Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr
Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1992,15251
EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86 (https://dejure.org/1992,15251)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.03.1992 - 12083/86 (https://dejure.org/1992,15251)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. März 1992 - 12083/86 (https://dejure.org/1992,15251)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1992,15251) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BELDJOUDI v. FRANCE

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 3, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 12, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14+8 3 9 and 12 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BELDJOUDI c. FRANCE

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 3, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 12, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'Art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner les art. 14+8 3 9 et 12 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • 55/1990/246/317
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (86)Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    The Court acknowledges that it is for the Contracting States to maintain public order, in particular by exercising their right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see the Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, para. 67, the Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, pp. 15-16, §§ 28-29, and the Moustaquim v. Belgium judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, para. 43).

    In the present case, as was rightly emphasised by the Government, Mr Beldjoudi's criminal record appears much worse than that of Mr Moustaquim (see the above-mentioned judgment, Series A no. 193, p. 19, para. 44).

    [6] Judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193.

  • EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    The Court acknowledges that it is for the Contracting States to maintain public order, in particular by exercising their right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see the Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, para. 67, the Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, pp. 15-16, §§ 28-29, and the Moustaquim v. Belgium judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, para. 43).

    [11] See paragraph 88 of the Court's Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985 (Series A no. 94, p. 41).

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

    Jens Söring

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    Nevertheless, the Court having found that the Minister's decision to deport Mr Beldjoudi would, if implemented, give rise to such a breach, Article 50 (art. 50) must be taken as applying to the facts of the present case (see, mutatis mutandis, the Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 49, para. 126).

    [] The present case differs in this respect from the Soering (Series A no. 161) and Cruz Varas (Series A no. 201) cases.

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    [12] For the idea that a person's personal history and memories may be said to fall within the sphere which has to be respected under Article 8 (art. 8), see the Court's Gaskin v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989 (Series A no. 160).
  • EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    [] The present case differs in this respect from the Soering (Series A no. 161) and Cruz Varas (Series A no. 201) cases.
  • EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    The Court acknowledges that it is for the Contracting States to maintain public order, in particular by exercising their right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see the Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, para. 67, the Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, pp. 15-16, §§ 28-29, and the Moustaquim v. Belgium judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, para. 43).
  • EGMR, 23.01.1991 - 13446/87
    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
    [] Note by the Registrar: case no. 34/1990/225/289, struck out of the list on 23 January 1991 following a friendly settlement (Series A no. 191-B).
  • EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 29217/12

    Rückführung einer afghanischen Familie nach Italien konventionskonform?

    137. The Court considers that its finding in paragraph 122 of the present judgment constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any nonpecuniary damage sustained by the applicants (see, to this effect, Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, §§ 79 and 86, Series A no. 234-A; M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 41416/08, §§ 105 and 143, 26 July 2011; and Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24328/13, § 50, 7 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 43611/11

    F.G. v. SWEDEN

    In any event, the Court considers that its finding of the present judgment constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant (see, to this effect, Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, § 137, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, §§ 79 and 86, Series A no. 234-A; M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 41416/08, §§ 105 and 143, 26 July 2011; and Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • BVerfG, 01.03.2004 - 2 BvR 1570/03

    Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Ausweisung eines in Deutschland geborenen und …

    Dabei wird oftmals die Kenntnis der Sprache des Herkunftsstaates als ein bedeutsamer Umstand - im Hinblick auf die Zumutbarkeit einer Integration in die dortigen Lebensverhältnisse - betont (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 26. März 1992 - 55/1990/246/317 - Fall Beldjoudi, EuGRZ 1993, S. 556;… Urteil vom 13. Juli 1995 - 18/1994/465/564 - Fall Nasri, InfAuslR 1996, S. 1; Urteil vom 24. April 1996 - 15/1995/522/608 - Fall Boughanemi; Urteil vom 29. Januar 1997 - 112/1995/618/708 - Fall Bouchelkia; Urteil vom 26. September 1997 - 123/1996/742/941 - Fall El Boujaidi;… Urteil vom 30. November 1999 - 34374/97 - Fall Baghli, NVwZ 2000, S. 1401;… Zulässigkeitsentscheidung vom 4. Oktober 2001 - 43359/98 - Fall Adam, EuGRZ 2002, S. 582), wenngleich der EGMR in einem Fall die Ausweisung nicht als unverhältnismäßig angesehen hat, obwohl der Beschwerdeführer fehlende Sprachkenntnisse geltend gemacht hatte (…vgl. Urteil vom 21. Oktober 1997 - 122/1996/741/940 - Fall Boujlifa, InfAuslR 1998, S. 1).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht