Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 27. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 27. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr
Unverbindlich anmelden
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 13.06.2006

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 7510/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,37236
EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,37236)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31.05.2007 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,37236)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31. Mai 2007 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2007,37236)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,37236) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KONTROVA c. SLOVAQUIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13+2, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 2 Violation de l'art. 13+2 Non-lieu à examiner les art. 8 13+8 et 6 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédures nationale et ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KONTROVA v. SLOVAKIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13+2, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 13+2 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 13+8 and 6 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings ...

  • Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte PDF

    (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (22)

  • EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 62903/15

    Amtshaftungsklage gegen Österreich: Behörden reagierten ausreichend auf häusliche …

    Second, in appropriate circumstances there is a positive obligation on the authorities to take preventive operational measures to protect an individual whose life is at risk from the criminal acts of another individual (see Osman, cited above, § 115, cited in Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, § 49, 31 May 2007; Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 108).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

    It also extends in appropriate circumstances to a positive obligation on the authorities to take preventive operational measures to protect an individual whose life is at risk from the criminal acts of another individual (see Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, § 115, Reports 1998-VIII, cited in Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, § 49, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 41237/14

    Italien muss Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt entschädigen

    Elle estime que cela peut aussi vouloir dire, dans certaines circonstances, mettre à la charge des autorités l'obligation positive de prendre préventivement des mesures d'ordre pratique pour protéger l'individu dont la vie est menacée par les agissements criminels d'autrui (Osman c. Royaume-Uni, 28 octobre 1998, § 115, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-VIII, cité dans Kontrová c. Slovaquie, no 7510/04, § 49, 31 mai 2007).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 33056/17

    TKHELIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Secondly, in appropriate circumstances there is a duty on the authorities to take preventive operational measures to protect an individual whose life is at risk from the criminal acts of another individual (see Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, § 49, 31 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01

    BAZJAKS v. LATVIA

    Further, the Court has held that the compensation for non-pecuniary damage should as a matter of principle be available as part of the range of possible remedies for a breach of Articles 2 and 3, which rank as the most fundamental provisions of the Convention (see, as concerns a violation of Article 3 on account of lack of adequate medical care of a prisoner, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 130, ECHR 2001-III; and, as concerns a violation of Article 2 on account of State's failure to intervene to safeguard the lives of the applicant's children Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, § 64, ECHR 2007-VI (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 22999/06

    [ENG]

    Par ailleurs, les faits de l'espèce différeraient de ceux des affaires Keenan c. Royaume-Uni (no 27229/95, § 130, CEDH 2001-III) et Kontrová c. Slovaquie (no 7510/04, § 64, 31 mai 2007), la présente affaire ne soulevant aucune question sous l'angle de l'article 3 de la Convention.
  • EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 58447/00

    ZAVOLOKA c. LETTONIE

    Dans ces circonstances, la Cour estime qu'il y a lieu d'examiner ce grief uniquement sous l'angle de l'article 13 combiné avec l'article 2 de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, Dölek, précité, § 93, et Kontrová c. Slovaquie, no 7510/04, § 59, CEDH 2007-...).
  • EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 35767/23

    J.S. v. SLOVAKIA

    She submitted that the cases of violence against women were underreported and the number of prosecutions and convictions of perpetrators was low, as indicated in reports on Slovakia (which she did not specify) by the CEDAW Committee and the CAT and as illustrated by several past cases of violence against women which had not been sufficiently investigated (here she referred to Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, 31 May 2007, and E.S. and Others v. Slovakia, no. 8227/04, 15 September 2009).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7678/09

    [ENG]

    It was similar to Akkoç v. Turkey (nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 80, ECHR 2000-X) and to Kontrová v. Slovakia (no. 7510/04, § 52, 31 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44166/15

    PENATI c. ITALIE

    Cela peut aussi vouloir dire, dans certaines circonstances, mettre à la charge des autorités l'obligation positive de prendre préventivement des mesures d'ordre pratique pour protéger l'individu dont la vie est menacée par les agissements criminels d'autrui (Osman c. Royaume-Uni, 28 octobre 1998, § 115, Recueil 1998-VIII, cité dans l'arrêt Kontrová c. Slovaquie, no 7510/04, § 49, 31 mai 2007).
  • EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 4479/03

    MIKOLAJOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  • EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 74556/11

    FUXOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 22416/07

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42390/07

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 28556/11

    KUM c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 28326/09

    P.F. AND E.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 10601/09

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 43982/06

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 05.12.2024 - 904/18

    A.K. v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 73521/12

    R.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 54788/11

    ALTUN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 61974/11

    VOSYLIUS AND VOSYLIENE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,43935
EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,43935)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.06.2006 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,43935)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Juni 2006 - 7510/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,43935)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,43935) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    In making this conclusion, the Court has also taken into consideration the applicant's personal circumstances, the fact that a right as fundamental as the right to life is at stake (see, among other authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-6, § 147) and that the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are not theoretical or illusory, but rights that are practical and effective (see, for example, Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    The Court considers, in the light of the parties" submissions, that the complaint raises serious issues of fact and law under the Convention, including the question of the applicability ratione materiae of the procedural protection of Article 6 § 1 to the applicant's claim for compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage (see Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 116-121, ECHR 2005-...), the determination of which should depend on an examination of the merits of the relevant part of the application.
  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 48666/99

    KUCERA v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    It is clear that these changes have given rise to a need to regulate by law new types of relationships, in particular in the area of non-pecuniary damage to natural persons (see, for example, the cases of Kucera v. Slovakia (dec), no. 48666/99, 4 November 2003, Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, 22 June 2004 and Tám v. Slovakia, no.50213/99, 22 June 2004, E.O. and V.P. v. Slovakia, nos.
  • EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 39359/98

    PAVLETIC v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    It is clear that these changes have given rise to a need to regulate by law new types of relationships, in particular in the area of non-pecuniary damage to natural persons (see, for example, the cases of Kucera v. Slovakia (dec), no. 48666/99, 4 November 2003, Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, 22 June 2004 and Tám v. Slovakia, no.50213/99, 22 June 2004, E.O. and V.P. v. Slovakia, nos.
  • EGMR, 17.05.2005 - 50232/99

    Z.M. AND K.P. v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    56193/00 and 57581/00, 27 April 2004 and Z.M. and K.P. v. Slovakia, no. 50232/99, 17 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99

    TAM v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    It is clear that these changes have given rise to a need to regulate by law new types of relationships, in particular in the area of non-pecuniary damage to natural persons (see, for example, the cases of Kucera v. Slovakia (dec), no. 48666/99, 4 November 2003, Pavletic v. Slovakia, no. 39359/98, 22 June 2004 and Tám v. Slovakia, no.50213/99, 22 June 2004, E.O. and V.P. v. Slovakia, nos.
  • EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 56193/00

    E.O. and V.P. v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    56193/00 and 57581/00, 27 April 2004 and Z.M. and K.P. v. Slovakia, no. 50232/99, 17 May 2005).
  • EuGH, 04.05.1999 - C-108/97

    Windsurfing Chiemsee - Richtlinie 89/104/EWG - Marken - Geographische …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    In proceedings no. 4C 109/97 in the Sala District Court the plaintiff claimed compensation from the Ministry of Justice for non-pecuniary damage on the ground that he had been acquitted following the reopening of proceedings in which he had initially been convicted.
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    This means, amongst other things, that the Court must take realistic account not only of the existence of formal remedies in the legal system of the Contracting Party concerned but also of the general legal and political context in which they operate as well as the personal circumstances of the applicants (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, §§ 58-59, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41220/98

    ALIEV v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 7510/04
    It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time (see Aliev v. Ukraine, no. 41220/98, § 105, 29 April 2003).
  • RG, 02.03.1899 - 109/99

    1. Hat der Angehörige (§ 51 St.P.O.) eines Verurteilten in dem erst nach dieser …

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht