander à l'État de s'abstenir des ingérences arbitraires des pouvoirs publics: à cet engagement plutôt négatif peuvent s'ajouter des obligations positives impliquant l'adoption de mesures visant au respect de la vie privée et/ou familiale (Dickson c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 44362/04, § 70, CEDH 2007-V, et, s'agissant plus particulièrement de la vie familiale, voir Todorova c. Italie, no 33932/06, § 69, 13 janvier 2009) ainsi que la mise en place d'un système de protection efficace des droits correspondants (Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, § 49, 16 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 46878/06

  TEODOR c. ROUMANIE

  La jurisprudence constante de la Cour sur l'application de l'article 6 § 2 aux décisions judiciaires rendues consécutivement à une procédure pénale, close par abandon des poursuites ou décision d'acquittement notamment, concerne aussi les procédures relatives aux questions disciplinaires ou de licenciement (Moullet c. France (déc.), no 27521/04, 13 septembre 2007, Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, § 25, 16 octobre 2008, Sikic c. Croatie, no 9143/08, §§ 42-47, 15 juillet 2010, Çelik Bozkurt c. Turquie, no 34388/05), § 34, 12 avril 2011).
• EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 27801/12

  MARINONI c. ITALIE

  Dans une certaine mesure, la protection offerte par l'article 6 § 2 à cet égard peut recouvrir celle qu'apporte l'article 8 (voir, par exemple, Zollman c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62902/00, CEDH 2003-XII, et Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, §§ 27 et 56-59, 16 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 20148/09

  RIGOLIO c. ITALIE

  Dans une certaine mesure, la protection offerte par l'article 6 § 2 à cet égard peut recouvrir celle qu'apporte l'article 8 (voir, par exemple, Zollman c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 62902/00, CEDH 2003-XII, et Taliadorou et Stylianou c. Chypre, nos 39627/05 et 39631/05, §§ 27 et 56-59, 16 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 44546/13

  ISTRATE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 73911/16

  LARRAÑAGA ARANDO AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 23349/17

  PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO (No. 2)
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16

  MARTÍNEZ AGIRRE AND OTHERS v. SPAIN