Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Positive ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BEIZARAS ET LEVICKAS c. LITUANIE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (72)Zitiert selbst (32)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Burka-Verbot: In Würde verschleiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  In that context it has held that although individual interests must on occasion be subordinated to those of a group, democracy does not simply mean that the views of the majority must always prevail: a balance must be achieved that ensures the fair and proper treatment of minorities and avoids any abuse of a dominant position (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 112, ECHR 1999-III; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 128, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Bączkowski and Others, cited above, §§ 61 and 63, with further references).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  Britische DNA-Datenbanken verstoßen gegen die Europäische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  Such elements as a person's sexual orientation and sexual life fall within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, among other authorities, S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008; for a broader context see also Van Kück v. Germany, no. 35968/97, § 78, 12 June 2003, on sexual self-determination constituting one of the aspects of a person's right to respect for his private life).
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  The Court has established in its case-law that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see, among many authorities, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007-IV, see also Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 135, 19 December 2018).

• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  In this regard, the Court notes that in cases involving complaints under Article 13, based on such allegations of discriminatory attitudes affecting the effectiveness of remedies in the application of generally applicable national laws, the Court has usually not considered it necessary to separately examine the complaints under that provision if a violation of Article 14, taken together with other Convention provisions, has already been found (see, in particular, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 205, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 22947/13

  News-Portal: Keine Haftung für Nutzerkommentare

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  The Court had likewise recognised that the "potential impact of the medium concerned was an important factor" (the Government referred to Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete and Index.hu Zrt v. Hungary, no. 22947/13, § 56, 2 February 2016).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  Denisov v. Ukraine

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  In order for Article 8 to come into play, however, an attack on a person must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see, mutatis mutandis, Delfi, cited above, § 137, with further references; also see, on the importance of analysis of the seriousness of the impugned interference for Article 8 to come into play in the context of different types of cases, Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 110-14, 25 September 2018).
• EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 67667/09

  "Homosexuellen-Propaganda"-Gesetz in Russland: Diskriminierend - und …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  In the present case, although the Klaipėda District Court cited the alleged incompatibility between maintaining family values as the foundation of society and acknowledging the social acceptance of homosexuality, the Court sees no reason to consider those elements as incompatible, especially in view of the growing general tendency to view relationships between same-sex couples as falling within the concept of "family life" (see Bayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 67667/09 and 2 others, § 67, 20 June 2017).
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28475/12

  RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  Differences based solely on considerations of sexual orientation are unacceptable under the Convention (see, more recently, Ratzenböck and Seydl v. Austria, no. 28475/12, § 32, 26 October 2017, and the case-law cited therein).
• EGMR, 08.07.2019 - 54012/10

  MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  The Court has also held that the provisions of the Convention must be interpreted and applied in a manner which renders their safeguards practical and effective, not theoretical and illusory (see, more recently, Mihalache v. Romania [GC], no. 54012/10, § 91, 8 July 2019).
• EGMR, 09.02.2012 - 1813/07

  Verurteilung wegen homophober Hate-Speech keine Verletzung der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  Attacks on persons committed by insulting, holding up to ridicule or slandering specific groups of the population can be sufficient for the authorities to favour combating racist speech in the face of freedom of expression exercised in an irresponsible manner (see Vejdeland and Others v. Sweden, no. 1813/07, § 55).
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35943/10

  VONA v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 34367/14

  Islamist scheitert mit Klage gegen Verurteilung wegen Hass-Aufrufes
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07

  Alexejew ./. Russland
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  R.B. v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 33290/96

  SALGUEIRO DA SILVA MOUTA c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 10851/13

  KIRÁLY AND DÖMÖTÖR v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 16853/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 35159/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 42615/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 45849/13

  ORLEN LIETUVA LTD. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 56975/09

  Christopher Donaldson ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  PANAYOTOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18

  WA BAILE c. SUISSE

  Rn. 69 En ce qui concerne l'aspect « vie privée'de l'article 8, 1a Cour a déjà eu l'occasion d'observer que cette notion est une notion large, non susceptible d'une définition exhaustive, et qu'elle peut parfois englober des aspects de l'identité physique et sociale d'un individu (Lacatus c. Suisse, no 14065/15, § 54, 19 janvier 2021, Glor c. Suisse, no 13444/04, § 52, CEDH 2009, Mikulić c. Croatie, no 53176/99, § 53, CEDH 2002-I, et Beizaras et Levickas c. Lituanie, no 41288/15, § 117, 14 janvier 2020).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 14065/15

