Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ELVIRA DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 13+11 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (30)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  As regards the Government's argument that the applicant had not produced a legal fee agreement with Mr Terekhov and that the legal fee agreement with Ms Khrunova was invalid, the Court has already found in a similar situation that, given that Russian legislation provides that a contract on consulting services may be concluded in an oral form (Article 153 read in conjunction with Article 779 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), and irrespective of the fact that the applicant had not yet paid the legal fees, they were real from the standpoint of the Convention (see Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 147, ECHR 2005-IV, and Lashmankin and Others, cited above, § 521).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 101, ECHR 2012; and Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 48, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  Such are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.

 
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  The Court reiterates that it is normally not sufficient that the interference was imposed because its subject-matter fell within a particular category or was caught by a legal rule formulated in general or absolute terms; what is rather required is that it was necessary in the specific circumstances (see Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 275, ECHR 2015 (extracts), and The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 65 in fine, Series A no. 30).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  At the same time, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Kud??a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 157 and 158, ECHR 2000 XI, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 96, 10 January 2012).
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

  FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  There is therefore little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on expression on matters of public interest (see Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV) and very strong reasons are required for justifying such restrictions (see Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 83, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Sergey Kuznetsov, cited above, § 47, with further references).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  There is therefore little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on expression on matters of public interest (see Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV) and very strong reasons are required for justifying such restrictions (see Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 83, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Sergey Kuznetsov, cited above, § 47, with further references).
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 38380/08

  V.K. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  The Court reiterates in this connection that the obligation of the States under Article 13 also encompasses a duty to ensure that the competent authorities enforce remedies when granted, and notes that it has already found violations on account of a State's failure to observe that requirement (see Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 66, ECHR 1999-II; Öneryildiz v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 152, ECHR 2004-XII; and V.K. v. Croatia, no. 38380/08, §§ 112-17, 27 November 2012).

• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 40953/21

  LEVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; and Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 1469/19

  POTAPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, as to administrative conviction for making calls to participate in public assemblies; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
• EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 53913/15

  BORISOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, as to administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; mutatis mutandis, Tatár and Fáber v. Hungary, nos.

 
• EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 50067/18

  BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events.
• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18

  ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; Mariya Alekhina and Others v. Russia, no. 38004/12, §§ 197-201, 17 July 2018, and Bouton v. France, no. 22636/19, §§ 42-68, 13 October 2022, concerning restrictions of performance as a sign of protest; Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 28-38, 20 July 2021, related to the administrative conviction for waving banners with slogans that did not correspond to the declared aims of the public event; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 178-88, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65, as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.
• EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 24722/18

  SLIVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events.
• EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 71114/17

  OLSHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events.
• EGMR - 143/18 (anhängig)

  RYBAKOV v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications

  10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - arrest, conviction under article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 10 days for publishing on 16/09/2020 a call for participation in an opposition event (scheduled for 19-20/09/2020) to the applicant's vkontakte page, final judgment of 29/10/2020 by the Krasnodar Regional Court (see Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019).

  10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - arrest, conviction under article 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 25 days for publishing on 28/10/2017 a call for participation in an opposition event (scheduled for 29/10/2017) to the applicant's vkontakte page, final judgment of 11/11/2017 by the Tambov Regional Court (see Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019).

• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 46570/18

  NURUSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that in the present case the questions of lawfulness and of the existence of a legitimate aim cannot be dissociated from the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society" (see S. and Marper, cited above, § 99; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, § 75, 31 July 2014; and Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, § 77, 30 April 2019).
• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 4815/18

  KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 32174/21

  YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13

  MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 12800/17 (anhängig)

  IVANOVA v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 15326/19

  SARANCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 44850/18

  KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 23169/18

  VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 83654/17

  SAVELYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 984/15

  MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24326/18

  KUSHTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 16174/19 (anhängig)

  MESTETSKIY v. RUSSIA and 29 other applications
• EGMR - 20140/21 (anhängig)

  SMOLEV v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
• EGMR - 73383/17 (anhängig)

  MOCHALOV v. RUSSIA and17 other applications
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75231/17

  YURGILEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 11180/18 (anhängig)

  ZHILKIN v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
• EGMR - 25802/21 (anhängig)

  KALISTRATOVA v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 2829/18

  BOYARSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 14379/18 (anhängig)

  NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR - 24712/21 (anhängig)

  KUZMIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 67312/12

  FIRSTOV c. RUSSIE