Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article ...
Wird zitiert von ... (88) Zitiert selbst (30)
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
The quality of the evidence is also taken into account, including whether the circumstances in which it was obtained cast doubt on its reliability or accuracy (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-IX). - EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 36391/02
Wirksamkeitsverpflichtete Konventionsauslegung; Recht auf konkreten und wirksamen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Even where compelling reasons may exceptionally justify denial of access to a lawyer, such restriction - whatever its justification - must not unduly prejudice the rights of the accused under Article 6 (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 55, ECHR 2008). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or of law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45-46, Series A no. 140, and Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, 9 June 1998, § 34, Reports 1998-IV).
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
That right is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 37, Series A no. 33). - EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
However, if a failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation is manifest or is sufficiently brought to the authorities' attention in some other way, the authorities must take steps to ensure that the accused effectively enjoys the right to legal assistance (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33-37, Series A no. 37, and Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 65, Series A no. 168). - EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04
KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
However, if a failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation is manifest or is sufficiently brought to the authorities' attention in some other way, the authorities must take steps to ensure that the accused effectively enjoys the right to legal assistance (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33-37, Series A no. 37, and Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 65, Series A no. 168). - EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96
Dieter Krombach
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
The Court reiterates that, although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 7377/03
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Nevertheless, the Court reiterates that the very fact of restricting a detained suspect's access to a lawyer may prejudice the rights of the defence, even where an accused person remained silent, or was not questioned, or no incriminating statements were obtained (see, for example, Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, §§ 32-33, 13 October 2009). - EGMR, 09.04.1984 - 8966/80
- EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 20372/11
VYERENTSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 42086/05
LIU v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88
POITRIMOL c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04
BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92
DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04
SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86
- EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 36673/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 61821/00
ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 6991/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 3653/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 26163/22
AHMADLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015, Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87,.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 23689/14
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015, Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 3346/17
BALAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 27390/17
ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 14.11.2024 - 58689/17
VALIYEV AND GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions and lack of own choice of legal assistance (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-94, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions and lack of own choice of legal assistance (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-94, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09
LASHMANKIN v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications
As a preliminary remark, the Court notes that it has already criticised the very similar legal framework existing in Azerbaijan as lacking foreseeability and precision and, as a result, allowing public assemblies to be arbitrarily banned or dispersed (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, § 55, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 5865/07
BUTKEVICH v. RUSSIA
It is unclear whether in the appeal proceedings the applicant changed his plea to guilty and merely sought a reduction of the sentence (compare Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, § 86, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11
MAHAMMAD MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
For a summary of other relevant provisions concerning administrative proceedings, the relevant provisions concerning the organisation and holding of public assemblies, and the relevant extracts of international documents, see the judgment in the case of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 27-42, 15 October 2015).The Court notes that the issues raised in the present applications are essentially the same as those examined in the case of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015).
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 9626/14
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
For a summary of other relevant provisions of the CAO see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 33-38, 15 October 2015).The principles relevant to the present complaint are summarised in Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 74-75, 83-84, 88-89, 91 and 93, 15 October 2015), and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] (nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, §§ 257-65, 13 September 2016).
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA
The courts justified his arrest and conviction by the mere reference to the "unlawfulness" of the march, without assessing whether it had been possible to ensure that the march proceed peacefully while minimising the disruption of movement of passers-by, road users and public service workers (see, mutatis mutandis, Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, § 60, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 15.07.2021 - 69686/12
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 34528/13
MAHADDINOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 67374/11
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
- EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 39466/16
IBRAHIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 30608/14
SAVALANLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 39472/16
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66917/11
AGAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39919/07
ELCHIN HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 2515/11
JAFARZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 48431/11
MOVSUM SAMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 25.09.2025 - 13537/24
ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 76236/11
ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 71846/13
KARIMLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 23086/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 02.07.2026 - 13490/25
- EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 64733/09
ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 69483/13
MUSTAFA HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 28232/22
FIGURKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 23814/15
MUCHNIK AND MORDOVIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 20589/13
MEHTIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 9 other applications
- EGMR - 21744/20 (anhängig)
SADIGOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
- EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 17184/18
A v. AZERBAIJAN and 24 other applications
- EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 47915/09
DADASHOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 12 other applications
- EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 59202/12
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
