Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Zitiert selbst (22)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The distinction between a deprivation of liberty and a restriction thereof is merely one of degree or intensity and not one of nature or substance (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39, and Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 57, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The distinction between a deprivation of liberty and a restriction thereof is merely one of degree or intensity and not one of nature or substance (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39, and Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 57, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 4158/05

  GILLAN AND QUINTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The Court further points out that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, where applicants are stopped for the purposes of a search for a period which does not exceed thirty minutes (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010 (extracts)) or where the length of time during which the applicant was held at a police station did not exceed forty-five minutes (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, §§ 48-50, 21 June 2011).

• EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 16072/06

  FRIEND AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  16072/06 and 27809/08, § 50, 24 November 2009) and finds that this provision is applicable in the present case.
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A).
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 30194/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The Court further points out that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, where applicants are stopped for the purposes of a search for a period which does not exceed thirty minutes (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010 (extracts)) or where the length of time during which the applicant was held at a police station did not exceed forty-five minutes (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, §§ 48-50, 21 June 2011).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The Court reiterates that an interference will constitute a breach of Article 11 unless it is "prescribed by law", pursues one or more legitimate aims under paragraph 2, and is "necessary in a democratic society" for the achievement of those aims (see Djavit An, cited above, § 63; Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 44, 29 November 2007; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 37, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  Moreover, the Court reiterates that the right to freedom of assembly as protected under Article 11 of the Convention may cover both private and public meetings, including an assembly of an essentially social character (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, § 56, ECHR 2003-III, and Friend, the Countryside Alliance and others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  The Court reiterates that an interference will constitute a breach of Article 11 unless it is "prescribed by law", pursues one or more legitimate aims under paragraph 2, and is "necessary in a democratic society" for the achievement of those aims (see Djavit An, cited above, § 63; Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 44, 29 November 2007; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 37, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 25.09.2003 - 52792/99

  VASILEVA v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

  In this connection, the Court observes that it is apparent from the eyewitness statements of R.A. and M.H. that the applicant identified himself to the police as a journalist and the chairman of the IRFS (see paragraph 12 above) and did not refuse to disclose his identity to the police (see, by contrast, Vasileva v. Denmark, no. 52792/99, §§ 36-38, 25 September 2003).
• EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97

  ADALI v. TURKEY
• AG Mosbach, 22.06.1970 - C 120/70

  Schadensersatz wegen schuldhaft verursachtem Unfall mit Billigung einer …
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.04.2014 - 22062/07

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 5865/07

  BUTKEVICH v. RUSSIA

  It is uncontested that on the morning of 16 July 2006 the applicant was not acting on a journalistic assignment from any media outlet (compare with Pentikäinen, cited above, §§ 10 and 92, and Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 87 and 90, 7 May 2015; see also Selmani and Others, cited above, §§ 5, 61 and 73).
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 25501/07

  NOVIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

  The available submissions and material do not allow the Court to establish the relevant facts in this respect, for instance whether under domestic law the applicants were obliged to be in possession of an identity document and whether they refused to confirm their identities by appropriate means (see, for comparison, Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 87, 7 May 2015).
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 31581/16

  JABBAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, 8 July 2021, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Unlawful deprivation of liberty as a result of unrecorded and/or unacknowledged detention (see Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 54-68, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 81-88, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, §§ 42-54, 8 July 2021).

• EGMR, 30.04.2025 - 9747/14

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, 8 July 2021, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present cases.

  Unlawful deprivation of liberty as a result of unrecorded and/or unacknowledged detention (see Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 54-68, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 81-88, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, §§ 42-54, 8 July 2021).

• EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  (g) Emin Huseynov, director of IRFS, was ill-treated in detention (see Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, 7 May 2015), forced to flee the country and stripped of his citizenship.
• EGMR, 01.12.2020 - 46712/15

  BERKMAN v. RUSSIA

  In view of the essential nature of freedom of assembly and its close relationship with democracy, there must be convincing and compelling reasons to justify an interference with this right (see Adalı v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 267, 31 March 2005; Ouranio Toxo, cited above, § 36; and Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 97, 7 May 2015).
• EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 35432/07

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law set out in the judgments Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan (no. 59135/09, §§ 54-57, 7 May 2015) and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 34-37, 24 November 2016), which are equally pertinent to the present case.
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10

  NASIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A, and Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 84, 7 May 2015).
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17

  RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  However, neither the Government nor the domestic courts referred to any provisions of the national legislation setting out a requirement that a religious gathering on private premises could not take place without registration or to any domestic law or provisions which could constitute the legal basis for the dispersal of a gathering held in places which were in private ownership (see, mutatis mutandis, Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 98, 7 May 2015).
• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 52924/09

  IOAN POP ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Or elle a déjà conclu à la privation de liberté pour des durées bien inférieures (Gillan et Quinton c. Royaume-Uni, no 4158/05, § 57, CEDH 2010 (extraits), pour une durée de trente minutes ; Shimovolos c. Russie, no 30194/09, §§ 48-50, 21 juin 2011, pour une durée de quarante-cinq minutes ; et Emin Huseynov c. Azerbaïdjan, no 59135/09, § 83, 7 mai 2015, pour une durée de trois heures et trente minutes).
• EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 38283/18

  BOGAY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 60659/08

  KHALIL v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 65367/16

  ZELCS v. LATVIA
• EGMR - 59943/19 (anhängig)

  KARIMLI v. AZERBAIJAN