Volltextveröffentlichungen (6)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GILLBERG v. SWEDEN

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inapplicable (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) Inapplicable (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life Article 8-2 - Interference) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GILLBERG c. SUEDE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inapplicable (Article 10-1 - Liberté d'expression) Inapplicable (Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie privée Article 8-2 - Ingérence) (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GILLBERG v. SWEDEN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Inapplicable (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Inapplicable (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8-2 - Interference)

• lda.brandenburg.de

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle, Anwendungsbereich/Zuständigkeit, Personenbezogene Daten

• fragdenstaat.de

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle - Anwendungsbereich/ Zuständigkeit - Personenbezogene Daten

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (3)

• internet-law.de (Kurzinformation)

  EGMR zur "negativen Meinungsfreiheit”

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• lda.brandenburg.de (Kurzinformation)

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle, Anwendungsbereich/Zuständigkeit, Personenbezogene Daten

Besprechungen u.ä.

• lehofer.at (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Fall Gillberg: Forschungsgeheimnis, Informationsfreiheit und Privatsphäre

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Gillberg v. Sweden

  [28.09.2011]

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

Wird zitiert von ... (24)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  To the extent that this is to be understood as a claim that the applicant's conviction affected the enjoyment of his "private life" because of its bearing on his professional activities (see, among other authorities, Turán v. Hungary, no. 33068/05, 6 July 2010; Sidabras and Dziautas (cited above); Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, Reports 1997-III; and Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B), the Court considers this form of economic suffering to be a foreseeable consequence of the commission of a criminal offence by the applicant in respect of which Article 8 cannot be relied on (see paragraph 68 above).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00

  SIDABRAS AND DZIAUTAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  The Court reiterates in this regard that Article 8 cannot be relied on in order to complain of a loss of reputation which is the foreseeable consequence of one's own actions such as, for example, the commission of a criminal offence (see, inter alia, Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 49, ECHR 2004-VIII, and Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 57, 18 January 2011).
• EGMR, 20.06.2000 - 33274/96

  FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  96. Finally, in so far as the applicant contended that his complaint fell within the scope of Article 10 of the Convention because his situation was comparable to that of lawyers protecting information obtained in confidence from their clients, the Court reiterates that the relevant case-law thereon, including access to correspondence with legal advisers, concerns Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Niemietz, cited above, and Foxley v. The United Kingdom, no. 33274/96, 20 June 2000).

• EGMR, 02.06.1993 - 16002/90

  K. c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  Referring to K. v. Austria (16002/90, GILLBERG v. SWEDEN JUDGMENT 25.
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  Britische DNA-Datenbanken verstoßen gegen die Europäische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  Article 8 protects in addition a right to personal development, and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see, for example, S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  83. The right to receive and impart information explicitly forms part of the right to freedom of expression under Article 10. That right basically prohibits a Government from restricting a person from receiving information that others wish or may be willing to impart to him (see, for example, Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 74, Series A no. 116, and Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 52, Series A no. 160).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  Moreover, Article 10 protects not only the substance of the ideas and information expressed but also the form in which they are conveyed (see among other authorities, Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 53, 12 September 2011).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  The Court notes, however, that the pertinent case-law on this subject concerns journalists' positive right to freedom of expression (see, inter alia, Goodwin (cited above); Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I; and Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, application no. 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  83. The right to receive and impart information explicitly forms part of the right to freedom of expression under Article 10. That right basically prohibits a Government from restricting a person from receiving information that others wish or may be willing to impart to him (see, for example, Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 74, Series A no. 116, and Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 52, Series A no. 160).
• EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 51772/99

  ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  The Court notes, however, that the pertinent case-law on this subject concerns journalists' positive right to freedom of expression (see, inter alia, Goodwin (cited above); Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I; and Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, application no. 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV).
• EKMR, 07.04.1994 - 20871/92

  STROHAL v. AUSTRIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 57292/16

  Recht auf Vergessen

  En ce qui concerne la notoriété de la personne visée et l'objet de l'article, la Cour a certes déjà dit, tel que le rappelle le requérant, qu'une personne ne peut invoquer l'article 8 de la Convention pour se plaindre d'une atteinte à sa réputation qui résulterait de manière prévisible de ses propres actions, telle une infraction pénale (Axel Springer AG, précité, § 83, Gillberg c. Suède [GC], no 41723/06, § 67, 3 avril 2012, Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko et autres c. Bosnie-Herzégovine [GC], no 17224/11, § 76, 27 juin 2017, M.L. et W.W. c. Allemagne, précité, § 88, et Denisov c. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, § 98, 25 septembre 2018).
• EuG, 28.01.2015 - T-341/12

  Evonik Degussa / Kommission - Wettbewerb - Verwaltungsverfahren - Europäischer …

  Rn. 125 Auch wenn aber die Kommission, soweit sie im Rahmen ihrer Untersuchung eines Verstoßes gegen das Kartellrecht der Union von Unternehmen Informationen einholt, diesen Artikel grundsätzlich zu wahren hat, kann sich doch nach ständiger Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte eine Person nicht auf Art. 8 EMRK berufen, um eine Schädigung ihres Rufs geltend zu machen, die in vorhersehbarer Weise aus ihren eigenen Handlungen wie etwa einer Straftat resultiert (vgl. EGMR, Urteile Sidabras und Džiautas/Litauen vom 27. Juli 2004, 1ndividualbeschwerden Nrn. 55480/00 und 59330/00, § 49, Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2004-VIII, S. 367, Taliadorou und Stylianou/Zypern vom 16. Oktober 2008, 1ndividualbeschwerden Nrn. 39627/05 und 39631/05, § 56, und Gillberg/Schweden vom 3. April 2012, 1ndividualbeschwerde Nr. 41723/06, § 67).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 53176/17

  GRAZULEVICIUTÄ- v. LITHUANIA

  When it comes to the consequences of the applicant's suspension, the first question which arises is whether there can be any scope for an issue under Article 8 in the light of the Gillberg exclusionary principle (see Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 68, 3 April 2012; see also Denisov, cited above, § 98).

  In this respect, the Court has held that the notion of "private life" may include professional activities (see Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and also reiterates that Article 8 protects the right to personal development (see Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012; and Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), and the case-law cited therein).

  In this respect it must be mentioned that the notion of "private life" may include professional activities (see Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and that Article 8 protects the right to personal development (see Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012; and Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), and the case-law cited therein).

• BVerwG, 04.01.2024 - 20 F 3.22

  Geheimhaltung von Prüfervoten

  Dies wird teilweise bezweifelt (BayObLG…, Beschluss vom 28. Juli 2020 - 8 St ObWs 5/20 - NStZ 2021, 631 Rn. 19 - 23 unter Verweis auf EGMR, Urteil vom 3. April 2012 - 41723/06 - NLMR 2012, 100 ).
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 15271/16

  BALDASSI c. FRANCE et 6 autres affaires

  À cela il faut ajouter qu'outre la substance des idées et informations exprimées, l'article 10 protège aussi leur mode d'expression (voir, par exemple, Lehideux et Isorni c. France, 23 septembre 1998, § 52, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998 VII, Palomo Sánchez et autres c. Espagne [GC], nos 28955/06 et 3 autres, § 53, CEDH 2011, Gillberg c. Suède [GC], no 41723/06, § 82, 3 avril 2012, et Bédat c. Suisse [GC], no 56925/08, § 58, 29 mars 2016, ainsi que les références qui y sont indiquées).
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 21181/19

  TULEYA v. POLAND

  On the other hand, in Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 121, 25 September 2018, the Court adopted a different approach in the context of disciplinary liability, invoking in particular an obiter dictum in Gillberg v. Sweden ([GC], no. 41723/06, § 70, 3 April 2012).
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 25527/13

  VICENT DEL CAMPO v. SPAIN

  The concept of "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see, among other authorities, Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 109, 12 June 2014, and Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012), which covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person and can therefore embrace multiple aspects of a person's identity, such as a name or elements relating to a person's right to their image (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, 4 December 2008, and Axel Springer AG [GC], cited above, § 83; with further references therein).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 21.12.2016 - C-213/15

  Generalanwalt Bobek schlägt einen umfassenderen Zugang zu Dokumenten des …

  {FN:30} - Vgl. z. B. Urteile des EGMR vom 10. Juli 2006, Sdružení Jihočeské Matky/Tschechische Republik (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0710DEC001910103), vom 14. April 2009, Társaság a Szabadságjogokért/Ungarn (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414JUD003737405, § 35), vom 3. April 2012, Gillberg/Schweden (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD004172306, § 82 und 83), und vom 17. Februar 2015, Guseva/Bulgarien (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217JUD000698707, § 53).
• EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 39325/20

  ? EKS v. CROATIA

  Furthermore, the Court has accorded a high level of protection to academic researchers (see Baskaya and Okçuoglu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, §§ 61-67, ECHR 1999-IV; Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475/05, § 42, 26 May 2009; and Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 93, 3 April 2012) and authors of literature on matters of public concern (see Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 68, ECHR 2004-VI, Karsai v. Hungary, no. 5380/07, § 35, 1 December 2009 and Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 37027/22

  Google vs. Russland: EGMR kippt Billionen-Bußgelder gegen YouTube

  Rn. 90 The Court reiterates that the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention may also encompass a negative aspect - specifically, the right not to be compelled to express oneself (see Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, §§ 85-86, 3 April 2012, and Semir Güzel v. Turkey, no. 29483/09, §§ 27-29, 13 September 2016).
• BVerwG, 04.01.2024 - 20 F 4.22

  Geheimhaltungsbedürftigkeit von privaten Forschungsergebnissen als geistiges …
• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 24547/18

  THÖRN v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 05.02.2026 - 46238/20

  MORAWIEC v. POLAND
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 26892/12

  WANNER v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 36705/16

  MARGARI v. GREECE
• EGMR, 24.04.2025 - 16497/20

  SYTNYK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76730/12

  BALLIKTA?ž BINGÖLLÜ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 13.02.2025 - 56310/15

  K.P. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 29483/09

  GÜZEL v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  BUDIMIR v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 27.08.2024 - 28540/20

  N.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 19557/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 14628/08

  ESKILSSON v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 25832/14

  PEKÜNLÜ c. TURQUIE