Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 30054/96
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

Wird zitiert von ... (38)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom (no. 24746/94), McKerr v. the United Kingdom (no. 28883/95) and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom (no. 37715/97).

  The inquests were further adjourned pending the outcome of proceedings relating to the inquests into the deaths of Gervaise McKerr, Eugene Toman and Sean Burns (see application no. 28883/95 brought by Jonathan McKerr).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94

  CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  In the previous case of Caraher v. the United Kingdom, (no. 24520/94, decision [Section 3] 11.01.00), where the applicant accepted a settlement of her action in respect of the killing of her husband by two soldiers, the Court did not find that the civil proceedings had been shown to be ineffective as a means of redress for the applicant's complaints.

  These civil proceedings are wholly independent of any criminal investigation and their efficacy has not been shown to rely on the proper conduct of criminal investigations or prosecutions (see e.g. Caraher v. the United Kingdom, no. 24520/94, decision of inadmissibility [Section 3] 11.01.00).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom (no. 24746/94), McKerr v. the United Kingdom (no. 28883/95) and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom (no. 37715/97).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom (no. 24746/94), McKerr v. the United Kingdom (no. 28883/95) and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom (no. 37715/97).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yaşa v. Turkey judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 2439-2440, §§ 102-104; Cakıcı v. Turkey cited above, §§ 80, 87 and 106; Tanrikulu v. Turkey, cited above, § 109; Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, [Section I] ECHR 2000-III, §§ 106-107).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia eye witness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see concerning autopsies, e.g. Salman v. Turkey cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses e.g. Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 199-IV, § 109; concerning forensic evidence e.g. Gül v. Turkey, 22676/93, [Section 4], § 89).
• EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

  GÜL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia eye witness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see concerning autopsies, e.g. Salman v. Turkey cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses e.g. Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 199-IV, § 109; concerning forensic evidence e.g. Gül v. Turkey, 22676/93, [Section 4], § 89).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC] no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII, § 100, and also Çakıcı v. Turkey, [GC] ECHR 1999- IV, § 85, Ertak v. Turkey no. 20764/92 [Section 1] ECHR 2000-V, § 32 and Timurtaş v. Turkey, no; 23531/94 [Section 1] ECHR 2000-VI, § 82).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.05.2014 - 49278/09

  "Herr Doktor from Germany" ist in Großbritannien nicht mehr so gerne gesehen

  Der Gerichtshof wiederholt in diesem Zusammenhang, dass er in früheren Entscheidungen, die die Verantwortlichkeit staatlicher Amtsträger im Zusammenhang mit Todesfällen betrafen, festgestellt hat, dass nach Artikel 2 Abs. 1 bei der behördlichen Untersuchung der zugrunde liegenden Ereignisse "die nächsten Angehörigen des Opfers in dem zur Wahrung ihrer rechtmäßigen Interessen erforderlichen Umfang in den Prozess einzubinden" sind (…siehe Hugh Jordan./. das Vereinigte Königreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24746/94, Rdnr. 109, ECHR 2001-III (Auszüge); und Kelly u. a../. das Vereinigte Königreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30054/96, Rdnr. 98, 4.
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
  Il est à noter toutefois que dans l'affaire McCann et autres l'enquête judiciaire était à certains égards exceptionnelle en regard des procédures mises en œuvre en Irlande du Nord dans un certain nombre d'affaires (voir également les arrêts du 4 mai 2001 dans les affaires Hugh Jordan c. Royaume-Uni, no 24746/94, Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, et Shanaghan c. Royaume-Uni, no 37715/97).

  Or tel n'est pas le cas [Note du greffe: des passages similaires figurent dans les arrêts Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni et Shanaghan c. Royaume-Uni (nos 30054/96 et 37715/97, 4 mai 2001).].

  Extraits de l'arrêt Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, 4 mai 2001.

• EGMR, 20.11.2014 - 47708/08

  [ENG]

  La force utilisée doit en particulier être strictement proportionnée aux buts mentionnés au paragraphe 2 a), b) et c) de l'article 2 (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, McCann et autres c. Royaume-Uni, 27 septembre 1995, § 149, série A no 324, Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, § 93, 4 mai 2001, et Issaïeva c. Russie, no 57950/00, § 173, 24 février 2005).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Having consulted the parties, the President of the Chamber decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the proceedings in the present case should be conducted simultaneously with those in the cases of McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97 (see judgments of the same date).

  However it must be noted that the inquest in that case was to some extent exceptional when compared with the proceedings in a number of cases in Northern Ireland (see also the cases of McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, and Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97).

• EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12

  Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter

  This was a situation that, as in Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 30054/96, § 118, 4 May 2001)... "cried out for an explanation" and Romania had an ongoing duty to conduct an effective investigation into this case.
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 38455/06

  [FRE]

  Cela suppose non seulement l'absence de tout lien hiérarchique ou institutionnel, mais également une indépendance pratique (voir, par exemple, l'arrêt Ergı c. Turquie du 28 juillet 1998, §§ 83-84, Recueil 1998-IV, et Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, § 114, 4 mai 2001).
• EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 28864/18

  GRIBBEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Relevant Committee of Ministers Resolutions 93. In addition to its earlier judgment in the present case (McCaughey and Others, cited above), the Court has adopted seven other judgments concerning the investigation of killings by security forces in Northern Ireland between 1968 and 1998 (see Hugh Jordan, cited above; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, 4 May 2001; Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, 4 May 2001; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, 28 May 2002; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Hemsworth v. the United Kingdom, no. 58559/09, 16 July 2013).

  In this regard the applicant submitted that in respect of the police investigation, the decision of the DPP not to prosecute and the civil proceedings (see McCaughey and Others, cited above, § 45), there were strong parallels between the present case and that of Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 30054/96, 4 May 2001) and consequently there was no basis on which the Court could depart from its conclusions in that case.

• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09

  [ENG]

  On 7 June 2001 the Coroner opened a pre-inquest hearing, in 16 cases including into John Hemsworth's death, to hear submissions on the implications of the judgments of this Court of 4 May 2001 in certain cases concerning deaths in Northern Ireland (Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, (extracts); McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, both in ECHR 2001-III; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97; and Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96).

  This premise seems to have little support in the Court's position in hundreds of other cases, where the Court held that "any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required standard of effectiveness" (see, among many other authorities, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, §§ 96-97, 4 May 2001; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 139, ECHR 2002-IV; and Mojsiejew v. Poland, no. 11818/02, 24 March 2009).

• EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99

  KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA

  The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004).
• EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 32444/96

  KANLIBAS c. TURQUIE

  Les membres de la famille du défunt ont donc dû éprouver de la frustration, de la détresse et de l'angoisse ; il y a eu de ce fait un préjudice moral certain que le constat de violation de la Convention ne suffit pas à compenser (voir, mutatis mutandis, Hugh Jordan c. Royaume-Uni, no 24746/94, §§ 169-171, CEDH 2001-III, Kelly et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 30054/96, § 164, CEDH 2001-III, et McKerr c. Royaume-Uni, no 28883/95, §§ 180-181, CEDH 2001-III).
• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 46430/99

  BARBU ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95

  FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 23954/94

  AKDENIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94

  CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 43629/13

  ANAMARIA-LOREDANA ORASANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 23038/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 49234/99

  POPESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 34160/09

  DOBRE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 28290/95

  GÜNGÖR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 35152/09

  DALAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 47357/08

  ALIKAJ ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 12.10.2004 - 42066/98

  BURSUC c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 43626/13

  ECATERINA MIREA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 26246/05

  IORGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 74832/01

  MIZIGÁROVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 10778/02

  NITA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  ANIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 75527/01

  UCAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 43247/02

  MELINTE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 10425/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56838/08

  ALECU c. ROUMANIE et 121 autres affaires
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 1062/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00

  HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 32597/96

  HALIT DINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01

  EKREM c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 40073/98

  IHSAN BILGIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 68694/01

  GÜVEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY