Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Six month period);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Petition);Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• sputniknews.com (Pressemeldung, 17.01.2017)

  Verbot von Adoption russischer Kinder für US-Bürger verurteilt

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (26)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  At the same time, the Court has held the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention to be a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) or the right to self-determination as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  The right to respect for "family life" does not safeguard the mere desire to found a family; it presupposes the existence of a family (see Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 31), or at the very least the potential relationship between a child born out of wedlock and his or her natural father, for example, (see Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI), or the relationship that arises from a genuine marriage, even if family life has not yet been fully established (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali, cited above, § 62), or the relationship that arises from a lawful and genuine adoption (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 148, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  At the same time, the Court has held the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention to be a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) or the right to self-determination as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).

• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  Furthermore, the protection under Article 8 also extended to cover intended family life (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no. 94).
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  It encompasses elements such as gender identification, sexual orientation and sexual life, which fall within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, for example, Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, pp. 18-19, § 41), and the right to respect for both the decisions to have and not to have a child (see Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 71, ECHR 2007-I), including the right of a couple to conceive a child and to make use of medically assisted reproduction for that purpose (see S.H. and Others v. Austria ([GC], no. 57813/00, § 82, ECHR 2011.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available both in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that it was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  The Court held that the protection from discrimination enshrined in Article 14 extended to such additional rights, in particular in the context of adoption (see E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, §§ 47-51, 22 January 2008).
• EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 13580/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  It is necessary - but also sufficient - for the facts of the case to fall "within the ambit" of one or more of the Articles of the Convention (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali, cited above, § 71; Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B, § 22; Petrovic v. Austria, judgment of 27 March 1998, Reports 1998-II, § 22; and Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 88, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 44599/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  At the same time, the Court has held the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention to be a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) or the right to self-determination as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  However, very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before the Court could regard a difference in treatment based exclusively on the ground of nationality as compatible with the Convention (see Gaygusuz, cited above, § 42, Reports 1996-IV; Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892/98, § 46, ECHR 2003-X; Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 87, ECHR 2009; Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05, § 52, ECHR 2011; and Biao, cited above, § 93).
• EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 40892/98
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 25762/07

  Schwizgebel ./. Schweiz: Diskriminierung eines Adoptionsbewerbers wegen des …
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78028/01

  PINI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.06.1999 - 27110/95

  NYLUND contre la FINLANDE
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 56547/00

  P., C. ET S. c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 37645/97

  SAWICKA v. POLAND
• EKMR, 18.05.1976 - 6825/74

  X. v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78030/01
• EKMR, 15.12.1977 - 7229/75

  X. et Y. c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EKMR, 10.07.1997 - 31924/96

  DI LAZZARO contre l'ITALIE
• EKMR, 01.10.1990 - 15817/89

  WAKEFIELD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 20.05.1996 - 23715/94

  S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 38972/06

  GIUSTO, BORNACIN AND V. v. ITALY
• EKMR, 10.07.1975 - 6482/74

  X. c. BELGIQUE et PAYS-BAS

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 73548/17

  X AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  In response to the Government's argument that the applicants could have sought damages before domestic courts, the Court reiterates that the domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred (see A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos. 6033/13 and 15 others, § 347, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 27.05.2021 - 54978/17

  MARCHI c. ITALIE

  Est en cause dès lors le droit au respect de la décision de la requérante de devenir parent, ainsi que le développement personnel de l'intéressée à travers le rôle de parent qu'elle souhaitait assumer vis-à-vis de l'enfant (Paradiso et Campanelli, précité, § 163, A.H. et autres c. Russie, nos 6033/13 et 15 autres, § 383, 17 janvier 2017).
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 44870/19

  AGARWAL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The applicant further considered that the Government had failed to put forward very weighty reasons, within the meaning of the Court's case-law (he cited Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, and A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos. 6033/13 and 15 others, § 407, 17 January 2017), that the difference of treatment complained of had been reasonably justified.

• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 37121/15

  BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  At the same time, in the case of A.H. and Others v. Russia (no. 6033/13, 17 January 2017), the Court examined the complaint (concerning different treatment of US adoptive parents and those from other countries) under Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8, ignoring the absolute margin of appreciation in the sphere of international adoption.
• EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 6878/14

  LAZORIVA v. UKRAINE AND RUSSIA

  6033/13 and 15 others, § 383, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  MYSLIHAKA v. ALBANIA

  Rn. 37 In response to the Government's argument that the applicants could have instituted judicial proceedings in the domestic courts, the Court reiterates that domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos. 6033/13 and 15 others, § 347, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 49516/17

  AVDIU AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  In the case X and Others v. Albania (nos. 73548/17 and 45521/19, § 63, 31 May 2022), the Court has emphasised that the domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred (see A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos. 6033/13 and 15 others, § 347, 17 January 2017).