  Lacatus ./. Schweiz - Bettelverbot unverhältnismäßig

  Souvent mentionnée sur le terrain de l'article 3, cette notion a également été évoquée à plusieurs reprises par la Cour sous l'angle de l'article 8 (voir notamment, Kučera c. Slovaquie, no 48666/99, § 122, 17 juillet 2007 ; Rachwalski et Ferenc c. Pologne, no 47709/99, § 73, 28 juillet 2009 ; El-Masri c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine [GC], no 39630/09, § 248, CEDH 2012 ; Khadija Ismayilova c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 65286/13 et 57270/14, § 116, 10 janvier 2019 ; Beizaras et Levickas c. Lituanie, no 41288/15, § 117, 14 janvier 2020 ; Vinks et Ribicka c. Lettonie, no 28926/10, § 114, 30 janvier 2020, et Hudorovič et autres c. Slovénie, nos 24816/14 et 25140/14, § 116, 10 mars 2020).
• EGMR, 23.01.2023 - 61435/19

  Verstoß gegen Meinungsfreiheit: Geschichten über gleichgeschlechtliche …

  The results of similar surveys dating from 2012 and 2015 have been summarised in Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania (no. 41288/15, §§ 63-64, 14 January 2020).

  In addition, following the Court's judgment in Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania (no. 41288/15, 14 January 2020), there had been an important shift in the practice of the domestic authorities, which were now taking all necessary measures to investigate allegations of hate speech on the grounds of sexual orientation.

• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 40792/10

  Russland will sich EGMR-Urteil widersetzen: Keine Kompromisse bei …

  It would be incompatible with the underlying values of the Convention, as an instrument of the European public order, if the exercise of Convention rights by a minority group were made conditional on its being accepted by the majority (see, mutatis mutandis, Alekseyev, cited above, § 81; Bayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 67667/09 and 2 others, § 70, 20 June 2017; and Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 122, 14 January 2020).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.06.2025 - C-769/22

  Werte der Union: Nach Auffassung von Generalanwältin Capeta hat Ungarn gegen das …

  {FN:51} EGMR, 14. Januar 2020, Beizaras und Levickas/Litauen (CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD004128815, § 109 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 29555/13

  F.O. v. CROATIA

  In order for Article 8 to come into play, however, an attack on a person must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109 in fine, 14 January 2020).

  In order for Article 8 to come into effect, an attack on a person must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109 in fine, 14 January 2020).

  I regret not to be able to agree with the majority of the Court that the treatment complained of by the applicant was in itself serious enough to give rise to an issue under Article 8 of the Convention (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109, 14 January 2020).

• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 39375/19

  VALAITIS v. LITHUANIA

  The Prosecutor General's Office underscored that all the above "principle aspects" (principiniai aspektai) had been mentioned in the Supreme Court's practice (rulings in cases nos. 2K-677/2012 and 2K-86-648/2016), and that those two Supreme Court rulings had been referred to by the Court in the judgment of Beizaras and Levickas (no. 41288/15, 14 January 2020), in which the Court had expressed its disquiet with such a practice on the part of the Supreme Court.

  Having regard to the Court's conclusions in Beizaras and Levickas (no. 41288/15, 14 January 2020), the Government did not question the applicability of Article 13 of the Convention to the circumstances of the present case, leaving the matter to the Court for a final decision.

  In my opinion, the judgment embarks on a review of the execution of the judgment given in Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania (no. 41288/15, 14 January 2020) rather than dealing with the specific case of the applicant whose complaint was before the Court.

• EGMR, 06.10.2026 - 42160/21
  In order for Article 8 to come into play, however, an attack on a person must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109 in fine, 14 January 2020).
• EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 19237/16

  ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Such elements as a person's sexual orientation and sexual life fall within the personal sphere protected by Article 8. In certain areas of private life (such as environmental issues and the right to reputation), in order for Article 8 to come into play, the Court considers that the alleged violation must attain a certain level of seriousness and be committed in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109, 14 January 2020; also see, on the importance of analysis of the seriousness of the impugned interference for Article 8 to come into play in the context of different types of cases, Denisov, cited above, § 110-114).

  In the context of hate speech, the Court has acknowledged that criminal sanctions, including against the individuals responsible for the most serious expressions of hatred, inciting others to violence, could be invoked only as an ultima ratio measure (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 111, 14 January 2020).

