Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21, 6321/21, 9227/21 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FABBRI ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN
Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Exception préliminaire retenue (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Partiellement ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
- EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21, 6321/21, 9227/21
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (47)
- EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
In subsequent case-law, the Court (at both Grand Chamber and Chamber levels) has repeatedly found Article 6 to be applicable to such proceedings from the moment that an applicant has joined the criminal proceedings as a civil party, or has asked to do so, in accordance with the requirements of national law (see, for example, Gorou, cited above, §§ 25-36; more recently, Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 207, 25 June 2019, and, by implication, Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 361, ECHR 2014 (extracts), all at Grand Chamber level[8]).[17] [GC], no. 41720/13, § 207, 25 June 2019.
- EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
Rn. 65 The applicants considered that Article 6 § 1 was applicable in the present case, relying on Arnoldi (cited above) and Petrella v. Italy (no. 24340/07, 18 March 2021).[15] no. 24340/07, 18 March 2021.
- EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 35637/04
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
It relied on Arnoldi v. Italy (no. 35637/04, 7 December 2017), considering that there was no reason to question the applicants' will to pursue their civil claims and that the outcome of the criminal investigation would have been decisive for the determination of their civil rights.[16] no. 35637/04, 7 December 2017.
- EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 75614/14
MARIN v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
Rn. 136 Lastly, it cannot be ignored that in respect of access to court complaints, in the wider context (that is beyond those limited to civil claims brought during criminal proceedings), the Court has regularly taken into account other remedies available to the applicants (see, for example, Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, § 124, 1 June 2023; Ndayegamiye-Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no. 16874/12, § 64, 5 February 2019; Klausecker v. Germany (dec.), no. 415/07, §§ 69-77, 6 January 2015; C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy (no. 2), no. 2/08, § 50, 6 April 2010; Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877/98, § 64, ECHR 2003-I; and Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 67-68, ECHR 1999-I; see also Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, § 138, 12 January 2021, and Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, § 87, 12 January 2021, which followed the same ratio in the context of a fairness complaint).56842/08 and 7 others, § 22, 24 November 2015; Baka v. Greece, no. 24891/10, § 21, 18 February 2016; Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, §§ 12 and 137, 12 January 2021, Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, §§ 6 and 80, 12 January 2021; Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187/12, §§ 36-38, 16 March 2021; M. v. France (dec.), no. 42821/18, § 79, 26 April 2022; and Diémert v. France, no. 71244/17, § 26, 30 March 2023.
- EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 55081/09
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
In the second line of cases, where civil-party claims made in the context of criminal proceedings had not been examined on account of the termination of those proceedings, the Court considered that where the domestic legal order provided litigants with an avenue of redress, such as a civil claim in the context of criminal proceedings, the State was under an obligation to ensure that they enjoyed the fundamental guarantees laid down in Article 6 § 1 (see, in particular, Anagnostopoulos v. Greece, §§ 30-34, no. 54589/00, 3 April 2003; Gousis v. Greece, no. 8863/03, §§ 30-35, 29 March 2007; Atanasova v. Bulgaria, no. 72001/01, §§ 40-47, 2 October 2008; Dinchev v. Bulgaria, no. 23057/03, §§ 50-52, 22 January 2009; Tonchev v. Bulgaria, no. 18527/02, §§ 50-53, 19 November 2009; Boris Stojanovski, cited above, §§ 56-57; Korkolis v. Greece, no. 63300/09, §§ 22-25, 15 January 2015; Rokas v. Greece, no. 55081/09, §§ 23-24, 22 September 2015; and Petrella, cited above, §§ 53- 54).[8] See also, at Chamber level, Potier v. France, no. 42272/98, § 44, 8 November 2005; Tsalkitzis v. Greece, no. 11801/04, §§ 29-31, 16 November 2006; Gousis v. Greece, no. 8863/03, § 29, 29 March 2007; Atanasova v. Bulgaria, no. 72001/01, §§ 10 and 36, 2 October 2008; Syngelidis v. Greece, no. 24895/07, §§ 27-30, 11 February 2010; Li&gcedil;eres v. Latvia, no. 17/02, § 58, 28 June 2011; Korkolis v. Greece, no. 63300/09, § 17, 15 January 2015, Rokas v. Greece, no. 55081/09, § 18, 22 September 2015; Alexandrescu and Others v. Romania, nos.
- EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 3795/15
MIHAIL MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
Rn. 136 Lastly, it cannot be ignored that in respect of access to court complaints, in the wider context (that is beyond those limited to civil claims brought during criminal proceedings), the Court has regularly taken into account other remedies available to the applicants (see, for example, Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, § 124, 1 June 2023; Ndayegamiye-Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no. 16874/12, § 64, 5 February 2019; Klausecker v. Germany (dec.), no. 415/07, §§ 69-77, 6 January 2015; C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy (no. 2), no. 2/08, § 50, 6 April 2010; Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877/98, § 64, ECHR 2003-I; and Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 67-68, ECHR 1999-I; see also Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, § 138, 12 January 2021, and Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, § 87, 12 January 2021, which followed the same ratio in the context of a fairness complaint).56842/08 and 7 others, § 22, 24 November 2015; Baka v. Greece, no. 24891/10, § 21, 18 February 2016; Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, §§ 12 and 137, 12 January 2021, Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, §§ 6 and 80, 12 January 2021; Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187/12, §§ 36-38, 16 March 2021; M. v. France (dec.), no. 42821/18, § 79, 26 April 2022; and Diémert v. France, no. 71244/17, § 26, 30 March 2023.
- EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 42821/18
M c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
63610/00 and 38692/05, § 91, 4 October 2007; Georgi Georgiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 34137/03, 11 January 2011; Borobar and Others v. Romania, no. 5663/04, § 56, 29 January 2013; Association of the Victims of S.C. Rompetrol S.A. and S.C. Geomin S.A. and Others v. Romania, no. 24133/03, § 65, 25 June 2013; S.O.S racisme - Touche pas à mon pote v. Belgium (dec.), no. 26341/11, §§ 30-34, 12 January 2016; Dimitras v. Greece, no. 11946/11, § 47, 19 April 2018; Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase, cited above, §§ 199-202; and M. v. France (dec.), no. 42821/18, § 79, 26 April 2022).56842/08 and 7 others, § 22, 24 November 2015; Baka v. Greece, no. 24891/10, § 21, 18 February 2016; Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, §§ 12 and 137, 12 January 2021, Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, §§ 6 and 80, 12 January 2021; Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187/12, §§ 36-38, 16 March 2021; M. v. France (dec.), no. 42821/18, § 79, 26 April 2022; and Diémert v. France, no. 71244/17, § 26, 30 March 2023.
- EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 53600/20
Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz u.a. ./. Schweiz - Staatliche Maßnahmen gegen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 44, 25 September 2018, and Grzęda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, § 257, 15 March 2022, both with further references; see also Grosam, cited above, § 108, and Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 53600/20, § 595, 9 April 2024). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
In this way, Article 6 § 1 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, is one particular aspect (see, among other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Al- Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 126, 21 June 2016; Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, § 113, 15 March 2018; and Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase, cited above, § 192). - EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
Rn. 136 Lastly, it cannot be ignored that in respect of access to court complaints, in the wider context (that is beyond those limited to civil claims brought during criminal proceedings), the Court has regularly taken into account other remedies available to the applicants (see, for example, Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, § 124, 1 June 2023; Ndayegamiye-Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no. 16874/12, § 64, 5 February 2019; Klausecker v. Germany (dec.), no. 415/07, §§ 69-77, 6 January 2015; C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy (no. 2), no. 2/08, § 50, 6 April 2010; Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877/98, § 64, ECHR 2003-I; and Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 67-68, ECHR 1999-I; see also Victor Laurenţiu Marin v. Romania, no. 75614/14, § 138, 12 January 2021, and Mihail Mihăilescu v. Romania, no. 3795/15, § 87, 12 January 2021, which followed the same ratio in the context of a fairness complaint). - EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
Denisov v. Ukraine
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 43572/18
GRZĘDA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
PEREZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.07.2020 - 310/15
Mugemangango v. Belgium
- EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02
LIGERES v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 40877/98
CORDOVA c. ITALIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01
- EGMR - 68271/14 (anhängig)
HALL v. ICELAND
- EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 27849/03
BEYAZGÜL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 16874/12
NDAYEGAMIYE-MPORAMAZINA c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 10675/02
KUSMIEREK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 12316/07
POPOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 46815/09
REISNER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 3757/09
ALP c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.07.2018 - 62784/09
KAMENOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10
UDALOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 59227/12
FOUQUET c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 65107/16
GARCIA GONZALEZ v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 45187/12
HUSSEIN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56195/00
KRUMPEL AND KRUMPELOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 01.03.2011 - 11868/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 30.03.2023 - 71244/17
DIÉMERT c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 24314/13
FISCHER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 24891/10
[FRE]
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
[FRE]
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 26775/02
SOTTANI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 54589/00
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 02.10.2006 - 29858/03
DUCHONOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 27969/10
BRUNI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 24133/03
[FRE]
- EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 11946/11
DIMITRAS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 26341/11
S.O.S. RACISME - TOUCHE PAS À MON POTE c. BELGIQUE
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21, 345/21, 6321/21, 9227/21 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil));Pecuniary damage - ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21, 345/21, 6321/21, 9227/21
- EGMR, 24.09.2024 - 6319/21
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (19)
- EGMR - 345/21 (anhängig)
FOSCHI v. SAN MARINO and 3 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
the applications (nos. 345/21, 6319/21, 6321/21 and 9227/21) against the Republic of San Marino lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by three San Marinese nationals, Mr Mario Foschi, Mr Stellino Fabbri and Mr Andrea Forcellini and one Italian national Ms Angelina Marro ("the applicants"), on the various dates indicated in the appended table;.Application no. 345/21 - Mr Foschi.
345/21, 6319/21 and 6321/21.
(α) Application no. 345/21.
The same cannot be said of application no. 345/21, which, in view of the considerations made at paragraphs 43-46 above, must be declared incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention and, as such, inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.
6319/21, 6321/21 and 9227/21 admissible, and the remainder of the applications (no. 345/21) inadmissible;.
345/21 Foschi v. San Marino 15/12/2020.
As far as the first applicant (application no. 345/21) is concerned, I agree that the complaint is inadmissible, and thus incapable of giving rise to any finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1.
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
In this way, Article 6 § 1 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, is one particular aspect (see, among other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 126, 21 June 2016; and Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, § 113, 15 March 2018).As the Court stated in Golder v. the United Kingdom (21 February 1975, Series A no. 18), the principle whereby a civil claim must be capable of being submitted to a judge for determination ranks as one of the universally recognised fundamental principles of law.
- EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
However, in cases where at the stage of the preliminary investigation there was no possibility to join the proceedings as a civil party in accordance with domestic law, but nevertheless injured parties could exercise rights and powers expressly afforded to them by law, and had actually done so, the Court concluded that the civil limb of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was applicable to the criminal proceedings in which the applicants participated as an injured party but not as a civil party (see Sottani v. Italy (dec.), no. 26775/02, ECHR 2005-III (extracts), Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy no. 10180/04, §§ 31-33, 20 April 2006, Arnoldi, cited above, §§ 25-44, and more recently, Petrella v. Italy, no. 24340/07, § 23, 18 March 2021).In this regard, the majority rely on the Chamber judgment in Petrella v. Italy (no. 24340/07, 18 March 2021).
- EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
Therefore, Article 6 applies to proceedings involving civil-party complaints from the moment the complainant is joined as a civil party, unless he or she has waived the right to reparation in an unequivocal manner (ibid. § 25, and Florin Ionescu v. Romania, no. 24916/05, § 55, 24 May 2011), even during the preliminary investigation stage taken on its own (see Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 207, 25 June 2019).Firstly, we would point out that the Grand Chamber of the Court has quite recently addressed the issue in the case of Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania ([GC], no. 41720/13, 25 June 2019), reaching the conclusion that the right of access to a court had not been violated.
- EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
PEREZ c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
To fall within the scope of the Convention such right must be indissociable from the victim's exercise of a right to bring civil proceedings in domestic law, even if only to secure symbolic reparation or to protect a civil right such as the right to a "good reputation" (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I, and Gorou v. Greece (no. 2) [GC], no. 12686/03, § 24, 20 March 2009).While it is true that the Court has held that Article 6 applies to criminal proceedings involving civil-party claims from the time when the complainant is joined as a civil party (unless there has been a valid waiver of the right), the fact remains that the leading cases cited in this respect (Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, ECHR 2004-I, and Gorou v. Greece (no. 2) [GC], no. 12686/03, 20 March 2009) did not concern situations where the criminal investigation had produced no findings at all.
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11
Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
Secondly, the Convention imposes a positive obligation on States to conduct criminal investigations in limited sets of circumstances only, namely in the context of the procedural obligations arising under the substantive provisions protecting the core rights, in particular Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Convention as well as some of the most serious violations of personal integrity under Article 8. In this respect, it is also to be borne in mind that duties of investigation arising under those substantive provisions are wider than the specific duties to conduct criminal investigations (see, for instance, Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase, cited above, §§ 157-159; Cestaro v. Italy; no. 6884/11, §§ 204-209, 7 April 2015; Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 285, ECHR 2010 (extracts); and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, §§ 81-85, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 15.07.2003 - 33400/96
ERNST ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
In cases where the applicants had at their disposal accessible and effective avenues for their civil claims, it found that their right of access to a court had not been infringed (see Assenov and Others, cited above, § 112; Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400/96, §§ 54-55, 15 July 2003; Moldovan and Others v. Romania (no. 2), nos. - EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 32250/08
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
In consequence, the Court considers that any such appeal had no prospects of success (compare and contrast, albeit in the context of an assessment under Article 13, Diamante and Pelliccioni v. San Marino, no. 32250/08, §§ 194 and 199, 27 September 2011, where the proceedings had been discontinued because, following the examination of evidence, the judge had found that the prerequisites of the offence had not existed (§ 124)). - EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
41138/98 and 64320/01, §§ 119-22, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts); Forum Maritime S.A. v. Romania, nos. - EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 87/18
S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 24133/03
[FRE]
- EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 54589/00
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 28.10.2021 - 23264/18
MICALLEF v. MALTA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 26775/02
SOTTANI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
[FRE]
- EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 35637/04
[FRE]
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 24916/05
[FRE]
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 345/21, 6319/21, 6321/21, 9227/21 |
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
FOSCHI v. SAN MARINO and 3 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... (9) Zitiert selbst (2)
- SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
Auszug aus EGMR - 345/21
15/12/2020. - EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 35637/04
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR - 345/21
Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in its civil head applicable to the investigation proceedings ensuing from the applicants' criminal complaints (see, for example, Arnoldi v. Italy, no. 35637/04, §§ 36-41, 7 December 2017)? In particular, what rights pertain to injured parties during the investigation stage, and have the applicants exercised any such rights in the present cases?.
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21
FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
the applications (nos. 345/21, 6319/21, 6321/21 and 9227/21) against the Republic of San Marino lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by three San Marinese nationals, Mr Mario Foschi, Mr Stellino Fabbri and Mr Andrea Forcellini and one Italian national Ms Angelina Marro ("the applicants"), on the various dates indicated in the appended table;.Application no. 345/21 - Mr Foschi.
345/21, 6319/21 and 6321/21.
(α) Application no. 345/21.
The same cannot be said of application no. 345/21, which, in view of the considerations made at paragraphs 43-46 above, must be declared incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention and, as such, inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.
6319/21, 6321/21 and 9227/21 admissible, and the remainder of the applications (no. 345/21) inadmissible;.
345/21 Foschi v. San Marino 15/12/2020.
As far as the first applicant (application no. 345/21) is concerned, I agree that the complaint is inadmissible, and thus incapable of giving rise to any finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1.
- VG Lüneburg, 03.05.2024 - 1 A 213/22
Kolumbien: interner Schutz für Ehepaar in einer der Großstädte möglich; …
Auch wenn die allgemeine Erkenntnislage zu Kolumbien nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen darf, dass insbesondere die spezifische Gemengelage aus verschiedenen, sich gegenseitig bekämpfenden Gruppierungen und Drogenbanden in Kolumbien im Zuge der Entwaffnung der FARC zu Machtkämpfen und zu einer weiteren Zersplitterung des Konfliktes auf Gruppen ohne hierarchische Struktur geführt hat, weshalb von einer vollständigen Beseitigung der Gewalt nicht gesprochen werden kann, ist das Gericht davon überzeugt, dass ein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt im Sinne des § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 3 AsylG in Kolumbien nicht besteht (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v.) und den Klägern eine sichere Rückkehr - insbesondere in die genannten Großstädte - möglich wäre. - VG Lüneburg, 11.09.2023 - 1 A 177/22
Kolumbien: interner Schutz für alleinstehenden Mann in einer der Großstädte …
Auch wenn die allgemeine Erkenntnislage zu Kolumbien nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen darf, dass insbesondere die spezifische Gemengelage aus verschiedenen, sich gegenseitig bekämpfenden Gruppierungen und Drogenbanden in Kolumbien im Zuge der Entwaffnung der FARC zu Machtkämpfen und zu einer weiteren Zersplitterung des Konfliktes auf Gruppen ohne hierarchische Struktur geführt hat, weshalb von einer vollständigen Beseitigung der Gewalt nicht gesprochen werden kann, ist das Gericht davon überzeugt, dass ein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt im Sinne des § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 3 AsylG in Kolumbien nicht besteht (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v.) und dem Kläger eine sichere Rückkehr - insbesondere in die genannten Großstädte - möglich wäre.
