Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08, 13136/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OLARU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Respondent State to take measures of a general character Just satisfaction reserved (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08, 13136/07
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 476/07
- EGMR - 476/07
Wird zitiert von ... (62)
- EGMR - 476/07
[ENG]
Applications no. 476/07, 22539/05,17911/08 and 13136/07 by Vasile OLARU, Vera GUSAN, Artur, Corina and Olivia LUNGU and Simion RACU against Moldova lodged on 11 December 2006, 31 May 2005, 2 April 2008 and 3 January 2007.Application no. 22539/05 by Vera GUSAN}}.
Application no. 17911/08 by Artur, Corina and Olivia LUNGU}}.
Application no. 13136/07 by Simion RACU}}.
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07
ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE
La Cour renvoie aux principes fondamentaux qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence relative à l'application de l'article 46 de la Convention (Bourdov c. Russie (no 2), no 33509/04, §§ 125-128, CEDH 2009 (extraits) ; Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, §§ 49-52, 28 juillet 2009 ; Maria Atanasiu et autres c. Roumanie, nos 30767/05 et 33800/06, §§ 210-214; 12 octobre 2010, Vassilios Athanasiou et autres c. Grèce, no 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 décembre 2010; Finger c. Bulgarie, no 37346/05, §§ 113, 10 mai 2011; Rumpf c. Allemagne, no 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 septembre 2010) ainsi qu'à l'article 61 de son règlement, disposition relative à la procédure de l'arrêt pilote. - EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05
[FRE]
Il revient d'abord aux autorités internes, notamment au Parlement, de peser les avantages et désavantages inhérents aux diverses solutions entre lesquelles choisir, tout en sachant qu'il s'agit là d'un choix politique (voir James et autres, précité, §§ 68-69, et, mutatis mutandis, Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, § 55, 28 juillet 2009).
- EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 43346/08
BOTNARU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
La présente affaire a été communiquée au Gouvernement dans le prolongement de l'arrêt pilote Olaru et autres (nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, 28 juillet 2009).(...) Par ailleurs, les juridictions nationales ont accordé le logement social au requérant en sa qualité de juge (similaire avec l'affaire Lungu c. République de Moldova (satisfaction équitable - règlement amiable), no 17911/08, 6 avril 2010).
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 21040/06
PROHOROV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Having regard to the decision to communicate the application following the adoption of the pilot judgment in the case of Olaru and Others (Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009),.The case was communicated to the Government following the adoption of the pilot judgment in the case of Olaru and others (Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009).
- EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 35729/12
BARTA AND DRAJKÓ v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 13272/07
STRELTOV v. MOLDOVA
Having regard to the decision to communicate these applications following the adoption of the pilot judgment in the case of Olaru and others (Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009),.As with the applicants in the pilot judgment of Olaru and others (Olaru and others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009), the applicants in the instant cases complained of a breach of their rights guaranteed under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 as a result of the authorities" failure to comply with final judicial decisions delivered by domestic courts in their favour.
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06
DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA
A summary of the principles applicable to pilot judgments may be found in the Court's judgments in the cases of Broniowski (cited above, §§ 188-94), Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) (no. 33509/04, §§ 125-28, ECHR 2009-...), Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-49, 28 July 2009), Rumpf v. Germany (no. 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 September 2010) and Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece (no. 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 December 2010), as well as in the newly adopted Rule 61 of the Rules of Court (which was inserted by the Court on 21 February 2011 and came into force on 1 April 2011). - EGMR, 07.09.2010 - 15207/07
VILCU ET LUCHIAN c. MOLDOVA
Vu la décision de la Cour du 10 novembre 2009 de communiquer ces affaires au gouvernement défendeur à la suite de l'adoption de l'arrêt pilote Olaru et autres (Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, 28 juillet 2009),.À l'instar des requérants dans l'arrêt pilote Olaru et autres (Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, 28 juillet 2009), les requérants, dans les présentes affaires, ont soulevé des griefs tirés de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention et de l'article 1 du Protocole no 1 à la Convention en raison de l'omission du Gouvernement d'exécuter les arrêts définitifs l'obligeant à fournir aux intéressées des logements sociaux.
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 37346/05
FINGER v. BULGARIA
A summary of the principles applicable to pilot judgments may be found in the Court's judgments in the cases of Broniowski (cited above, §§ 188-94), Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) (no. 33509/04, §§ 125-28, ECHR 2009-...), Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-49, 28 July 2009), Rumpf v. Germany (no. 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 September 2010) and Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece (no. 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 December 2010), as well as in the newly adopted Rule 61 of the Rules of Court (which was inserted by the Court on 21 February 2011 and came into force on 1 April 2011). - EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 44746/08
BALAN v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 2916/02
LUNTRE CONTRE MOLDOVA ET 52 AUTRES AFFAIRES
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 31856/07
MANASCURTA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 17899/08
BOTEZATU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 40047/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 33328/06
MODRANGA ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 79/07
PASCAL c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR - 37346/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 17986/09
PARASCA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 55349/07
BUREA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 12674/07
VARTIC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 22267/08
MALAI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 10823/06
BONDARENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 26740/08
UNCU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 9209/08
ANTOCI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20935/05
BARANOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR - 48059/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 19607/08
VASILASCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 19604/08
DUCA ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 27807/07
DOBROVOLSCHI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 29626/09
TABACARU ET GUTU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50905/08
CHIRICA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 7847/06
TIRNOVETCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 30683/08
CHIRIACOV ET FURCULITA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 37262/07
BÎRCA c. REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 17988/09
SISCANU v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 40832/09
CIOBANU c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 44734/08
LIPCAN c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 42049/08
POPOVICI c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 13980/08
IORDACHESCU c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 29012/06
PROTAP c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 15953/07
CHETRUS c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 476/07
OLARU v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 22539/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 15953/07
CHETRUS c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 4771/09
MORARI AND SPIRIDONOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 28355/08
PADURARU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 13333/07
GLOBA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 13431/06
SCHERLET AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 15974/07
DRUJCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 39503/06
CONOVALI v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 45653/05
BIZGU c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 42374/07
NACU c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 16128/07
COJOCARU c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 17933/08
SPEDT ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 13258/07
MUNTEAN c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 15279/07
PECIUL AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 56386/10
ROTARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 44417/05
BOGDAN ET CIORAP c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 17911/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 45653/05
BIZGU v. MOLDOVA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RACU v. MOLDOVA
Just satisfaction - Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 13136/07
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
Wird zitiert von ... (13) Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 53487/99
MERIAKRI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
Having regard to the amount of compensation proposed, which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Ungureanu v. Moldova, no. 27568/02, § 39, 6 September 2007), the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the remainder of the case (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar, cited above, and Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005). - EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 6923/03
MELNIC v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
To this end, the Court will examine the declaration carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI, and Melnic v. Moldova, no. 6923/03, §§ 22-25, 14 November 2006). - EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07
OLARU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
476/07, 22539/05 and 17911/08 and formed part of the overall case of Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009). - EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 27568/02
UNGUREANU v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
Having regard to the amount of compensation proposed, which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Ungureanu v. Moldova, no. 27568/02, § 39, 6 September 2007), the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the remainder of the case (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar, cited above, and Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005).
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 44746/08
BALAN v. MOLDOVA
On 28 July 2009 the Court delivered the Olaru and others pilot judgment (see Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009) in which it found, inter alia, that the problem of non-enforcement of domestic judgments awarding social housing to different categories of individuals disclosed the existence of a "systemic problem". - EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 21151/04
MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA
Having regard to the above considerations and to the amount of compensation proposed by the Government, which appears to be equitable in the present case, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the case (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see Racu v. Moldova (just satisfaction - striking out), no. 13136/07, 20 April 2010). - EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 31856/07
MANASCURTA v. MOLDOVA
On 28 July 2009 the Court delivered the Olaru and others pilot judgment (see Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009) in which it found, inter alia, that the problem of non-enforcement of domestic judgments awarding social housing to different categories of individuals disclosed the existence of a "systemic problem".
- EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 10823/06
BONDARENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
The Court notes that in Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, § 61, 28 July 2009) it concluded that the applicants in cases referring to social housing, lodged before the delivery of that judgment, were dispensed from exhausting the new remedy put in place after the delivery of that pilot judgment. - EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 63242/00
DONATI c. ITALIE
De plus, rien n'empêche un gouvernement défendeur de soumettre une déclaration unilatérale, comme c'est le cas en l'espèce, dans le cadre de la phase de la procédure se rapportant à l'article 41 de la Convention (voir notamment les arrêts Racu c. Moldova (satisfaction équitable - radiation), no 13136/07, 20 avril 2010, et Megadat.com SRL c. Moldova (satisfaction équitable - radiation), no 21151/04, 17 mai 2011). - EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 6397/04
BUSHATI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
Moreover, there is nothing to prevent a respondent Government from submitting a unilateral declaration relating, as in the instant case, to the reserved Article 41 procedure (see Megadat.com SRL v. Moldova (just satisfaction - striking out), no. 21151/04, § 10, 17 May 2011; and Racu v. Moldova (just satisfaction - striking out), no. 13136/07, § 17, 20 April 2010). - EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20935/05
BARANOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 7847/06
TIRNOVETCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 17988/09
SISCANU v. MOLDOVA
On 28 July 2009 the Court delivered the Olaru and others pilot judgment (see Olaru and Others v. Moldova, nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, 28 July 2009) in which it found, inter alia, that the problem of non-enforcement of domestic judgments awarding social housing to different categories of individuals disclosed the existence of a "systemic problem". - EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 9074/07
MULLAI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
Moreover, there is nothing to prevent a respondent Government from submitting a unilateral declaration relating, as in the instant case, to the reserved Article 41 procedure (see Megadat.com SRL v. Moldova (just satisfaction - striking out), no. 21151/04, § 10, 17 May 2011; and Racu v. Moldova (just satisfaction - striking out), no. 13136/07, § 17, 20 April 2010). - EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 13333/07
GLOBA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 13431/06
SCHERLET AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 45653/05
BIZGU v. MOLDOVA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 13136/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RACU v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 13136/07
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 13136/07
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".