BAYRAM BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 10 other applications
- EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 5231/13
HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 23.03.2023 - 1476/18
SAFAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 80814/17
SHALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 52286/11
AHMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 44529/09
CHUMAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 12854/13
MIRZAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 69397/11
ABBAS v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
- EGMR, 29.06.2017 - 44699/13
HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 19150/13
BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 54198/22
SALAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17
RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.04.2025 - 19201/13
DADASHOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 11.07.2024 - 20591/20
AHMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 14962/15
ISAGOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 6307/18
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.05.2023 - 13382/18
GARAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 7218/13
MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
- EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 71750/13
BABAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 24219/16
KARIMOV c. AZERBAÏDJAN et 2 autres affaires
- EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 38158/12
DAMIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 39527/23 (anhängig)
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR, 04.09.2025 - 6261/24
GULIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.05.2025 - 59925/18
ASLANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 27.03.2025 - 23702/20
BAYRAMOV AND ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 13.03.2025 - 35363/18
BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 57679/18
ABDULLAZADE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.10.2024 - 53961/19
YAGUBLU AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 42513/19
GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 59863/18
ISMAYILOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57347/19
ABDULLAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 38567/19
NADIRLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 9664/20
SAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 8640/20
MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 38931/20
HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 57739/18
GASIMLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 31.08.2023 - 19071/18
BABAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 31.08.2023 - 40990/18
ASHUROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.05.2023 - 9362/17
NABIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 1308/12
SHIRINLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 43137/13
BABAK HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 72230/11
BAYRAMLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 42989/13
JAMIL HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 5417/13
ABBASLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 69456/11
AHAD MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR - 64427/17 (anhängig)
AGAKISHIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 23035/19 (anhängig)
ABBASALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.01.2026 - 37567/23
MEKVABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 13509/12
MUKHTARLI v. AZERBAIJAN ano 1 other application
- EGMR, 28.09.2017 - 69180/11
HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 24508/11
MAHAMMAD MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 34262/14
HUSEYNOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 60262/11
BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 6 other applications
- EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 65910/14
KHALILOVA AND AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10, 24508/11, 60259/11, 63959/11, 67351/11, 67977/11, 69234/11, 69252/11, 69335/11, 69411/11, 69421/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAYRAM BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
It is therefore unnecessary to take the complaints under Article 10 into consideration separately (see Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, § 35, Series A no. 202; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 82-83, 3 October 2013; and Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 85, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
For a summary of other relevant provisions concerning administrative proceedings, the relevant provisions concerning the organisation and holding of public assemblies, and the relevant extracts of international documents, see the judgment in the case of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 27-42, 15 October 2015). - KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08
Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
26/08/2011.
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 69889/01
GROSHEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
The Court reiterates that where an applicant is entitled to be served automatically with a copy of the final domestic decision, the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the copy of the written decision, irrespective of whether that decision was previously delivered orally (see Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V; Venkadajalasarma v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 58510/11, 9 July 2002; Groshev v. Russia, no. 69889/01, § 22, 20 October 2005; and Vasilyev v. Ukraine, no. 11370/02, §§ 48-49, 21 June 2007). - EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 35093/05
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
The Court does not find it unreasonable that the applicants waited several months for the official service of the final decisions before lodging complaints (enquiries) about the court's failure to serve them with a copy of those decisions (contrast with Dragun v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 35093/05, 8 October 2013). - EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 11370/02
VASILYEV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
The Court reiterates that where an applicant is entitled to be served automatically with a copy of the final domestic decision, the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the copy of the written decision, irrespective of whether that decision was previously delivered orally (see Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V; Venkadajalasarma v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 58510/11, 9 July 2002; Groshev v. Russia, no. 69889/01, § 22, 20 October 2005; and Vasilyev v. Ukraine, no. 11370/02, §§ 48-49, 21 June 2007). - EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 29503/03
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
It has also ruled that an applicant must show a certain degree of diligence and obtain a copy of the decision deposited with the court registry (see, for example, Çolakoğlu v. Turkey, no. 29503/03, § 28, 20 October 2009). - EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 6491/06
URUCI v. ALBANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 74609/10
The Court further reiterates that it is incumbent on an interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests and to take the necessary steps to apprise himself of developments in the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Uruci v. Albania (dec.), no. 6491/06, 24 January 2012).
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 9626/14
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
74609/10 and 5 others, 16 February 2017.74609/10 and 5 others, §§ 63-64, 16 February 2017; Ahad Mammadli v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos.
- EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11
MAHAMMAD MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
Firstly, the Court reiterates that it has already found that the dispersal of the demonstration of 2 April 2011 was not justified under Article 11 of the Convention having regard, in particular, to the fact that the authorities had been notified of the demonstration and it had been intended to be peaceful and had been conducted in a peaceful manner until the moment of its dispersal by the police (see Ahad Mammadli, cited above, § 35, and Bayram Bayramov and Others v. Azerbaijan ([Committee] nos. 74609/10 and 5 others, § 52, 16 February 2017).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".