Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KERECHASHVILI v. GEORGIA [Extracts]
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (174) Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01
REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Rehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004).
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11
Burka-Verbot: In Würde verschleiert
First, in the case of applications which were knowingly based on untrue facts (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X), whether there had been falsification of documents in the file (see, for example, Jian v. Romania (dec.), no. 46640/99, 30 March 2004) or failure to inform the Court of an essential item of evidence for its examination of the case (see, for example, Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 89, 20 June 2002, and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006) or of new major developments in the course of the proceedings (see, for example, Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008). - EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 36862/05
[FRE]
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, and Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see Bekauri v. Georgia (preliminary objection), no. 14102/02, §§ 21 and 24, 10 April 2012, and Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006). - EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 75909/01
Sud Fondi S.r.l. u.a. ./. Italien
La Cour rappelle enfin qu'une requête peut être rejetée comme étant abusive si elle a été fondée sciemment sur des faits erronés (voir, entre autres, Kérétchavili c. Géorgie, no 5667/02, 2 mai 2006 ; Varbanov c. Bulgarie, no 31365/96, § 37, CEDH 2000-X ; Akdivar et autres c. Turquie, 16 septembre 1996, §§ 53-54, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-IV ; Rehàk c. République tchèque (déc.), no 67208/01, 18 mai 2004), en vue d'induire délibérément la Cour en erreur (Assenov et autres c. Bulgarie, décision de la Commission, no 24760/94, 27 juin 1996 ; Varbanov c. Bulgarie, no 31365/96, § 36, CEDH 2000-X).
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 20319/17
BALSAMO v. SAN MARINO et 1 autre affaire
The Court reiterates that under Article 35 § 3 (a) an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004; Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005; Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V; Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798/05, § 63, 15 September 2009; and Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 97, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 67810/10
GROSS c. SUISSE
The Court reiterates that under this provision an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Rehak v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004; Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005; Kérétchachvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006; Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798/05, § 63, 15 September 2009; and Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 97, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 03.07.2007 - 25101/05
M. P. u. a. gegen Deutschland
Was die Folgen solchen Verhaltens angeht, weist der Gerichtshof erneut darauf hin, dass eine Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs nach Artikel 35 Abs. 3 der Konvention abgewiesen werden kann, wenn sie sich bewusst auf falsche Tatsachen stützt (siehe u.a. Akdivar u.a. ./. Türkei , Urteil vom 16. September 1996, Urteils- und Entscheidungssammlung 1996-IV, S. 1206, Randnr. 53-54; Kérétchachvili ./. Georgien (Entsch.), Nr. 5667/02, 2. Mai 2006) oder wenn dem Gerichtshof gegenüber unvollständige und damit irreführende Angaben gemacht wurden (siehe Hüttner ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Nr. 23130/04, 9. Juni 2006). - EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 23130/04
Menschenrechtskonvention : Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs des …
Januar 2005; Rehak ./. Tschechische Republik (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 67208/01, 18. Mai 2004; Kérétchachvili ./. Georgien (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 5667/02, 2. Mai 2006). - EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 8967/14
ABDURZAKOV v. RUSSIA
Se référant, entre autres, aux décisions Kérétchachvili c. Géorgie ((déc.), no 5667/02, 2 mai 2006) et Sarmin et Sarmina c. Russie, ((déc.), no 58830/00, 22 novembre 2005), le Gouvernement indique que la requérante n'a pas tenu la Cour informée de nouveaux développements dans sa requête, à savoir les informations relatives à la réintroduction d'une demande, le 14 mai 2015, auprès du tribunal du district Dzerjinski de Saint-Pétersbourg.« 28. La Cour rappelle qu'en vertu de cette disposition une requête peut être déclarée abusive notamment si elle se fonde délibérément sur des faits controuvés (Akdivar et autres c. Turquie [GC], 16 septembre 1996, §§ 53-54, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-IV, Varbanov c. Bulgarie, no 31365/96, § 36, CEDH 2000-X, Rehak c. République tchèque (déc.), no 67208/01, 18 mai 2004, Popov c. Moldova (no 1), no 74153/01, § 48, 18 janvier 2005, Kérétchachvili c. Géorgie (déc.), no 5667/02, 2 mai 2006, Miroļubovs et autres c. Lettonie, no 798/05, § 63, 15 septembre 2009, et Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. et Di Stefano c. Italie [GC], no 38433/09, § 97, CEDH 2012).
- EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 66357/14
PODESCHI v. SAN MARINO
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among others, Jian v. Romania (dec.), no. 46640/99, and Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see, among others, Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Basileo v. Italy (dec.), no. 11303/02, 23 August 2011). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03
PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE
Elle rappelle ensuite qu'une requête peut être rejetée comme étant abusive, au sens de l'article 35 § 3 de la Convention, si elle a été fondée sciemment sur des faits controuvés (Varbanov c. Bulgarie, 5 octobre 2000, § 36, Recueil des arrêt et décisions 2000-X ; Rehák c. République tchèque (déc.), no 67208/01, 18 mai 2004 ; Popov c. Moldavie (no 1), no 74153/01, § 48, 18 janvier 2005 ; Kérétchachvili c. Géorgie (déc.), no 5667/02, 2 mai 2006). - EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 33636/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 38270/11
SENER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 14102/02
[FRE]
- EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02
HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 29.08.2024 - 24622/22
PASQUINELLI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
- EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 67618/09
STEVANCEVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 19.02.2019 - 25253/08
RUSEN BAYAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.01.2016 - 39380/13
VRTAR v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 28609/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 510/07
PREOBRAZOVATEL-SERVIS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 6232/20
Micheil Saakaschwili
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 75381/10
KOMATINOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 5312/11
BEG S.P.A. v. ITALY
- EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 43629/13
ANAMARIA-LOREDANA ORASANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 45394/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 14717/04
BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10
RANÐELOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 36629/10
SABA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 2912/11
KOWAL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 55349/07
BUREA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 12674/07
VARTIC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 30164/06
BAGHERI AND MALIKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 44394/15
G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 30044/10
DIMOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 50930/11
CAVALIERE c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 21455/10
BOUSIOU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 14758/08
SIVOGRAK AND ZENOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 50914/11
SIMONETTI (II) c. ITALIE ET SIMONETTI (III) c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 57242/13
BELOSEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 6314/09
[FRE]
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 30464/07
DE CRISTOFARO v. ITALY AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
- EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 19057/02
DOSTAL c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 55517/14
VILCHES CORONADO ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 70026/10
BEKTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2013 - 58511/13
MIGLIORE ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 03.12.2013 - 27804/10
BULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 11303/02
BASILEO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 26446/06
KHVICHIA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2026 - 9840/24
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 57699/13
AKSENTIJEVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 57077/16
RALUCA IONESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 64659/11
MAKRADULI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and 1 other application
- EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 37226/13
MECIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 80529/13
EZE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 57675/10
BESTRY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 24652/09
STOJNIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 26216/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 20.05.2025 - 23550/22
BILGIN ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 10.12.2024 - 35922/20
KARADENIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 81624/17
POVILONIS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 21371/10
YAVUZ ÖZDEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13
MINDEK v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 16680/14
PE?‡ARANDA SOTO v. MALTA
- EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 9602/15
BENCHEREF v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
VELCHEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 26.05.2015 - 35044/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 56297/11
MARTINS ALVES v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 67648/10
PUUSEP v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 43892/04
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 26852/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 44328/05
PIRTSKHALAISHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 10911/05
PANCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.01.2026 - 37144/23
TARMELIT c. FRANCE et 16 autres affaires
- EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 24085/11
DE VINCENZO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 13.09.2022 - 11972/16
TURCEAC AND CERCHEZ v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 56335/10
KOVALEVA v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 45340/18
ÖZYÜREK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 36363/18
ARSLANBAS v. TURKEY and 16 other applications
- EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 16627/10
MASLOTSOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 8294/15
ISTRATOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 292/18
TISKEVICIUS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 20587/13
TRACZ-SMOCZY?ƒSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.09.2019 - 53661/13
MARKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 34929/16
BIHORAC HAJDARAGIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14099/15
KALTAK v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 52142/12
MITROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2016 - 24902/11
CABALLERO RAMIREZ c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 18589/11
[ENG]
- EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 80131/12
STANKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 27921/07
SINDICATUL LIBER SOLECTRON v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 33172/05
[FRE]
- EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 36438/08
BAZA DE TRANSPORT AUTO NR. 1 c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 17544/07
JAKOB'S CENTER D.O.O. v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 53155/12
MARJANOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 61197/13
BARBATO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 41816/10
F.A. v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 07.03.2014 - 40348/08
JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 6811/08
STOG ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.03.2009 - 10731/05
J. B. ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 33052/05
LOZINSCHI v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.07.2008 - 34640/02
RAHMANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
GEORGIAN LABOUR PARTY v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2025 - 32824/23
FONDS ANTICORRUPTION c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 27122/21
KANKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 18428/18
DUMITRU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 8968/14
BRD - GROUPE SOCIÄ-TÄ- GÄ-NÄ-RALE S.A. v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 12420/21
LOWÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 10.11.2021 - 55781/17
POSOKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 1157/12
LOBAREV AND VASILYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 11678/18
BELYKH c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 36673/11
FORESTA-FORT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 19.11.2018 - 56729/12
SHILOVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 7090/12
PETROPOULAKOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 40738/10
[ENG]
- EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 55506/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 48747/09
LISNIC NICOLAE & CO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 3230/14
COSTA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 4831/09
GORODNYK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 3822/10
MINE-PROJEKT DOO v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 11399/16
DANESE ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 34194/09
PULIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 24463/11
DIMOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 44291/15
RINALDI ET CANNOVA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.09.2015 - 62335/10
MICHEV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 15767/12
VESELINOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 45928/08
DURDEVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 80775/12
STOJKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 63649/13
CVETKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49961/12
ATANASIJEVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 57960/11
VOROZHBA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 14608/11
CIOGESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 61970/09
SZILVESZTER c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 2228/04
VLAD BELLAMY v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 25787/04
GARDEAN ET S.C. GRUP 95 S.A. c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 35678/02
MOLLACCO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 3834/10
PECHONKA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 8236/11
MICHALUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04
BAISUEV AND ANZOROV v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 11122/10
[FRE]
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 15433/07
TATALOVIC AND DEKIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 56022/10
[FRE]
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 36773/02
RUBECA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 51721/09
DRIJFHOUT v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 13272/07
STRELTOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 16282/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 52330/07
CIR c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 9332/02
LAZARESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 33605/03
CONSTANTINESCU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 7932/03
JGARKAVA c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 53502/19
MOGLAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 64232/16
NISEVIC TADIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 23603/14
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 19978/14
PAVLOVIC AND PANTOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 414/11
KONGRESNA NARODNA STRANKA AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 18545/10
KOLICIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 56080/10
SHANIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 57771/10
MARINKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 30073/06
HANZL ET SPADRNA c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 11410/02
CAIAZZO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 35544/02
NOTARO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 73715/01
KUTLULAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2023 - 458/19
CIORNEI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 15198/17
BESKRYLA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 33104/16
MATOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
MARTINOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 9257/11
PYTEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 34176/10
METALEX DOO v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 54337/10
KRYZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 73485/01
VASILEVSKIY c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 15719/03
MEHMET CEVHER ILHAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 55952/13
GÜLER AND KEKEC v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 18859/12
RADOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 59364/11
[ENG]
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".