Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MYUMYUN v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MYUMYUN c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (21)Zitiert selbst (18)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  The Court has already expressed concern that the offence of bodily harm under Articles 128-30 of the Bulgarian Criminal Code (see paragraph 28 above) does not appear sufficiently to take into account psychological suffering (see Hristovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42697/05, § 95, 11 October 2011, and Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 91, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It should be noted in this connection that the national authorities cannot be expected to discharge their positive obligations under Article 3 of the Convention by acting in breach of the requirements of its Article 7, one of which is that the criminal law must not be construed extensively to an accused's detriment (see, among many other authorities, Başkaya and Okçuoğlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 36, ECHR 1999-IV; Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376/04, § 185, ECHR 2010; and Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, § 78, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 7888/03

  NIKOLOVA AND VELICHKOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It cannot therefore be said that this aspect of the proceedings showed a lack of determination on the part of the authorities to hold the officers to account (contrast Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 59, 20 December 2007; Filipovi v. Bulgaria, no. 24867/04, §§ 69-70, 4 December 2012; and Lenev, cited above, § 124).

• EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 32446/96

  ABDULSAMET YAMAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  The Court has also held that where State agents have been charged with offences involving ill-treatment, they should be suspended from duty while being investigated or tried and dismissed if convicted (see, among other authorities, Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004; Gäfgen, cited above, § 125; and Cestaro, cited above, § 210).
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It is true that in a more recent case it criticised the Bulgarian prosecuting authorities for failing to consider whether to bring charges under Article 287 in a clear case of ill-treatment of a suspect in the course of custodial interrogation which had led to confessions later used in the trial against him (see Lenev, cited above, § 123, as well as Velev v. Bulgaria, no. 43531/08, § 61, 16 April 2013).
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 16117/02

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  However, in the light of its rulings in similar cases (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 124; Darraj v. France, no. 34588/07, § 49, 4 November 2010; Austrianu v. Romania, no. 16117/02, §§ 73-74, 12 February 2013; and Doiciu v. Romania, no. 1454/09, §§ 27 and 68-69, 5 May 2015, in all of which mere fines were found inadequate even in relation to inhuman and degrading treatment), the Court finds that these penalties were manifestly disproportionate to the seriousness of the officers' act.
• EGMR, 05.05.2015 - 1454/09

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  However, in the light of its rulings in similar cases (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 124; Darraj v. France, no. 34588/07, § 49, 4 November 2010; Austrianu v. Romania, no. 16117/02, §§ 73-74, 12 February 2013; and Doiciu v. Romania, no. 1454/09, §§ 27 and 68-69, 5 May 2015, in all of which mere fines were found inadequate even in relation to inhuman and degrading treatment), the Court finds that these penalties were manifestly disproportionate to the seriousness of the officers' act.
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 24867/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It cannot therefore be said that this aspect of the proceedings showed a lack of determination on the part of the authorities to hold the officers to account (contrast Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 59, 20 December 2007; Filipovi v. Bulgaria, no. 24867/04, §§ 69-70, 4 December 2012; and Lenev, cited above, § 124).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Its prohibition against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is thus absolute, irrespective of the circumstances or the conduct of the person concerned, in particular whether he or she has committed or is suspected of committing an offence (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 116, ECHR 2006-IX; and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 87, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11

  Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  For a detailed recapitulation of its case-law on this point, the Court refers to its recent judgment in Cestaro v. Italy (no. 6884/11, §§ 171-76, 7 April 2015), where it reviewed in detail how different factors - such as the gravity and duration of the treatment, the intention behind it, and the physical and psychological effects on the victim - had underpinned its findings in various cases.
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 30033/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 13424/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 57980/11

  ZHYZITSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 31939/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 51671/07

  [ENG]
• RFH, 17.10.1944 - I 54/44

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 50231/13

  SABALIC v. CROATIA

  (iii) In cases of manifest disproportion between the gravity of the act and the results obtained at domestic level, fostering sense that acts of ill-treatment remained ignored by the relevant authorities and that there was a lack of effective protection against acts of ill-treatment (see Beganović, cited above, §§ 78-79; and Identoba and Others, cited above, § 75; see further, for instance, Atalay v. Turkey, no. 1249/03, § 44, 18 September 2008; Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 141, 29 July 2010; Darraj v. France, no. 34588/07, §§ 48-49, 4 November 2010; Derman v. Turkey, no. 21789/02, § 28, 31 May 2011; Zontul v. Greece, no. 12294/07, §§ 106-109, 17 January 2012; and Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 75, 3 November 2015).
• EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 63638/14

  POSEVINI v. BULGARIA

  Also, the hourly rate charged by the applicants' legal representatives is higher than those charged in recent cases against Bulgaria of similar or greater complexity (see Dimitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77938/11, § 185, 1 July 2014 (EUR 60 per hour); Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 83, 3 November 2015 (EUR 100 per hour); and Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, § 86, 21 April 2016 (EUR 80 per hour)).
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 29335/13

  BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA

  It notes that the hourly rate charged by the applicants' representatives for their work is the same as that charged in respect of two relatively recent cases against Bulgaria (see Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 83, 3 November 2015, and Tomov and Nikolova v. Bulgaria, no. 50506/09, § 66, 21 July 2016).

• EGMR, 28.04.2026 - 45864/22

  KANEV AND BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE v. BULGARIA

  It is settled that (a) applicants are entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only if they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum, and that (b) costs or expenses incurred to prevent the breach of the Convention or obtain redress for it through the domestic legal order are also recoverable under Article 41 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 85, 3 November 2015; see also paragraphs 15 and 18-19 of the Practice Direction on Just Satisfaction Claims (as amended in June 2022).
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28923/09

  AZZOLINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE et 1 autre affaire

  En effet, aux yeux de la Cour, l'origine du problème réside dans le fait qu'aucune des infractions pénales existantes n'apparaît à même d'englober toute la gamme de questions soulevées par un acte de torture dont un individu risque d'être victime (Myumyun c. Bulgarie, no 67258/13, § 77, 3 novembre 2015).
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12567/13

  BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. BULGARIA

  It notes that the hourly rate charged by the applicants' representatives for their work is the same as that charged in respect of two relatively recent cases against Bulgaria (see Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 83, 3 November 2015, and Tomov and Nikolova v. Bulgaria, no. 50506/09, § 66, 21 July 2016).
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05

  MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Having regard to the specific type of ill-treatment perpetrated by trained police officers with the sole aim of obtaining a confession from the first applicant - the administration of electric shocks and beating with an iron padlock - the Court considers it to be a serious abuse of the applicant's physical integrity and dignity, which thus falls to be characterised as torture within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Pomilyayko v. Ukraine, no. 60426/11, § 51, 11 February 2016; Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 62, 3 November 2015; Grigoryev v. Ukraine, no. 51671/07, § 64, 15 May 2012, and Polonskiy v. Russia, no. 30033/05, § 124, 19 March 2009).
• EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 41488/98

  VELIKOVA CONTRE LA BULGARIE ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  67258/13.
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 2539/13

  CIRINO v. ITALY and 1 other application

  The latter offences appear, in the Court's view, incapable of addressing the full range of issues ensuing from the acts of torture which the applicants suffered (see Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 77, 3 November 2015).
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 1442/14

  BLAIR ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  En effet, aux yeux de la Cour, l'origine du problème réside dans le fait qu'aucune des infractions pénales existantes n'apparaît à même d'englober toute la gamme de questions soulevées par un acte de torture dont un individu risque d'être victime (Myumyun c. Bulgarie, no 67258/13, § 77, 3 novembre 2015).
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 46248/07

  SHESTOPALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 53891/20

  A.E. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 2265/12

  VARDANYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 6406/21

  M.G. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 56070/18

  STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.11.2025 - 42199/22

  ZAKAIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 9183/09

  BAROVOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 39254/10

  PIRGURBAN v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 30.04.2026 - 30272/25
• EGMR, 22.09.2022 - 40057/11

  MELIKSETYAN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR - 30667/24 (anhängig)

  ŞIRIN v. TÜRKİYE