- VG Lüneburg, 17.05.2023 - 1 A 87/22
Kolumbien: keine flüchtlingsrechtlich relevante Verfolgung oder drohender …
Auch wenn die allgemeine Erkenntnislage zu Kolumbien nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen darf, dass insbesondere die spezifische Gemengelage aus verschiedenen, sich gegenseitig bekämpfenden Gruppierungen und Drogenbanden in Kolumbien im Zuge der Entwaffnung der FARC zu Machtkämpfen und zu einer weiteren Zersplitterung des Konfliktes auf Gruppen ohne hierarchische Struktur geführt hat, weshalb von einer vollständigen Beseitigung der Gewalt nicht gesprochen werden kann, ist das Gericht davon überzeugt, dass ein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt im Sinne des § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 3 AsylG in Kolumbien nicht besteht (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v.) und dem Kläger eine sichere Rückkehr - insbesondere in die Großstädte - möglich wäre. - VG Lüneburg, 07.11.2022 - 1 A 129/22
Kolumbien: interner Schutz für Mutter mit zwei minderjährigen Kindern in einer …
Auch wenn die allgemeine Erkenntnislage zu Kolumbien nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen darf, dass insbesondere die spezifische Gemengelage aus verschiedenen, sich gegenseitig bekämpfenden Gruppierungen und Drogenbanden in Kolumbien im Zuge der Entwaffnung der FARC zu Machtkämpfen und zu einer weiteren Zersplitterung des Konfliktes auf Gruppen ohne hierarchische Struktur geführt hat, weshalb von einer vollständigen Beseitigung der Gewalt nicht gesprochen werden kann, ist das Gericht davon überzeugt, dass ein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt im Sinne des § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 3 AsylG in Kolumbien derzeit nicht (mehr) besteht (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v). - VG Lüneburg, 22.07.2024 - 1 A 37/23
Kolumbien: Widersprüchliches Vorbringen; Inländische Fluchtalternative; …
Gleichwohl besteht in Kolumbien kein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v.). - VG Lüneburg, 23.06.2022 - 1 A 3/20
Kolumbien: Keine flüchtlingsrechtlich relevante staatliche bzw. nichtstaatlich …
Auch wenn die allgemeine Erkenntnislage zu Kolumbien nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen darf, dass insbesondere die spezifische Gemengelage aus verschiedenen, sich gegenseitig bekämpfenden Gruppierungen und Drogenbanden in Kolumbien im Zuge der Entwaffnung der FARC zu Machtkämpfen und zu einer weiteren Zersplitterung des Konfliktes auf Gruppen ohne hierarchische Struktur geführt hat, weshalb von einer vollständigen Beseitigung der Gewalt nicht gesprochen werden kann, ist das Gericht davon überzeugt, dass ein landesweiter bewaffneter Konflikt im Sinne des § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 3 AsylG in Kolumbien derzeit nicht (mehr) besteht (vgl. auch Nds. OVG, Beschl. v. 8.11.2021 - 11 LA 345/21 -, n.v., Beschl. v. 15.9.2021 - 11 LA 196/21 -, n.v.). - VG Göttingen, 27.02.2024 - 3 A 170/22
Kolumbien: Hinreichender interner Schutz vor Kriminalität
Dabei bedarf es keiner Entscheidung, ob in Teilen Kolumbiens zurzeit noch ein bewaffneter innerstaatlicher Konflikt herrscht (verneinend OVG Lüneburg, Beschlüsse vom 08.11.2021 -11 LA 345/21- und vom 15.09.2021 -11 LA 196/21-; VG Oldenburg, Urteil vom 28.09.2021 -13 A 143/21 und VG Osnabrück, Urteil vom 16. April 2020 - 5 A 20/20 - jeweils n. v.) und der Kläger infolge willkürlicher Gewalt einer ernsthaften individuellen Bedrohung seines Lebens oder seiner Unversehrtheit ausgesetzt wäre. - VG Göttingen, 29.06.2022 - 3 A 125/20
Kolumbien: Kein internationaler Schutz bei Bedrohung durch Rebellen; Interner …
Dabei bedarf es keiner Entscheidung, ob in Teilen Kolumbiens zur zeit noch oder wieder ein bewaffneter innerstaatlicher Konflikt herrscht (verneinend OVG Lüneburg, Beschlüsse vom 08.11.2021 -11 LA 345/21- und vom 15.09.2021 -11 LA 196/21-; VG Oldenburg, Urteil vom 28.09.2021 -13 A 143/21 und VG Osnabrück, Urteil vom 16. April 2020 - 5 A 20/20 - jeweils n. v.) und die Kläger infolge willkürlicher Gewalt einer ernsthaften individuellen Bedrohung ihres Lebens oder ihrer Unversehrt heit ausgesetzt wären.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".