Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,2591
EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,2591)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.02.2017 - 52722/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,2591)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Februar 2017 - 52722/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,2591)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,2591) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    S.K. v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Syria);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Syria);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

  • zeit.de (Pressemeldung, 14.02.2017)

    Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

  • beck-aktuell.de (Kurzinformation)

    Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Zitiert selbst (28)

  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    Nevertheless, its powers and the procedural guarantees which it affords are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 67, Series A no. 28).
  • EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    When the "authority" concerned is not a judicial authority, the Court makes a point of verifying its independence (see, for example, Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, §§ 77 and 81-83, Series A no. 116, and Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, §§ 44-47, ECHR 2000-V) and the procedural guarantees it offers applicants (see, mutatis mutandis, Chahal, cited above, §§ 152-54).
  • EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

    Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    Having regard to the finding the applicant's removal would violate Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see paragraph 63 above), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, the complaints under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention are admissible and whether there have also been violations of those provisions (see, for the approach, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

    STANEV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
  • EGMR, 12.05.2000 - 35394/97

    Menschenrechte: Schutz der Privatsphäre, Faires Verfahren

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    When the "authority" concerned is not a judicial authority, the Court makes a point of verifying its independence (see, for example, Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, §§ 77 and 81-83, Series A no. 116, and Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, §§ 44-47, ECHR 2000-V) and the procedural guarantees it offers applicants (see, mutatis mutandis, Chahal, cited above, §§ 152-54).
  • EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 29094/09

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    Article 13 of the Convention does not compel Contracting States to set up a second level of appeal in this type of cases, it being sufficient that there is at least one domestic remedy which fully satisfies the requirements of this Article, namely that it provides for independent and rigorous scrutiny for a complaint relating to Article 3 of the Convention and has automatic suspensive effect in respect of the impugned measure (see A.M. v. the Netherlands, no. 29094/09, §§ 62 and 70, 5 July 2016).
  • EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 41872/10

    M.A. c. CHYPRE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    Therefore, the Court has previously rejected arguments referring to administrative or other "practice" as sufficient grounds for a suspensive effect (see Čonka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, §§ 81-83, ECHR 2002-I; Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien], cited above, § 66; and M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 137, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02

    DRIZA c. ALBANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    In that connection, it considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

    KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
    Any claim that there exist substantial grounds for fearing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 also requires independent and rigorous scrutiny (see Jabari, cited above, § 50), and reasonable promptness (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV; and De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, § 81, ECHR 2012).
  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

    AZIMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

    KIM v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 11209/10

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

    AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 50552/13

    RAKHIMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 39428/12

    GABLISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 3427/13

    HADZIMEJLIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  • EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 68894/13

    KHAMRAKULOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 11916/15
  • EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 8474/14

    NABID ABDULLAYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 39417/07

    ALIM v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 15590/14

    TURGUNOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 10226/13

    TERSHIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

    CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
  • EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

    Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07

    Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …

  • EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

    Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  • EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 34016/18

    O.D. ./. Bulgarien - Abschiebung nach Syrien würde gegen Folterverbot verstoßen

    Les documents pertinents du Haut-Commissariat des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés (HCNUR) relatifs à la protection des réfugiés sont mentionnés et résumés dans l'arrêt S.K. c. Russie (no 52722/15, §§ 42-44, 14 février 2017).

    Dans l'arrêt plus récent S.K. c. Russie (no 52722/15, 14 février 2017), la Cour a observé, sur la base des documents pertinents relatifs à la situation en Syrie et postérieurs à l'arrêt L.M. et autres c. Russie, précité, que la sécurité et la situation humanitaire, ainsi que la nature et la portée des hostilités en Syrie s'étaient dramatiquement détériorées entre 2011 et début 2016.

  • VG Köln, 09.04.2018 - 20 K 7230/17
    Rn. 89 vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 14.02.2017 - Nr. 52722/15 - S.K vs. Russland -,.
  • EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

    M.D. v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

    The relevant domestic law and practice relating to the expulsion and detention of foreign nationals in Russia, refugee status and temporary asylum is summarised in the Court's judgment concerning expulsion of Syrian nationals from Russia in the case of L.M. and Others v. Russia (nos. 40081/14 and two others, §§ 61-75, 15 October 2015) and in the follow-up case of S.K. v. Russia, no. 52722/15, §§ 23-41, 14 February 2017.

    Accordingly, in the light of these considerations, and given the Court's recurrent findings of violations of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention in respect of foreigners detained virtually indefinitely in Russia with a view to administrative expulsion, the Court finds that the length of the detention of M.D. and M.O. exceeded what was reasonably required for the purpose pursued (see the above-cited cases of L.M. and Others v. Russia, §§ 141-42 and 149-52, with further references, and S.K. v. Russia, no. 52722/15, §§ 108-09 and § 116, 14 February 2017; see also M.S.A. and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 29957/14 and 9 others, 12 December 2017, in which the Court found that the detention of Syrian nationals pending expulsion was in violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht