Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (35) Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09
TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski, cited above, §§ 35 and 40; Grzincic, cited above, §§ 99-106; Vokurka, cited above, § 49; Fakhretdinov and Others, cited above, §§ 30-31; Taron, cited above, §§ 36 and 42-44; and Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 49-56, 26 March 2013). - EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
In particular, the Court has previously departed from this rule in cases against Italy, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia and Turkey concerning newly introduced remedies in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.
- EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski, cited above, §§ 35 and 40; Grzincic, cited above, §§ 99-106; Vokurka, cited above, § 49; Fakhretdinov and Others, cited above, §§ 30-31; Taron, cited above, §§ 36 and 42-44; and Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 49-56, 26 March 2013). - EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
In particular, the Court has previously departed from this rule in cases against Italy, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia and Turkey concerning newly introduced remedies in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 62155/00
PROVIDE S.R.L. c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01
RÍMSKOKATOLICKÁ FARNOST OBRÍSTVÍ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
However, since the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 67, Series A no. 28; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 113 (b), Series A no. 61; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 77 (b), Series A no. 116; and, more recently, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 197, ECHR 2012), it should be observed that the Inspectorate enjoys considerable independence (see paragraphs 18 and 19 above). - EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
However, since the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 67, Series A no. 28; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 113 (b), Series A no. 61; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 77 (b), Series A no. 116; and, more recently, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 197, ECHR 2012), it should be observed that the Inspectorate enjoys considerable independence (see paragraphs 18 and 19 above). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
However, since the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 67, Series A no. 28; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 113 (b), Series A no. 61; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 77 (b), Series A no. 116; and, more recently, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 197, ECHR 2012), it should be observed that the Inspectorate enjoys considerable independence (see paragraphs 18 and 19 above). - EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 53126/07
TARON v. GERMANY
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
- EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 22689/07
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 10755/13
UZUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR - 19993/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 10200/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 21819/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 14163/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 13466/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02
GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 26716/09
FAKHRETDINOV and OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 24342/04
ZUNIC v. SLOVENIA
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.07.2024 - C-369/23
Vivacom Bulgaria - Vorabentscheidungsersuchen - Haftung eines Mitgliedstaats für …
{FN:5} Das vorlegende Gericht weist insoweit darauf hin, dass der EGMR in den Urteilen vom 10. Juli 2008, Mihalkov/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2008:0410JUD006771901), und vom 10. September 2018, Boyan Gospodinov/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD002841707), Verstöße gegen Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK festgestellt habe, nicht aber in seinen Entscheidungen vom 18. Juni 2013, Valcheva und Abrashev/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC000619411), und vom 18. Juni 2013, Balakchiev u. a./Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC006518710).{FN:43} Vgl. Urteile des EGMR vom 18. Juni 2013, Valcheva und Abrashev/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC000619411, § 100), und vom 18. Juni 2013, Balakchiev u. a./Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC006518710, § 61).
- EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12
S.Z. c. BULGARIE
Le texte des dispositions susmentionnées et les motifs de la réforme ont été reproduits dans la décision de la Cour (Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, §§ 20-34, 18 juin 2013).La Cour a déjà reconnu que ces recours pouvaient en principe apporter un redressement approprié en cas de violation de l'exigence de délai raisonnable et devaient être épuisés par les requérants potentiels préalablement à la saisine de la Cour (Balakchiev c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, 18 juin 2013, Valcheva and Abrashev c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 6194/11 et 34887/11, 18 juin 2013).
- EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 15452/07
DIMITROVA v. BULGARIA
The relevant domestic law regarding remedies for unreasonably long civil proceedings was set out in Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013.The Court, in Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013, decided that the domestic remedy introduced by the Government in respect of unreasonably long civil proceedings was effective and accessible.
- EuGH, 19.12.2024 - C-369/23
Vivacom Bulgaria - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Art. 19 Abs. 1 Unterabs. 2 EUV …
Rn. 22 Dagegen habe der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte in seinen Urteilen vom 18. Juni 2013, Valcheva und Abrashev/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC000619411), sowie vom 18. Juni 2013, Balakchiev u. a./Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC006518710), festgestellt, dass keine Verletzung der EMRK vorliege, da die Entschädigung für die durch die Tätigkeit der Gerichte verursachten Schäden aus einem gesonderten Posten des Haushalts des jeweiligen Gerichts stamme. - EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 73798/13
VALADA MATOS DAS NEVES c. PORTUGAL
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 75717/14
BRUDAN c. ROUMANIE
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Cocchiarella c. Italie ([GC], no 64886/01, § 38, CEDH 2006-V), et Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 21.05.2026 - 13721/23 However, States may also choose to introduce only a compensatory remedy, without that remedy being regarded as ineffective (see Fil LLC, cited above, § 47, and Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, § 57, 18 June 2013, with further references).
- EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA
These sums can hardly be seen as excessive for any but the most indigent litigants (see Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, § 63, 18 June 2013). - EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 29026/06
[ENG]
27451/09 and 60650/09, 23 September 2010 concerning the non-enforcement of judgments; Stella and 10 Other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 49169/09, 16 September 2014, and Łatak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010 concerning prison overcrowding; Techniki Olympiaki A.E. v. Greece (dec.), no. 40547/10, 1 October 2013; Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013, and Müdür Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013 concerning the length of proceedings; and Hodžić v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, 4 April 2017 concerning "old" foreign-currency savings). - EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 17708/12
OLIVIERI c. ITALIE
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Cocchiarella précité, § 38 ; Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 75414/10
KURBAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 4586/18
FULLANI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2025 - 42584/21
B & B PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CO LTD v. MALTA
- EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 44229/11
PENDOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 69591/14
KOLEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 03.12.2013 - 25451/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 31386/09
SARL LE CLUB ET AUTRES c. FRANCE et 1 autre requête
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37124/10
KOSTADINOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 72999/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 42218/13
SHEYTANOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 34783/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 21.12.2021 - 10108/16
SHIYANKOVA-KASAPSKA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 39351/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 28.01.2016 - 79828/12
ANDREEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 2092/08
MULINI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 4548/04
[FRE]
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 7456/06
TERZIEVA AND AVRAMOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 44448/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 23474/06
LEVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 30474/05
TASHEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 4434/07
GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 15650/06
KOSEKOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2019 - 44768/10
YANKOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10
LEONTE v. ROMANIA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".