Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,972
EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,972)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.02.2015 - 46404/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,972)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Februar 2015 - 46404/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,972)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,972) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KHLOYEV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 34 MRK
    Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (33)Zitiert selbst (53)

  • EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06

    ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13
    It is for the respondent Government to demonstrate to the Court that the interim measure was complied with or, in an exceptional case, that there was an objective impediment which prevented compliance and that the Government took all reasonable steps to remove the impediment and to keep the Court informed about the situation (see Paladi, cited above, §§ 92-106; and Aleksanyan v Russia, no. 46468/06, §§ 228-232, 22 December 2008, in which the Court concluded that the Russian Government had failed to honour their commitments under Article 34 of the Convention as a result of their failure to promptly transfer a seriously ill applicant to a specialised hospital and to subject him to an examination by a mixed medical commission including doctors of his choice, in disregard of an interim measure imposed by the Court under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court).

    Having referred to the general principles laid down by the Court in a number of judgments concerning the standards of medical care of detainees (among which Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, 22 December 2008; Mirilashvili v. Russia, no. 6293/04, 11 December 2008; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI, and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, ECHR 2002-IX), the Government stressed that the applicant had received comprehensive medical care in detention.

    That standard should be "compatible with the human dignity" of a detainee, but should also take into account "the practical demands of imprisonment" (see Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 140, 22 December 2008).

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

    Where such grounds are found to have been "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV and Suslov v. Russia, no. 2366/07, §§ 93-97, 29 May 2012).

  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

    KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13
    The Court reiterates in this regard that even though Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).

    Having regard to the above, the Court considers that the present case is different from many previous Russian cases where a violation of Article 5 § 3 was found because the domestic courts in those cases had extended the applicant's detention by relying essentially on the gravity of the charges, without addressing specific facts or considering alternative preventive measures (see, among many others, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 99 et seq., 1 March 2007; Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, §§ 103 et seq., ECHR 2006-... (extracts); and Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, §§ 72 et seq., 1 June 2006).

  • EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13

    KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    By way of comparison, the Court has previously given weight to the Russian authorities" reliance on the gravity of certain offences, such as kidnapping compounded with extortion (see Artemov v. Russia, no. 14945/03, § 75, 3 April 2014), or multiple aggravated gang kidnapping associated with extortion, robbery and possession and trafficking of firearms (see Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 7 and 98, 5 February 2015), or aggravated fraud by an organised group (see Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, §§ 6 and 40, 18 December 2012), or an organised aggravated murder (see Amirov v. Russia, no. 51857/13, §§ 10 and 104, 27 November 2014), or an organised aggravated assault causing injuries of four and one death (see Arutyunyan v. Russia, no. 48977/09, § 103, 10 January 2012).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 54436/14

    KLIMOV v. RUSSIA

    In so doing, the State has frustrated the purpose of the interim measure, which sought to enable the Court, on the basis of relevant, independent medical opinion, to effectively respond to and, if need be, prevent the possible continued exposure of the applicant to physical and mental suffering in violation of the guarantees of Article 3 of the Convention (see Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, § 67, 5 February 2015, and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 222, 14 March 2013.
  • EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 55025/17

    AKHPOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In particular, having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that the Government has failed to comply with the interim measure indicated by the Court under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court in application no. 51076/18, in breach of its obligations under Article 34 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 63-68, 5 February 2015, and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, §§ 216-24, 14 March 2013).
  • EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 38777/04

    [ENG]

    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Khayletdinov v. Russia, no. 2763/13, §§ 71-78, 12 January 2016; Ivko v. Russia, no. 30575/08, §§ 104-12, 15 December 2015; Litvinov v. Russia, no. 32863/13, §§ 90-96, 22 March 2016; Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 80-88, 5 February 2015; and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 68-76, 9 January 2014).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 12646/15

    MAYLENSKIY v. RUSSIA

    In so doing, the State has frustrated the purpose of the interim measure, which sought to enable the Court, on the basis of relevant, independent medical opinion, to effectively respond to and, if need be, prevent the possible continued exposure of the applicant to physical and mental suffering (see Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, § 67, 5 February 2015, and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 222, 14 March 2013).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 59620/14

    YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Interim measures thus enable the State concerned to discharge its obligation to comply with the final judgment of the Court, which is legally binding by virtue of Article 46 of the Convention (see Mamatkulov and Askarov, cited above, § 125; Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, § 60, 5 February 2015; and Patranin v. Russia, no. 12983/14, § 46, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 46298/19

    SUSLOV v. UKRAINE

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court further concludes that the applicant's complaints under Articles 6, 13 and 34 of the Convention disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Karnaushenko v. Ukraine, no. 23853/02, 30 November 2006 (concerning the complaint about the excessive length of the civil proceedings and lack of the domestic remedies in that regard) and in, among many other authorities related to the complaint about the failure to comply with an interim measure under Rule 39, Konovalchuk, cited above, §§ 75-81; Klimov v. Russia, no. 54436/14, §§ 41-50, 4 October 2016; Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 59-68, 5 February 2015; and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, §§ 216-24, 14 March 2013.
  • EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17

    SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court also finds that the domestic authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for example, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, 22 October 2009).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

    KONDRULIN v. RUSSIA

    In so doing, the State has frustrated the purpose of the interim measure, which was to enable the Court, on the basis of relevant, independent medical opinion, to effectively respond to and, if need be, prevent the possible continued exposure of the applicant to physical and mental suffering in violation of the guarantees of Article 3 of the Convention (see Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, § 67, 5 February 2015, and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 222, 14 March 2013).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 66252/14

    ANDREY LAVROV v. RUSSIA

    In so doing, the State has frustrated the purpose of the interim measure, which sought to enable the Court, on the basis of relevant, independent medical opinion, to effectively respond to and, if need be, prevent the possible continued exposure of the applicant to physical and mental suffering in violation of the guarantees of Article 3 of the Convention (see Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, § 67, 5 February 2015, and Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 222, 14 March 2013.
  • EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 48599/17

    DIGAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 44885/06

    RYAZANOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 01.07.2021 - 44253/08

    TETERIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 77755/16

    LUZHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1484/16

    IZYUROV AND KUKHARCHUK v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 49507/10

    DUDNICHENKO AND WAES v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 2091/11

    ELKSNIT AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 33595/18

    PARSHIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 44360/17

    KHUDYAKOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

  • EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 24504/18

    ZUYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 75390/16

    LATYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 36740/19

    ROKHLIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 9896/11

    BULDASHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.05.2018 - 26277/09

    KAZAKOVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.12.2017 - 70371/13

    KOROTEYEV AND SITARSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 46427/16

    SADRIYEV AND DEMIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 57410/16

    PAVLOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 16070/12

    CHERTENKOVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 48159/17

    KIREYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.09.2018 - 11584/17

    KOZHUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 60316/08

    KOCHNEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 72692/16

    ZARIPOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 11493/19

    KOLESNIKOV AND GUZIYEV v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht