Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 21.09.2017

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,64052
EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,64052)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.10.2010 - 38717/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,64052)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Oktober 2010 - 38717/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,64052)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64052) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (41)Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 37083/03

    TEBIETI MÜHAFIZE CEMIYYETI AND ISRAFILOV c. AZERBAIDJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    As it transpires from the case file materials, Mr Lesovoy has been representing the applicant throughout the proceedings before the Court and is therefore entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, which, according to the present currency exchange rate, are equal to about EUR 1, 000. Accordingly, the Court considers those fees to have been "actually incurred" (see Tebieti Mühafize Cemiyyeti and Israfilov v. Azerbaijan, no. 37083/03, § 106, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    The Court notes that the period to be taken into consideration in the present case commenced on 28 April 2004 - the date of the applicant's arrest, and terminated on 29 December that same year - the date of his conviction by the first-instance court (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    The Court emphasises that Article 5 of the Convention guarantees the fundamental right to liberty and security, which is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 37, Series A no. 33).
  • EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    All persons are entitled to the protection of that right, that is to say, not to be deprived, or to continue to be deprived, of their liberty, save in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 5 § 1 (see Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 40, Series A no. 114).
  • EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

    Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

    ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    Shifting the burden of proof to the detained person in such matters is tantamount to overturning the rule of Article 5 of the Convention, a provision which makes detention an exceptional departure from the right to liberty and one that is only permissible in exhaustively enumerated and strictly defined cases (see Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, § 67, 7 April 2005, and Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 84-85, 26 July 2001).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01

    NESTAK v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    In order for deprivation of liberty to be considered free from such arbitrariness, it does not suffice that this measure is executed in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances (see Nesták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 74827/01

    PAVLIK v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    While relying on the gravity of the charges and the inherent risk that he would abscond, they failed to give any assessment to the applicant's undisputed compliance with the investigator's summonses for more than a month prior to his arrest, as well as the absence of any attempts from his side to influence the course of the investigation in any manner (see, conversely, Pavlík v. Slovakia, no. 74827/01, § 95, 30 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 11036/03

    LADENT AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    Thus, for the Court, detention pursuant to Article 5 § 1 (c) must embody a proportionality requirement (see Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, § 55, ECHR 2008-... (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 38797/03

    AMBRUSZKIEWICZ c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
    For example, in the case of Ambruszkiewicz v. Poland (no. 38797/03, §§ 29-32, 4 May 2006) the Court examined whether the applicant's placement in custody was strictly necessary to ensure his presence at the trial and whether other, less stringent, measures could have been sufficient for that purpose.
  • EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

    Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit Hooligans

    (iii) Necessity 77. In the context of the first limb of subparagraph (c) of paragraph 1 (reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence) of Article 5, the Court has held that "[i]n order for deprivation of liberty to be considered free from arbitrariness, it does not suffice that this measure is executed in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances" (see, among other authorities, Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, § 55, 18 March 2008; Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, § 27, 14 October 2010; Korneykova v. Ukraine, no. 39884/05, §§ 34 and 43, 19 January 2012; and Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, § 86, 6 October 2016).
  • EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04

    [ENG]

    The Court emphasises that in order for deprivation of liberty to be considered free from arbitrariness within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, it does not suffice that this measure is executed in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances (see Nesták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007; and Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 13.04.2023 - 71105/14

    TSEKHANOVYCH v. UKRAINE

    arbitrary arrest by the court (Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, §§ 55-56, 18 March 2008; Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, §§ 28-30, 14 October 2010).

    arbitrary arrest by the court (Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, §§ 55-56, 18 March 2008; Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, §§ 28-30, 14 October 2010).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,36337
EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. September 2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,36337) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KHARCHENKO CONTRE L'UKRAINE ET 35 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KHARCHENKO AGAINST UKRAINE AND 35 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
  • EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
  • EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Zitiert selbst (38)

  • EGMR, 26.02.2026 - 16595/23

    VITKOVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 04/02/2020-25/08/2023, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts, failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint, failure to examine the possibility, as the case progressed, of applying other measures to secure attendance at the trial (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016),.

    Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 21/05/2021 - pending, collective detention orders, fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the courts as the case progressed (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016),.

  • EGMR, 23.01.2025 - 25790/23

    IVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - from 02/12/2020 to 12/10/2023, based on standard grounds without analysis of the risks or alternative measures (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016).

    Art. 5 (3) - lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for pre-trial detention - 18/01/2018 - 20/10/2023, failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint, failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention, fragility of the reasons employed by the court (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016);.

  • EGMR, 27.11.2025 - 30989/24

    LEMESHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    insufficient reasons given for pre-trial detention (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15,.
  • EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 34181/23

    VOYTENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 01/10/2014 - 09/11/2023 - absence of proper examination of the alternative measures; lack of diligence on behalf of the authorities; poor reasoning of detention as the case progressed (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02,.
  • EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 44704/11

    POPOVYCH v. UKRAINE

    On the other hand, in the case of Molodorych v. Ukraine (no. 2161/02, §§ 104-106, 28 October 2010), the Court made the following findings concerning the substance of complaints under Article 5 § 4 with respect to the same legal framework as in the case at hand:.
  • EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 30579/10

    [ENG]

    The Court notes that the general principles applicable in the field of medical assistance to be provided to detainees were summarised in Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, §§ 58-59, 10 February 2011).
  • EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 22896/22

    CHUPRYNA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 19/11/2019 - 18/11/2021, failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to examine the possibility, as the case progressed, of applying other measures to secure attendance at the trial (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81,.
  • EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 63754/09

    PIKHUN v. UKRAINE

    The Court has already found that Ukrainian law, as it stood at the relevant time, did not provide a procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of continued detention after the completion of pre-trial investigations that satisfied the requirements of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, § 100, 10 February 2011).
  • EGMR, 02.04.2026 - 1129/25

    PYVOVARCHUK v. UKRAINE

    Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - lack of speediness of review of detention: the applicant's request for review of 25/06/2024 detention order, lodged on 27/06/2024, was examined on 16/09/2024 with a delay of 81 days (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 84-87,.
  • EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 6759/11

    GAL v. UKRAINE

    The Court has previously found court orders made during a trial which fix no time-limits for further detention to be one of the recurrent problems in the case-law against Ukraine (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, § 98, 10 February 2011).
  • EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 37789/05

    PLESHKOV v. UKRAINE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht