Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EL MAJJAOUI AND STICHTING TOUBA MOSKEE v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (solution of the matter) Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EL MAJJAOUI ET STICHTING TOUBA MOSKEE c. PAYS-BAS

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Radiation du rôle (solution du litige) Remboursement partiel frais et dépens (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 25525/03
• EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

Wird zitiert von ... (32)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

  Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 142, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ilacu and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.) [GC], no. 48787/99, 4 July 2001).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

  Eckle v. Germany , judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, pp.
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

  Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 142, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ilacu and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.) [GC], no. 48787/99, 4 July 2001).
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

  Amuur v. France , judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 846, § 36; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI;.
• EGMR, 04.10.2006 - 76642/01

  ASSOCIATION SOS ATTENTATS ET DE BOERY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 25525/03

  Association SOS Attentats and De Boëry v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 76642/01, § 41, ECHR 2006-...).

• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 23459/03

  BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA

  Dans plusieurs affaires (voir Syssoyeva et autres c. Lettonie [GC], no 60654/00, CEDH 2007-II, Chevanova c. Lettonie (radiation) [GC], no 58822/00, 7 décembre 2007, et El Majjaoui et Stichting Touba Moskee c. Pays-Bas (radiation) [GC], no 25525/03, 20 décembre 2007), la Cour a estimé que la question à l'origine des griefs des requérants pouvait désormais être considérée comme « résolue'au sens de l'article 37 § 1 b) de la Convention et elle a rayé les requêtes du rôle.
• EGMR, 03.10.2008 - 44574/98

  Kovacic u. a. ./. Slowenien

  The Court reiterates that the general principles governing the reimbursement of costs under Rule 43 § 4 are essentially the same as under Article 41 of the Convention (see, as a recent authority, El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, § 39, 20 December 2007).
• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 45434/12

  J.B. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In this connection, the Court also emphasises that, depending on the events that have occurred subsequent to the lodging of an application, it may strike a case out of its list on one or more of the grounds set out in Article 37 of the Convention, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant can still claim "victim" status (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 39, 24 October 2002), or even irrespective of the question whether the applicant can still claim such status (see Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 96, ECHR 2007-I; Association SOS Attentats and de Boëry v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 76642/01, § 41, ECHR 2006-XIV; Kaftailova v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 59643/00, § 47, 7 December 2007; and El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, § 29, 20 December 2007).

 
• EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 1464/14

  LUCZKIEWICZ v. POLAND

  In order to ascertain whether that provision applies to the present case, the Court must examine, firstly, whether the circumstances complained of directly by an applicant still obtain and, secondly, whether the effects of a possible violation of the Convention on account of those circumstances have also been redressed (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 42, 24 October 2002; Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, §§ 96-97, ECHR 2007-I; El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, §§ 29-30, 20 December 2007; and, most recently, Vadalà v. Italy (dec.), no. 14656/15, § 37, 7 November 2023).
• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 14656/15

  VADALÀ v. ITALY

  In order to ascertain whether that provision applies to the present case, the Court must examine, firstly, whether the circumstances complained of directly by an applicant still obtain and, secondly, whether the effects of a possible violation of the Convention on account of those circumstances have also been redressed (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 42, 24 October 2002; Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, §§ 96-97, ECHR 2007-I; and El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, §§ 29-30, 20 December 2007).
• EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 31469/08

  DANILEVICH v. RUSSIA

  The Court is satisfied that both conditions for the application of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention are met (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 42, 24 October 2002; Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, §§ 96-103, ECHR 2007-I; and El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, §§ 29-34, 20 December 2007).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 45293/06

  ATMACA v. GERMANY

  Daher bestehen die von dem Beschwerdeführer gerügten Umstände fort und die Streitigkeit ist somit nicht "einer Lösung zugeführt worden" (…im Hinblick auf die in der Spruchpraxis des Gerichtshof in diesem Zusammenhang festgelegten Kriterien siehe u. a. Pisano ./. Italien (Streichung) [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 36732/97, Rdnr. 42, 24. Oktober 2002;… Sisojeva u. a. ./. Lettland (Streichung) [GK],Individualbeschwerde Nr. 60654/00, Rdnr. 97, ECHR 2007-I; und El Majjaoui und Stichting Touba Moskee ./. die Niederlande (Streichung) [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 25525/03, Rdnr. 30, 20.
• EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 6936/03

  STAN c. ROUMANIE

  Ainsi, la Cour rappelle qu'une décision ou une mesure favorable au requérant ne suffit en principe aÌ? lui retirer la qualité de «victime» que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Amuur c. France, arrêt du 25 juin 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36, Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], no 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999-VI, Labita c. Italie [GC], no 26772/95, § 142, CEDH 2000-IV, et El Majjaoui et Stichting Touba Moskee c. Pays-Bas (radiation) [GC], no 25525/03, § 28, 20 décembre 2007).
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 1752/14

  DEBOWSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  The Court finds therefore that both conditions for the application of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention are met (see El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, §§ 30-34, 20 December 2007, and Vadalà v. Italy (dec.), no. 14656/15, § 35, 7 November 2023).
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 2059/16

  HASANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  However, the Court's case-law also shows that it will examine events that have occurred subsequent to the lodging of an application with a view to determining whether the case should be struck out of its list on one or more of the grounds set out in Article 37 of the Convention, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant can still claim "victim" status (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 39, 24 October 2002), or even irrespective of the question whether the applicant can still claim such status (see Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 96, ECHR 2007-I; Association SOS Attentats and De Boëry v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 76642/01, § 41, ECHR 2006-XIV; and El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, § 29, 20 December 2007).
• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 30502/12

  LORENZO VÁZQUEZ c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2360/03

  ÇIÇEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 15605/09

  SHEYKHZADE ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 25.05.2010 - 25074/09

  P. M. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 19.05.2009 - 34425/04

  STOJANOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 69817/12

  GRAND ORIENT D'ITALIE DE PALAZZO GIUSTINIANI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 8243/15

  PARTI POLITIQUE 'PATRIA' c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 51914/19

  TELIATNIKOV v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 48460/16

  BUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 39350/11

  MAKOVCHUK c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 21359/12

  O.A.M. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 7305/10

  B.M. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 20388/12

  H.O. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 34886/06

  GORYACHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 31201/11

  L.T. c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 54605/10

  I.A.A. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 15935/11

  M.M. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 06.09.2011 - 41608/08

  MIKHAEL RASHU c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1706/06

  STROGANOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 49662/07

  GHADERYPOOR v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2074/11

  SAHIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 33847/11

  TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND VAN DER GRAAF v. THE …