• EGMR, 09.11.2021 - 31549/18

  SPADIJER v. MONTENEGRO

  In order for Article 8 to come into play, however, an attack on a person must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to the personal enjoyment of the right to respect for one's private life (see Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 109 in fine, 14 January 2020).

  [10] No. 41288/15, 14 January 2020.

• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 40792/10

  Russland wegen Diskriminierung von Homosexuellen verurteilt - Russland wegen …
• EGMR, 18.07.2024 - 40861/22

  HANOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 31172/19

  JEHOVAN TODISTAJAT v. FINLAND
• EGMR - 25974/23 (anhängig)

  ÖZTÜRK v. TÜRKİYE
• EGMR - 26214/20 (anhängig)

  DANILOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR - 15023/21 (anhängig)

  KAOS GAY AND LESBIAN CULTURAL RESEARCH AND SOLIDARITY (KAOS GL) ASSOCIATION v. …
• EGMR, 29.08.2024 - 24622/22

  PASQUINELLI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 29335/13

  BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 57574/14

  MILOSAVLJEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12567/13

  BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 03.09.2026 - 5837/17

  NEW GENERATION HUMANITARIAN NGO v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 28.10.2025 - 34068/21

  GREENPEACE NORDIC AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 226/18

  Witali Walentinowitsch Milonow
• EGMR, 16.07.2026 - 7411/24

  KARICKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17

  Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …
• EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 73204/13

  WOMEN'S INITIATIVES SUPPORTING GROUP AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 20741/10

  X. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 39954/09

  ALEKSEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 70489/17

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 01.12.2020 - 46712/15

  BERKMAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 36908/13

  STEFANAC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 2933/23

  B.R. c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 15379/13

  CONSILIUL NAÈšIONAL AL TINERETULUI DIN MOLDOVA A.O. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 18179/17

  KARTER v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  EIGIRDAS v. LITHUANIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 37857/14

  YUSUFELI ILÇESINI GÜZELLESTIRME YASATMA KÜLTÜR VARLiKLARiNi KORUMA DERNEGI v. …
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 47274/19

  MILOSAVLJEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 3041/19

  G.T.B. v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 04.03.2025 - 75000/17

  MILASHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 71367/12

  OGANEZOVA v. ARMENIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 09.07.2024 - 16206/19

  SAVINOVSKIKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 58951/18

  C8 (CANAL 8) c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 68317/13

  MILJEVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 23.04.2024 - 42917/16

  ZAICESCU AND FALTICINEANU v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24225/19

  GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN …
• EGMR, 07.01.2025 - 59180/15

  MINASYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 23914/15

  GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 09.04.2026 - 910/18

  KIS AND LEVCHUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.02.2025 - 8825/22

  BAZHENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.09.2024 - 42711/13

  L'ASSOCIATION ONURHAN SOLMAZ ET TRIANGLE ROSE NOIR D'IZMIR DE RECHERCHES SUR …
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 81249/17

  ALLOUCHE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 60183/17

  PRICOPE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2025 - 9989/20

  STRAISTEANU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 09.09.2025 - 24729/17

  ILAREVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 32467/22

  MITTENDORFER v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR - 41094/20 (anhängig)

  MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR - 17553/17 (anhängig)

  ASOCIAŢIA OBŞTEASCĂ CENTRU DE INFORMAŢII GENDERDOC-M …
• EGMR, 11.09.2025 - 31652/21

  M.G. AND L.G. v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2025 - 35844/17

  SEYDI ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 29265/22

  D.J. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 41892/19

  THIBAUT c. FRANCE et 1 autre affaire
• EGMR, 26.10.2021 - 32934/19

  SALTINYTÄ- v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 27516/14

  PERELLÓ DOMENECH c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 45305/16

  GIULIANO v. HUNGARY
• EGMR - 11720/23 (anhängig)

  KANEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR - 57545/21 (anhängig)

  BOZHKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR - 14498/25 (anhängig)

  BLAGODYETYELYEVA-VOVK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.12.2025 - 9195/23

  SVIRPLYS AND LATVYS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 17766/16

  PUBLIC ASSOCIATION INFORMATION CENTER 'GENDERDOC-M' v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 11101/21

  P.R. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2023 - 23911/15

  PUBLIC ASSOCIATION 'INFORMATION CENTRE GENDERDOC-M' v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA