Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten morgen, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2024,2807
EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21 (https://dejure.org/2024,2807)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.01.2024 - 53050/21 (https://dejure.org/2024,2807)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. Januar 2024 - 53050/21 (https://dejure.org/2024,2807)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,2807) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Zitiert selbst (57)

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
    42525/07 and 60800/08, § 98, 10 January 2012, and Ulemek v. Croatia, no. 21613/16, § 86, 31 October 2019, as regards ongoing or resolved poor conditions of detention; Jabari v. Turkey, no. 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, as regards removal to another State where the person concerned risks ill-treatment; Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC], no. 14305/17, §§ 207-08, 22 December 2020, as regards ongoing or completed deprivation of liberty; Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII, as regards unreasonably lengthy proceedings; Bączkowski and Others v. Poland, no. 1543/06, §§ 81-83, 3 May 2007, as regards a ban on assemblies whose dates were crucial for the organisers; Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, §§ 91-92, 9 July 2015, as regards structural difficulties preventing a disabled person from obtaining education; and Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

    Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
    In Bulgaria the Convention is part of domestic law, and has been held by the courts either to regulate directly the relations between private persons and the authorities, or at least to constitute an aid to the interpretation of domestic-law provisions (see Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, §§ 95-97, 27 January 2015).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

    Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
    46113/99 and 7 others, § 115, ECHR 2010).
  • EGMR, 23.06.2026 - 48663/20

    VARDAR c. ALLEMAGNE

    Rn. 14 The Court does not consider it necessary to address the Government's objection that the applicants had not exhausted the relevant criminal-law remedy in accordance with procedural law, or the question whether the application must be considered premature because of the pending civil proceedings (compare Dumpe v. Latvia (dec.), no. 71506/13, §§ 55 et seq., 16 October 2018, and Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 174, 30 January 2024), as the application is in any event inadmissible for the reasons set out below.
  • EGMR, 25.08.2026 - 30915/23

    ALEKSIEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    There is therefore no reason automatically to presume that in such proceedings they would treat arguments based on Articles 3 and 14 as irrelevant (see, mutatis mutandis, Stefanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 51127/18, § 80, 8 September 2020, and Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 227, 30 January 2024).
  • EGMR, 10.09.2024 - 24585/18

    PROKOPIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA and 1 other application

    On 1 July 2020 I.G. criticised a newspaper published by Economedia for shedding light on a high-profile case involving allegedly corrupt prosecutors (described in Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, 30 January 2024).

    It concluded that there was a fair chance that tort proceedings under domestic law concerned predominantly with another right could also provide redress in respect of complaints about an ulterior purpose such as those raised here (see Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, §§ 179, 196-200 and 227-29, 30 January 2024).

  • EGMR, 19.05.2026 - 938/21

    PETROVA v. BULGARIA

    Rn. 81 Under the Court's case-law, the question of whether the redress that a remedy can provide is adequate - and whether that remedy is thus sufficient - depends on the nature of the right under the Convention or its Protocols alleged to have been breached, as well as on the nature of the alleged breach (see Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, §§ 176-78, 30 January 2024, with further references).
  • EGMR, 12.05.2026 - 60342/19

    BUDINOVA AND ISAEV v. BULGARIA

    Conversely, applicants who had at their disposal a remedy clearly more suited to their situation must have attempted it instead (see Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 174, 30 January 2024, with further references).
  • EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 40669/16

    DIMITROVA v. BULGARIA

    Admittedly, a remedy that is only intended to afford redress in respect of certain grievances under the Convention can sometimes also be used to afford redress in respect of other kinds of Convention grievances (see, for instance, Stefanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 51127/18, §§ 77 and 80, 8 September 2020, and Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, §§ 227-28, 30 January 2024).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2024 - 1284/21

    EUROFOOTBALL OOD v. BULGARIA

    The Court cannot speculate on the approach the domestic courts might take and sees no reason to consider that they would not examine the matter fairly, in the light of the relevant circumstances and the evidence presented (see, mutatis mutandis, Stefanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 51127/18, § 77, 8 September 2020, and Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 192, 30 January 2024).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2026 - 34184/20

    KAHRAMAN v. TÜRKIYE

    However, to comply with the exhaustion rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, applicants who have at their disposal a domestic remedy plainly more suited to their situation must attempt it, even if they have already resorted to a less effective one (see Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 174, 30 January 2024; Dumpe v. Latvia, no. 71506/13, §§ 61 and 70-76, 16 October 2018; and Köhler v. Germany (dec.), no. 3443/18, §§ 67-74, 7 September 2021).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2026 - 35631/23

    SKREBYTÄ- v. LITHUANIA

    Rn. 21 To comply with the exhaustion rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, applicants who have at their disposal a domestic remedy plainly more suited to their situation must attempt it, even if they have already resorted to a less effective one (see Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, § 174, 30 January 2024, and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2024 - 48729/08

    PËRPARIMI SHA COMPANY AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

    Rn. 37 As to any possible damage the third applicant might have suffered due to the prolonged seizure of his property, he could have brought a civil action against the State, aimed at obtaining monetary compensation for any financial or other loss (compare Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, § 169, 1 June 2023, and Zlatanov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53050/21, §§ 184-85, 30 January 2024).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht