Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations;Article 4-1 - Trafficking in human ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  W v. BULGARIA

  Art. 4, Art. 4 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (40)

• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 63664/19

  M. A. ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  This question has been raised in M.A. and Others v. France (nos. 63664/19 and 4 others), in which people selling sexual services complain that the criminalisation of the buying of such services in France infringes their rights under Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention.

  63664/19 and 4 others, 27 June 2023).

• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98

  Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The second canon is that the Convention and its Protocols should as far as possible be construed in harmony with the other rules of international law, of which they form a part (see, among other authorities, Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI; Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ?žirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 150, ECHR 2005-VI; and Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 77 and 102, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The first of these canons is that the object and purpose of the Convention, as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings, require that its provisions and those of its Protocols be interpreted in a way that renders the rights that they guarantee practical and effective (see, among other authorities, Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 87, Series A no. 161; and Demir and Baykara, cited above, § 66).

 
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The third canon is that when construing the Convention or its Protocols the Court may have regard to developments in domestic legal systems that indicate a uniform or common approach or a developing consensus between the Contracting States in a given area (see, among other authorities, Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 41, Series A no. 31; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 104, ECHR 1999-VI; and Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 138, 8 November 2016).
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The third canon is that when construing the Convention or its Protocols the Court may have regard to developments in domestic legal systems that indicate a uniform or common approach or a developing consensus between the Contracting States in a given area (see, among other authorities, Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 41, Series A no. 31; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 104, ECHR 1999-VI; and Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 138, 8 November 2016).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  Firstly, it is not for the Court to rule on any points regarding individual criminal liability (see Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111 in fine, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 168 in fine, ECHR 2003-XII; and Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, § 94, 20 February 2020).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  This obligation enhances the protection of the rights already enshrined in that Article in the light of present-day realities (see, mutatis mutandis, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18), and brings this protection into line with the increasingly high standard required in this domain (see, mutatis mutandis, Siliadin, cited above, §§ 121 and 148) and with the changed social context in which that Article now needs to be applied (see, mutatis mutandis, H.F. and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24384/19 and 44234/20, § 210, 14 September 2022).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  As for the question of whether the dismissal of the applicant's claim against X in respect of lost earnings engaged Article 4 of the Convention, it turns on the construction to be put on that provision (see Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 211, ECHR 2010 (extracts), and S.M. v. Croatia, cited above, § 238; see also, mutatis mutandis, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 38, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 44, ECHR 2004-VIII; Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503/97, § 58, ECHR 2008; Tanase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7/08, § 132, ECHR 2010; and Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 29750/09

  HASSAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The second canon is that the Convention and its Protocols should as far as possible be construed in harmony with the other rules of international law, of which they form a part (see, among other authorities, Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI; Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim ?žirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 150, ECHR 2005-VI; and Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 77 and 102, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  The first of these canons is that the object and purpose of the Convention, as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings, require that its provisions and those of its Protocols be interpreted in a way that renders the rights that they guarantee practical and effective (see, among other authorities, Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 87, Series A no. 161; and Demir and Baykara, cited above, § 66).
• EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81

  REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 14.09.2022 - 24384/19

  Europas IS-Anhänger: Großeltern klagen auf Rückholung
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 28.08.1986 - 9228/80

  GLASENAPP c. ALLEMAGNE
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 58216/12

  Ausreichende Untersuchung von Anschuldigungen von Menschenhandel
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

  SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 21.04.2016 - 46577/15

  IVANOVA AND CHERKEZOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99
• EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95

  TANLI v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 36919/02

  ARMONIENE v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 50705/11

  TODOROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 29335/13

  BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 9077/18

  Y AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12567/13

  BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 29620/07

  FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 58240/08

  SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 23373/03

  BIRIUK v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  Y v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 32538/10

  AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 27524/09

  MOVSESYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 37194/02

  V.T. c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 56352/14

  STANEVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 11157/11

  YORDANOVI c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 21.07.2020 - 31434/15

  VANYO TODOROV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 77587/12

  V.C.L. AND A.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 20116/12

  ZOLETIC AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN