Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHUZHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-2 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P1-1 Just satisfaction dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (68)Zitiert selbst (18)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  Article 6 § 1 leaves to the State a free choice of the means to be used in guaranteeing litigants these rights (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 59-60, ECHR 2005-II).
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 31457/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court considers that where a photograph published in the context of reporting on pending criminal proceedings has no information value in itself, there must be compelling reasons to justify an interference with the defendant's right to respect for his private life (compare News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 58 et passim, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 71678/01

  GOURGUÉNIDZÉ c. GÉORGIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that the concept of private life includes elements relating to a person's right to his or her image and that the publication of a photograph falls within the scope of private life (see Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no. 71678/01, § 55, 17 October 2006; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, § 29, ECHR 2005-I; and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, §§ 50-53, ECHR 2004-VI).

• EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

  AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court observes that the charging of the car amounted to a temporary restriction on its use and thus fell under the scope of the second paragraph of Article 1 concerning "a control of the use of property" (see Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 May 1995, Series A no. 316-A, § 34).
• EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 50774/99

  SCIACCA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that the concept of private life includes elements relating to a person's right to his or her image and that the publication of a photograph falls within the scope of private life (see Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no. 71678/01, § 55, 17 October 2006; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, § 29, ECHR 2005-I; and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, §§ 50-53, ECHR 2004-VI).
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that the principle of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms, which is one of the elements of the broader concept of a fair hearing, requires that each party be given a reasonable opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed or evidence adduced by the other party and to present his case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent (see Krcmár and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 35376/97, § 39, 3 March 2000, and Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, § 33).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that in various cases where an applicant has died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before it (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of the fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, § 35).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62) but also covers statements made by other public officials about pending criminal investigations which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; and Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

  DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48297/99

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 03.03.2000 - 35376/97

  KRCMAR AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01

  NESTAK v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 69889/01

  GROSHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01

  KOVALEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2005 - 72701/01

  YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• BGH, 14.10.2015 - 1 StR 56/15

  Fall Mollath: Revision des Angeklagten als unzulässig verworfen

  Dabei hat der Gerichtshof der konkreten Wortwahl der jeweils angegriffenen Entscheidung maßgebliche Bedeutung beigemessen und diese im Kontext mit der gegebenen Verfahrenslage gewürdigt (vgl. EGMR, Slg. 2000-X Nr. 39, 41 - Daktaras/Litauen; EGMR, NJW 2004, 43 Nr. 54, 56 - Böhmer/Deutschland; EGMR, Urteil vom 27. Februar 2007 - 65559/01 Nr. 88 f. - Neš?ák/Slowakei; EGMR, Urteil vom 23. Oktober 2008 - 13470/02 Nr. 94 - Khuzhin u.a./Russland; EGMR, Urteil vom 2. Juni 2009 - 24528/02 Nr. 45 ff. - Borovský/Slowakei).
• EGMR, 17.09.2024 - 16678/22

  C.O. v. GERMANY

  Oktober 2002; und Khuzhin u. a. ./. Russland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 13470/02, Rn. 94, 23.
• EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 17103/10

  Verletzung des Grundsatzes der Unschuldsvermutung gegenüber einem türkischen …

  Der Gerichtshof hat in diesem Zusammenhang die Bedeutung betont, die der Wortwahl von Amtsträgern bei Äußerungen zukommt, die diese tätigen, bevor eine Person wegen einer bestimmten Straftat verurteilt worden ist (…siehe Daktaras , a. a. O., Rdnr. 41;… B. , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 54 und 56; Nesťák ./. Slowakei , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 65559/01, Rdnrn. 88 und 89, 27. Februar 2007; Khuzhin u. a. ./. Russland , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 13470/02, Rdnr. 94, 23. Oktober 2008;… und Borovský , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 45 f.).

• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12

  Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention

  ვინáƒ�იდáƒ�ნ áƒáƒ�რმáƒ�ჩენილიáƒ�, რáƒ�მ ჩáƒ�რევáƒ� áƒ�რემáƒ.áƒ�ხურებáƒ�დáƒ� "ლეგიტიმურმიáƒ-áƒ�ნáƒ.", áƒ�რáƒ�რიáƒ. áƒ�უცილებელი, ჩáƒ�ტáƒ�რდეáƒ. გáƒ�მáƒ�ძიებáƒ�, იყáƒ� თუ áƒ�რეáƒ. "áƒ�უცილებელი დემáƒ�კრáƒ�ტიულ áƒ.áƒ�áƒ-áƒ�გáƒ�დáƒ�ებáƒ�ში" (იხ. ხუჟინი დáƒ� áƒ.ხვები რუáƒ.ეთიáƒ. áƒáƒ˜áƒœáƒ�áƒ�ღმდეგ, N 13470/02, § 117, 2008 áƒáƒšáƒ˜áƒ. 23 áƒ�ქტáƒ�მბერი).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03

  SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA

  The Court has previously found a violation of the right to a "public and fair hearing" in a case where a Russian court, after having refused leave to appear to the imprisoned applicants, who had wished to make oral submissions on their defamation claim, failed to consider other legal possibilities for securing their effective participation in the proceedings (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, §§ 53 et seq., 23 October 2008).

  Hence, the applicant was obviously unable to decide on a further course of action for the defence of his rights until such time as the decision refusing him leave to appear was communicated to him (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 107, 23 October 2008).

• EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 3594/19

  KÖVESI v. ROMANIA

  In cases where it had concluded that the interference did not pursue a "legitimate aim", the Court found a violation of the Convention without further investigating whether that interference was "necessary in a democratic society" (see, for instance and in the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention, Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 117, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 13173/02

  MUKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has previously found a violation of the right to a "public and fair hearing" in a case where a Russian court, after refusing the imprisoned applicants leave to appear when they had sought to make oral submissions on their defamation claim, failed to consider other legal possibilities for securing their effective participation in the proceedings (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, §§ 53 et seq., 23 October 2008).

  Thus, the applicant was obviously unable to decide on a further course of action for the defence of his rights until such time as the decision refusing him leave to appear was communicated to him (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 107, 23 October 2008) and the appellate court did nothing to remedy that situation.

• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05

  [ENG]

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 51111/07

  Prozess gegen Kreml-Kritiker Chodorkowski war "unfair"

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 6091/06

  [FRE]

  La Cour a souligné à plusieurs reprises que le choix des termes employés par les agents de l'État dans les déclarations qu'ils formulent avant qu'une personne n'ait été jugée et reconnue coupable d'une infraction revêt une importance particulière (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Daktaras, no 42095/98, § 41, 10 octobre 2000, Arrigo et Vieille c. Malte (déc.), no 6569/04, 10 mai 2005, et Khoujine et autres c Russie, no 13470/02, § 94, 23 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 3242/03

  GLADKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 27236/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 20899/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 14146/02

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17

  Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 2840/10

  OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

  MITYANIN v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 5605/04

  KARPENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 36705/16

  MARGARI v. GREECE
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03

  ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 17053/20

  BAVCAR v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33468/03

  Verletzung der Unschuldsvermutung eines Verstorbenen durch gerichtliche …
• EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 10089/18

  KAYA c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 47186/21

  GOR? E v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 2641/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7259/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 13579/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 28370/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 12106/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 13772/05

  LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 4871/03

  SKOROBOGATYKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 73455/11

  SIDIKOVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 11643/20

  ISPIRYAN v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 16115/13

  MARGARETIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 19673/03

  GRYAZNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.06.2025 - 34067/23

  BOU? A v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 20383/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 40523/08

  PESA v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 33955/08

  BELOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 56795/13

  BAURAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 22254/14

  ERMÉNYI v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 55659/14

  RUDYKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.05.2025 - 45735/21

  BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 38958/07

  PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 23319/08

  NEAGOE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 50098/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.03.2010 - 28245/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 58359/12

  Y v. SLOVAKIA and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 475/08

  EILDERS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 3189/07

  NAZARENKO c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 24.04.2025 - 9654/24

  A.M. c. MONACO
• EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 2055/15

  VASILIADIS c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 32013/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 27359/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 15034/02

  LARIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 23243/03

  SOKUR v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 30782/03

  KOZLOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 493/15

  VOICULESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 20437/05

  SHAGIN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 49670/13

  KUKAJ v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 55382/07

  AILDERS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA