Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege Nullum crimen sine lege) No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 65831/01

  Schutz der Infragestellung der von den Nazis am jüdischen Volk begangenen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  As regards Article 17 of the Convention, the first applicant submitted that that Article had been mainly applied to applications concerning anti-Semitic statements or lodged by anti-Semitic groups (he referred to Garaudy v. France (dec.), no. 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX; W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 42264/98, ECHR 2004-VII; and Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 35222/04, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96

  COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  When speaking of "law" Article 7 alludes to the very same concept as that to which the Convention refers elsewhere when using that term, a concept which comprises statute law as well as case-law and implies qualitative requirements, including those of accessibility and foreseeability (see Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 145, ECHR 2000-VII; and Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 107 and 108, 20 January 2009).
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 15615/07

  FERET c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  It had also been occasionally applied in cases concerning xenophobic statements (he cited Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23131/03, ECHR 2004-XI), whereas in other cases involving similar statements the Court had found that the application of Article 17 was not justified and that the case should be examined on the merits (he referred to Leroy v. France, no. 36109/03, 2 October 2008, and Féret v. Belgium, no. 15615/07, 16 July 2009).

 
• EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 23131/03

  NORWOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  It had also been occasionally applied in cases concerning xenophobic statements (he cited Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23131/03, ECHR 2004-XI), whereas in other cases involving similar statements the Court had found that the application of Article 17 was not justified and that the case should be examined on the merits (he referred to Leroy v. France, no. 36109/03, 2 October 2008, and Féret v. Belgium, no. 15615/07, 16 July 2009).
• EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 36109/03

  LEROY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  It had also been occasionally applied in cases concerning xenophobic statements (he cited Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23131/03, ECHR 2004-XI), whereas in other cases involving similar statements the Court had found that the application of Article 17 was not justified and that the case should be examined on the merits (he referred to Leroy v. France, no. 36109/03, 2 October 2008, and Féret v. Belgium, no. 15615/07, 16 July 2009).
• EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 35222/04

  PAVEL IVANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  As regards Article 17 of the Convention, the first applicant submitted that that Article had been mainly applied to applications concerning anti-Semitic statements or lodged by anti-Semitic groups (he referred to Garaudy v. France (dec.), no. 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX; W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 42264/98, ECHR 2004-VII; and Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 35222/04, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 59405/00

  ERBAKAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, ECHR 2003-II; Fazilet Partisi and Kutan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 1444/02, 30 June 2005; and Erbakan v. Turkey, no. 59405/00, 6 July 2006).
• EGMR, 02.09.2004 - 42264/98

  W.P. AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  As regards Article 17 of the Convention, the first applicant submitted that that Article had been mainly applied to applications concerning anti-Semitic statements or lodged by anti-Semitic groups (he referred to Garaudy v. France (dec.), no. 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX; W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 42264/98, ECHR 2004-VII; and Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 35222/04, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 54468/09

  HUHTAMAKI v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  A law may still satisfy the requirement of "foreseeability" where the person concerned has to take appropriate legal advice to assess, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, § 54, ECHR 2006-IV, and Huhtamäki v. Finland, no. 54468/09, § 44, 6 March 2012).
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 1444/02

  FAZILET PARTISI ET KUTAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 26261/05

  41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, ECHR 2003-II; Fazilet Partisi and Kutan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 1444/02, 30 June 2005; and Erbakan v. Turkey, no. 59405/00, 6 July 2006).

• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 27510/08

  Leugnung des Völkermords an Armeniern von Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt

  26261/05 and 26377/06, §§ 106-13, 14 March 2013).

  This approach remains current, as is shown by recent case-law (for example, Kasymakhurov and Saybatalov v. Russia, nos. 26261/05 and 26377/06, 14 March 2013).

• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35943/10

  VONA v. HUNGARY

  Pour ce qui est de l'article 10 de la Convention et de l'article 3 du Protocole n° 1, voir J. Glimmerveen et J. Hagenbeek c. Pays-Bas, nos 8348/78 et 8406/78, décision de la Commission du 11 octobre 1979, Décisions et Rapports (DR) 18, p. 198 ; Norwood c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), n° 23131/03, 16 novembre 2004, Witzsch c. Allemagne (déc.), n° 7485/03, 13 décembre 2005, et Lehideux et Isorni c. France, 23 septembre 1998, §§ 47 et 53, Recueil 1998-VII ; et, concernant l'article 11, W.P. et autres c. Pologne (déc.), 2 septembre 2004, n° 42264/98, Recueil 2004-VII, et Kasymakhunov et Saybatalov c. Russie, nos 26261/05 et 26377/06, § 113, 14 mars 2013.
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 77400/14

  AYOUB ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Parmi eux, figurent les libertés d'expression et d'association garanties par les articles 10 et 11 de la Convention qui sont couvertes par l'article 17 de la Convention (Lawless, précité, § 6, Kasymakhunov et Saybatalov c. Russie, nos 26261/05 et 26377/06, § 103, 14 mars 2013, Roj TV A/S, précité, § 30 et les références citées).

 
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 11214/19

  INTERNATIONALE HUMANITÄRE HILFSORGANISATION E. V. v. GERMANY

  26261/05 and 26377/06, § 106, 14 March 2013).
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 4493/11

  ATAMANCHUK v. RUSSIA

  26261/05 and 26377/06, § 107, 14 March 2013, which concerned direct calls for violence against Jews, the State of Israel, and the West in general).
• EGMR - 2841/10 (anhängig)

  BASYROV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  If the judgment of 7 May 2009 was not officially published in the period from May 2009 to June 2011, can the law on the basis of which Mr Bikeyev, Mr Bimukhanov, Mr Dubertalayev and Mr Krushenov were convicted be considered sufficiently accessible and foreseeable, as required by Article 7 of the Convention (see Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v. Russia, nos. 26261/05 and 26377/06, §§ 89-95, 14 March 2013)?.
• EGMR - 48413/09 (anhängig)

  ANDREY NIKITIN v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  26261/05 and 26377/06, §§ 102-14, 14 March 2013; Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23131/03, 16 November 2004, and W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 42264/98, 2 September 2004)?.