Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,47009
EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99 (https://dejure.org/2007,47009)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.12.2007 - 50003/99 (https://dejure.org/2007,47009)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Dezember 2007 - 50003/99 (https://dejure.org/2007,47009)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,47009) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (313)Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99
    In that connection, the Government cited a number of the Court's judgments (among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52; James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98; and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102), stressing that the legitimate objectives of "public interest", such as those pursued by the State in adopting measures of economic reform or measures designed to achieve greater social justice might in general call for less than reimbursement of the full market value.

    In particular, legitimate objectives in the "public interest", such as those pursued in measures of economic reform or measures designed to achieve greater social justice, may call for less than reimbursement of the full market value (see, among many other authorities, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, p. 36, § 54; Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 50, § 120; Scordino (no.1) v. Italy, [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-..., §§ 95 et seq., with further references; and Broniowski (merits), cited above, § 182).

  • EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99
    In that connection, the Government cited a number of the Court's judgments (among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52; James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98; and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102), stressing that the legitimate objectives of "public interest", such as those pursued by the State in adopting measures of economic reform or measures designed to achieve greater social justice might in general call for less than reimbursement of the full market value.
  • EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 72203/01
    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99
    In that connection, the Court would recall that the State has a wide margin of appreciation when passing laws in the context of a change of political and economic regime and that in such contexts there might even arise situations where the lack of any compensation would be found compatible with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC] nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, ECHR 2005-..., §§ 113-117, with further references; and, a contrario, Scordino (no.1), cited above, §§ 102-103).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 11208/02

    WITKOWSKA-TOBOLA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99
    Having regard to the decision to examine the case simultaneously with the case of Witkowska-Tobola v. Poland (no. 11208/02), pursuant to Rule 42 § 2 of the Rules of Court,.
  • RG, 28.01.1898 - 28/98

    1. Inwiefern kann der Thatbestand der intellektuellen Urkundenfälschung für …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99
    On 25 May 1998 the first applicant and W.S. obtained a certificate (no. 28/98) issued by the Warsaw District Office (Urzad Rejonowy) confirming that their family had abandoned real property in Brest-on-Bug, the value of which amounted to 808, 633 Polish zlotys (PLN) as of March 1998.
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    [ENG]

    The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007... (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

    VARGA v. HUNGARY and 78 other applications

    The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10

    RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, 4 December 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht