Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 14+3 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
- EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ciorcan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29414/09 and 44841/09, § 157, 27 January 2015; and Nachova and Others, cited above, § 147). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
The Court also points out that where an individual is in good health when taken into police custody but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
Moreover, it is not normally within the province of the Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269).
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
Indeed, the authorities were under the obligation to investigate a possible causal link between the alleged racist attitudes exhibited by the police officers and the abuse suffered by I.B. at their hands (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 60, 24 July 2012). - EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01
MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 107, 26 January 2006). - EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
The Court reiterates that where an individual makes a credible assertion that he has suffered treatment infringing Article 3 at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State, that provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in... [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 317, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Labita, cited above, § 131). - EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 4672/02
FARBTUHS c. LETTONIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 54, 2 December 2004; Bazjaks v. Latvia, no. 71572/01, § 74, 19 October 2010; and Krivošejs v. Latvia, no. 45517/04, § 69, 17 January 2012). - EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01
BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 54, 2 December 2004; Bazjaks v. Latvia, no. 71572/01, § 74, 19 October 2010; and Krivošejs v. Latvia, no. 45517/04, § 69, 17 January 2012). - EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 58478/00
RUPA c. ROUMANIE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
However, it reiterates that the fact that it is impossible to establish the exact circumstances in which a person was injured while under the control of the authorities does not prevent the Court from finding a violation of the substantive branch of Article 3, where the Government failed to prove in a convincing and satisfactory manner how the injuries were sustained (see Rupa v. Romania (no. 1), no. 58478/00, § 100, 16 December 2008). - EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 20546/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
Failure to make a distinction in the way situations that are essentially different are handled may constitute unjustified treatment irreconcilable with Article 14 of the Convention (see Ciorcan and Others, cited above, § 158; Nachova and Others, cited above, § 160, and Makhashevy v. Russia, no. 20546/07, §§ 138 and 144, 31 July 2012). - EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 45517/04
KRIVOSEJS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 9258/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 25762/07
Schwizgebel ./. Schweiz: Diskriminierung eines Adoptionsbewerbers wegen des …
- EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02
STOICA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 55929/00
MARIE-LOUISE LOYEN ET AUTRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 15250/02
BEKOS AND KOUTROPOULOS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 45823/08
IOANNIS ANASTASIADIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 16965/10
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 5977/03
MAKRI ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 9035/06
KABUROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 6235/04
ROGOJINA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 60103/11
STEPANIAN c. ROUMANIE
Ces requérants doivent montrer un intérêt moral fort, mis à part l'éventuel intérêt pécuniaire qu'ils pourraient avoir à l'issue des procédures internes, ou d'autres raisons impérieuses, par exemple un intérêt général important qui exige que l'affaire soit examinée (Boacă et autres c. Roumanie, no 40355/11, §§ 45-50, 12 janvier 2016 et Kaburov c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 9035/06, § 56, 19 juin 2012).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11, 59254/13, 68842/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOACA ET AUTRES ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA ROUMANIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOACA AND OTHERS AND 2 OTHER CASES AGAINST ROMANIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
- EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11, 59254/13, 68842/13
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Zitiert selbst (5)
- KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
15/06/2016. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.02.2005 - 12/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
12/04/2016. - SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
15/12/2015. - EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 68842/13
MARINESCU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
68842/13. - EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 59254/13
CONSTANTINESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11
59254/13.
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19
Diskriminierung: Deutschland hat Racial-Profiling-Vorwurf nicht genug geprüft
The authorities must do what is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, explore all practical means of discovering the truth and deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of racially induced violence (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 58, 24 July 2012; Boac and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, §§ 105-06, 12 January 2016; Burlya and Others, cited above, § 128; and Sabali v. Croatia, no. 50231/13, §§ 94 and 98, 14 January 2021, with further references). - EGMR, 16.04.2019 - 48474/14
LINGURAR v. ROMANIA
The relevant international material concerning the situation of Roma in Romania is described in Boacă and Others v. Romania (no. 40355/11, §§ 35-40, 12 January 2016).The Court refers to the general principles set out in its case-law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment and the requirement of an effective investigation into such allegations, as enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Boacă and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, §§ 66-67, 74-75 and 81-84, 12 January 2016; and Samachişă v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 59-64, 16 July 2015).
- EGMR, 16.07.2026 - 28273/23
S.T. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
The Court cannot overlook the many international reports (see paragraphs 115-120 above) or its own extensive case-law documenting persistent police violence against Roma people (see, among others, Sládková v. the Czech Republic, no. 15741/15, 10 November 2022; M.B. and Others v. Slovakia, no. 45322/17, 1 April 2021; M.B. and Others v. Slovakia (no. 2), no. 63962/19, 7 February 2023; R.R. and R.D. v. Slovakia, no. 20649/18, 1 September 2020; Mižigárová v. Slovakia, no. 74832/01, 14 December 2010; P.H. v. Slovakia, no. 37574/19, 8 September 2022; Boacă and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, 12 January 2016; Nachova and Others, cited above; Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI; Stoica, cited above; Ciorcan and Others, cited above; and Lingurar, cited above). - EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 40374/11
BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
The Court has already had the opportunity to assess the applicants' victim status in Boacă and Others v. Romania (no. 40355/11, §§ 41-52, 12 January 2016), which concerned another set of criminal proceedings for alleged police brutality against I.B. The victim's children had pursued the domestic proceedings on his behalf and then lodged the application with the Court.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".