Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 09.10.2018

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,7
EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.01.2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Januar 2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,7) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    FRUMKIN v. RUSSIA

    Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

  • lto.de (Kurzinformation)

    Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (459)Zitiert selbst (38)

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    In cases featuring a continuing situation, the six-month period runs from the cessation of that situation (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 72, 10 January 2012, with further references).
  • EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The failure to do so ran contrary to the fundamental principles of criminal law, namely, in dubio pro reo (see, mutatis mutandis, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 125, 28 November 2002; Melich and Beck v. the Czech Republic, no. 35450/04, § 49, 24 July 2008; and Nemtsov, cited above, § 92).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2002 - 58442/00

    LAVENTS c. LETTONIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The failure to do so ran contrary to the fundamental principles of criminal law, namely, in dubio pro reo (see, mutatis mutandis, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 125, 28 November 2002; Melich and Beck v. the Czech Republic, no. 35450/04, § 49, 24 July 2008; and Nemtsov, cited above, § 92).
  • EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 56926/18

    LAKHATKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016, concerning examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the Code of Administrative Offences, Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations, Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013 and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of public assemblies).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

    Detention as an administrative suspect after the offence record had been compiled, until the hearing before the first instance court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 149-52, 5 January 2016, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

    11 (2) -disproportionate measures against participants of public assemblies (see Kasparov and Others, cited above, §§ 84-97, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

  • EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

    Nawalny-Demos auch ohne Erlaubnis

    In the absence of any explicit reasons for not releasing the applicant, the Court considered the detention pending trial unjustified and arbitrary even though it fell within the forty-eight-hour time-limit provided for by Article 27.5 § 3 of the Code of Administrative Offences (see Navalnyy and Yashin, cited above, § 96, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, § 150, 5 January 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 27990/18

    SOLOVEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against organisers and participants of public assemblies; Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7 February 2017, concerning restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, concerning examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the Federal Code of Administrative Offences).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - disproportionate measures taken against the applicants as participants of peaceful assembly, namely the applicants' administrative arrest and conviction for having participated in an unauthorised public event (Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 93-142, 5 January 2016; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 49-75,.

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - disproportionate measures taken against the applicants as participants of peaceful assembly, namely the applicants' administrative arrest and conviction for having participated in an unauthorised public event (Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 93-142, 5 January 2016; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 49-75, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no 21613/07, §§ 82-97, 3 October 2013).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - disproportionate measures taken against the applicants as participants of peaceful assembly, namely the applicants' administrative arrest and conviction for having participated in an unauthorised public event (Frumkin v. Russia, no.74568/12, §§ 93-142, 5 January 2016; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 49-75, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 82-97, 3 October 2013).

    11 (2) - disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies - disproportionate measures taken against the applicants as participants of peaceful assembly, namely the applicants' administrative arrest and conviction for having participated in an unauthorised public event (Frumkin v. Russia, no.74568/12, §§ 93-142, 5 January 2016; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 49-75, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 82-97, 3 October 2013).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12, 5438/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,31698
EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12, 5438/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,31698)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.10.2018 - 76191/12, 5438/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,31698)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Oktober 2018 - 76191/12, 5438/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,31698)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,31698) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ARISTOV AND GROMOV v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial ...

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 15.05.2014 - 19554/05

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    Moreover, other acts imputed to him included chanting anti-government slogans, which were peaceful and constituted protest, a form of expression protected by Article 10 of the Convention (see Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554/05, § 70, 15 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 31475/10

    ANNENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    In the absence of adequate examination of the relevant factual and legal elements of the case on their part, the domestic courts cannot be said to have "applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 11" (see Annenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 31475/10, § 139 and the cases cited therein, 25 July 2017).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

    KARELIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    Their submissions in that connection were similar to those made in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 45-48, 20 September 2016).
  • EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12

    Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    The background facts relating to the planning, conduct and dispersal of the demonstration at Bolotnaya Square are set out in more detail in Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, §§ 7-65, 5 January 2016), and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia (nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 7-33, 4 October 2016).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11

    NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    In the absence of any explicit reasons given by the authorities for not releasing the applicants, the Court considers that their administrative arrest for fourteen hours was unjustified and arbitrary (see, for similar reasoning, Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 96, 4 December 2014).
  • EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    The Court considers that given the dispute over the key facts underlying the charge, where the only evidence against the applicant came from the police officers who had played an active role in the contested events, it was indispensable for the courts to use every reasonable opportunity to check their incriminating statements (see Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, § 64, 3 October 2013).
  • EGMR, 19.11.2015 - 46998/08

    MIKHAYLOVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    The Court has previously found that Article 6 of the Convention was applicable under its criminal limb to proceedings involving charges under Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offences punishable by a fine or administrative detention (see Frumkin, cited above, § 155; Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 71-74, 19 November 2015; Navalnyy and Yashin, cited above, § 78; and Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, § 83, 31 July 2014).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 25501/07

    NOVIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    Even though the Government have not argued that in each applicant's case this was impossible, the Court is ready to accept that in the context of the general commotion and violence which was happening at Bolotnaya Square, the police could hardly draw up the records on the spot (contrast Novikova and Others, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 182-83, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13

    YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    The background facts relating to the planning, conduct and dispersal of the demonstration at Bolotnaya Square are set out in more detail in Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, §§ 7-65, 5 January 2016), and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia (nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 7-33, 4 October 2016).
  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 76191/12
    The Court has previously found that Article 6 of the Convention was applicable under its criminal limb to proceedings involving charges under Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offences punishable by a fine or administrative detention (see Frumkin, cited above, § 155; Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 71-74, 19 November 2015; Navalnyy and Yashin, cited above, § 78; and Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, § 83, 31 July 2014).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

    ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA

    In several related cases it found that the applicants' arrest at the site of the venue had violated Article 11 of the Convention (ibid., §§ 138-40; see also Aristov and Gromov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 76191/12 and 5438/13, §§ 58-62, 9 October 2018; Asainov and Sibiryak v. Russia [Committee], nos.
  • EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 56109/13

    KAPUSTINA v. RUSSIA

    76191/12 and 5438/13, §§ 23, 40 and 63, 9 October 2018).
  • EGMR, 28.02.2023 - 13387/21

    RIESTRA GONZALEZ DE UBIETA c. ANDORRE

    En l'espèce, il ressort des décisions judiciaires que le maintien du requérant en détention poursuivait le double objectif de permettre au requérant de déposer en pleine possession de ses facultés volitives et intellectuelles et à la police d'effectuer, avec toutes les garanties du procès équitable, des démarches procédurales tendant à la découverte de la vérité (comparer avec Zelčs, précité, § 54 in fine ; Zinovyeva c. Russie [comité], no 69272/13, § 40, 8 janvier 2019 ; et Aristov et Gromov c. Russie [comité], nos 76191/12 et 5438/13, § 33, 9 octobre 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht