Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06, 4271/06, 26591/08, 30466/08, 39383/08, 55234/08, 547/09, 2619/09, 24515/10, 47544/10, 66215/10, 35080/11, 879/13, 17322/13, 17325/13, 38376/16, 43794/16, 44927/16, 45053/16, 45222/16, 46445/16, 47874/16, 48034/16, 48038/16, 48040/16, 31067/17, 40 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 4261/06
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06, 4271/06, 26591/08, 30466/08, 39383/08, 55234/08, 547/09, 2619/09, 24515/10, 47544/10, 66215/10, 35080/11, 879/13, 17322/13, 17325/13, 38376/16, 43794/16, 44927/16, 45053/16, 45222/16, 46445/16, 47874/16, 48034/16, 48038/16, 48040/16, 31067/17, 40
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (51)
- EGMR - 39383/08 (anhängig)
AKHKUBEKOV v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11) and Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16) were convicted on the basis of, among other evidence, their confession statements and statements incriminating each other.In view of the severity of the ill-treatment supported by medical evidence and its consequences for the applicants' health, Mr Kudayev (no. 4261/06), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 4271/06), Mr Khamukov (no. 26591/08), Mr Malyshev (no. 547/09) and Mr Mashukov (no. 24515/10) were subjected to torture, and Mr Mironov and Ms Yerizhokova (no. 30466/08), Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Kashirgov (no. 55234/08), Mr Khubolov (no. 2619/09), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13) and Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13) were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, as alleged by them.
The applicants Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13), Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16), Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16), Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16), Mr Khamukov (no. 47874/16), Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 48038/16), Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) and Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16) complained that their conviction had been based on their confession statements and incriminating statements of their co-defendants obtained under duress, which had rendered their trial unfair.
The Government argued that applicants Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11) and Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) had not appealed against the judgment of 23 December 2014 and thus failed to exhaust domestic remedies.
In the present case the Court has already found that applicants Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13), Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13), Mr Khamukov (no. 47874/16), Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 48038/16), Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) and Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16) were subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment (see paragraph 77 above), as a result of which they gave confession statements used for their conviction.
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in respect of Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13), Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16), Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16), Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16), Mr Khamukov (no. 47874/16), Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 48038/16), Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) and Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16).
Dismisses the Government's non-exhaustion objection in respect of complaints of Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11) and Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) under Article 6 of the Convention;.
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in that Mr Kudayev (no. 4261/06), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 4271/06), Mr Khamukov (no. 26591/08), Mr Malyshev (no. 547/09) and Mr Mashukov (no. 24515/10) were subjected to torture, and Mr Mironov and Ms Yerizhokova (no. 30466/08), Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Kashirgov (no. 55234/08), Mr Khubolov (no. 2619/09), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13) and Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13) were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, and that no effective investigation into their complaints was carried out;.
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in respect of Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11), Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13), Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16), Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16), Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16), Mr Khamukov (no. 47874/16), Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 48038/16), Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) and Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16);.
39383/08.
35080/11.
(no. 39383/08).
(no. 35080/11).
(no. 39383/08).
(no. 35080/11).
- KAG Mainz, 03.11.2011 - M 17/11
Beteiligung bei Versetzung
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Arrested at 6 a.m. on 17/11/2005 at his house, taken to the Centre "T".First complaint of 17/11/2005 First refusal of 27/01/2006.
Arrested on 17/11/2005 at home, taken to the Centre "T" in Nalchik.
11/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 18/11/2005, 09/12/2005.
M.So. (17/11/2005, 24/11/2005, 13/12/2005, 30/12/2005, 24/05/2006).
11/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 18/11/2005, 08/12/2005, 29/12/2005.
Dzh.Na. (17/11/2005, 15/12/2005).
17/11/2005, 18/11/2005, 19/11/2005, 20/11/2005, 24/11/2005, 06/12/2005, 23/03/2006, 01/06/2006.
Applicant Kashirgov (17/11/2005, 06/12/2005, 19/12/2005, 24/05/2006).
R.Sh. (24/10/2005, 27/10/2005, 17/11/2005, 15/12/2005, 24/04/2006).
03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 09/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 16/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 27/12/2005, 12/01/2006, 02/02/2006, 13/03/2006, 12/11/2006.
(03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 12/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 01/12/2005, 09/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 13/03/2006).
23/10/2005, 02/11/2005, 09/11/2005, 16/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 02/12/2005.
- KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11
Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Arrested on 12/11/2005 in his own house by of the UBOP department no. 6.Apprehended on 12/11/2005 at her house by police officers.
(refusal quashed as unfounded) the KBR Supreme Court, decision of 12/11/2010.
Z.Er. (14/10/2005, 25/10/2005, 11-12/11/2005, 25/11/2005, 13/12/2005, 18/02/2006).
14/10/2005, 12/11/2005, 13/11/2005, 16/11/2005.
12/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 13/12/2005, 15/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 24/12/2005, 26/12/2005, 19/01/2006, 01/02/2006, 18/02/2006.
03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 09/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 16/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 27/12/2005, 12/01/2006, 02/02/2006, 13/03/2006, 12/11/2006.
(03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 12/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 01/12/2005, 09/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 13/03/2006).
- SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
First complaint lodged of 15/12/2005.Z.To. 14/10/2005, 26/10/2005, 02/11/2005, 13/11/2005, 15/12/2005, 18/03/2006,.
Dzh.Na. (17/11/2005, 15/12/2005).
R.Sh. (24/10/2005, 27/10/2005, 17/11/2005, 15/12/2005, 24/04/2006).
FMEA no. 1730-A of 07/12/2005 and no.1820-A of 15/12/2005,.
A.Za. (28/10/2005, 16/11/2005, 15/12/2005, 17/03/2006).
A.Un. (12/10/2005, 18/11/2005, 21/11/2005, 07/12/2005, 15/12/2005, 25/01/2006, 14/03/2006).
12/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 13/12/2005, 15/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 24/12/2005, 26/12/2005, 19/01/2006, 01/02/2006, 18/02/2006.
- EGMR - 47544/10 (anhängig)
URUSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
The applicants were also incriminated by applicant Urusov (no. 47544/10) and co-defendants A.B., R.Sh., S.B.They did not raise this objection in respect of Mr Urusov (no. 47544/10), Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16) and Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16).
The Court finds the complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning alleged ill-treatment of Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Urusov (no. 47544/10), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16), Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16) and Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16) inadmissible for the failure to comply with the six-month time-limit and rejects them in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.
Declares inadmissible the complaints of Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Urusov (no. 47544/10), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16) and Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16) Mr Khupsirgenov (no. 45222/16) and Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16) under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged ill-treatment; the complaint of Mr Kudayev (no. 4261/06) concerning the lack of medical care in detention; the complaint of Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 40436/18) concerning handcuffing; the complaints in applications Kuchmenova and Others v. Russia (no. 20559/19) and Kugotova and Others v. Russia (no. 26399/19) under Article 8 of the Convention concerning remote detention; and the remainder of the applications admissible;.
47544/10.
(no. 47544/10).
- VerfGH Berlin, 20.12.2011 - VerfGH 28/11
Verfassungsbeschwerde: Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz iSv …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Arrested on 29/11/2005 by the UBOP.21/10/2005, 23/10/2005, 29/11/2005, 23/12/2005, 10/02/2006, 26/02/2006, 02/03/2006, 09/03/2006.
K.At. (28/10/2005, 25/11/2005, 29/11/2005, 14/03/2006).
R.No. (24/10/2005, 14/11/2005, 29/11/2005, 21/02/2006).
A.Ku. (26/10/2005, 29/10/2005, 31/10/2005, 01/11/2005, 11/11/2005, 18/11/2005, 23/11/2005, 29/11/2005, 05/12/2005, 06/12/2005).
- BGH, 22.12.2011 - AK 22/11
Fortdauer der Untersuchungshaft über sechs Monate hinaus (dringender Tatverdacht; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Forensic medical examination act no. 1688-A of 23/11/2005 (hematomas on the limbs, chest, face, inflicted by hard blunt objects within one day prior to the examination).Forensic medical examination act no. 1687-A of 23/11/2005 (compound wound on the head, hematomas on his face, both arms and legs, chest, abrasions on his right arm and left leg, inflicted by hard blunt objects).
23/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 06/12/2005.
27/10/2005, 18/11/2005, 23/11/2005, 07/04/2006.
A.Ku. (26/10/2005, 29/10/2005, 31/10/2005, 01/11/2005, 11/11/2005, 18/11/2005, 23/11/2005, 29/11/2005, 05/12/2005, 06/12/2005).
- KAGH, 05.07.2013 - K 24/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
24/12/2012.09/05/2008, 12/07/2010, 24/12/2011.
Refusals of 06/09/2006, 19/11/2007, 26/11/2007, 03/01/2008, 31/03/2008, 09/05/2008, 22/05/2008, 02/06/2008 and 11/06/2008, 24/12/2011.
12/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 13/12/2005, 15/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 24/12/2005, 26/12/2005, 19/01/2006, 01/02/2006, 18/02/2006.
Z.So. (09/12/2005, 14/12/2005, 24/12/2005, 17/01/2006, 21/02/2006).
- KAG Mainz, 12.01.2012 - M 28/11
"Einkehrtag" als beteiligungspflichtige Veranstaltung
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
R.Kh. (13/11/2005, 21/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 22/12/2005, 18/03/2006, 15/03/2006).23/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 06/12/2005.
(03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 12/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 01/12/2005, 09/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 13/03/2006).
23/10/2005, 02/11/2005, 09/11/2005, 16/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 28/11/2005, 02/12/2005.
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.06.2012 - 10/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06
Forensic medical examination act no. 1783-A of 10/12/2005 (hematoma on the chest, abrasion on the lip, contusion of the soft tissues and abrasions on the legs inflicted by hard blunt objects within 1-3 days prior to the examination).12/11/2005, 22/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 13/12/2005, 15/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 24/12/2005, 26/12/2005, 19/01/2006, 01/02/2006, 18/02/2006.
03/11/2005, 07/11/2005, 09/11/2005, 17/11/2005, 10/12/2005, 16/12/2005, 20/12/2005, 27/12/2005, 12/01/2006, 02/02/2006, 13/03/2006, 12/11/2006.
FMEA no. 1784-A of 10/12/2005,.
- EGMR - 26591/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR - 24515/10 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 24/11
CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. c. ITALIE
- VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11
Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 06.11.2012 - 13/11
- KAG Mainz, 11.12.2012 - M 29/12
Stufenzuordnung
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03
VANZHULA v. RUSSIA
- BVerfG, 23.06.2015 - 1 BvL 13/11
Ersatzbemessungsgrundlage im Grunderwerbsteuerrecht verfassungswidrig
- VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10
Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
- KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
- KAG Mainz, 25.11.2010 - M 29/10
Höhergruppierung
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11
LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02
Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …
- KAG Münster, 18.01.2007 - 10/06
Abschluss eines beamtenähnlichen Arbeitsvertrages; Ersetzung der Zustimmung der …
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09
[ENG]
- OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 24.10.2008 - 23/07
Anhörungsrüge wegen des Verstoßes einer Entscheidung gegen den Anspruch auf …
- VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04
- KAGH, 07.06.2013 - M 22/12
Zustimmung der MAV beim Einsatz von Dienstleistungskräften (Anästhesieteam) - zum …
- EGMR, 19.11.2015 - 17694/10
MAIO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09
Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …
- KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08
Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker
- EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 15/02
DURUK ET YÜCEDAG c. TURQUIE
- KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06
- KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 18/06
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.07.2007 - 15/04
- EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11
SHLYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01
BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06
KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 10825/09
OLISOV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
- EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 13642/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11
N.T. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06
BELUGIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 2082/05
CETINKAYA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 12102/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 36027/19
DADUSENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06
URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 18825/02
DMITRACHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 63748/13
PSHIBIYEV ET BEROV c. RUSSIE et 4 autres affaires
- EGMR - 39383/08 (anhängig)
AKHKUBEKOV v. RUSSIA and 20 other applications
The list of applicants is set out in Appendix No. 1. Mr Kashirgov (no. 55234/08), Mr Khubolov (no. 2619/09) and Mr Boziyev (no. 6658/09) are represented before the Court by lawyers of the Memorial Human Rights Centre, an NGO based in Moscow.Forensic medical experts recorded injuries of different type and severity on all applicants, except for Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13) and Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16) (see Appendix No. 2).
Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16), Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16), Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) and Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16) were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13) was convicted on the basis of, among other things, his confession statements, as well as incriminating statements of co-defendants Kh., Er. and Ul., who were allegedly ill-treated by the police.
Mr Mashukov (no. 38376/16), Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16) and Mr Khamukov (no. 47874/16) were convicted on the basis of, among other things, their confession statements and statements incriminating each other.
Mr Kashirgov (no. 55234/08), Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13), Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16) and Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16) were convicted on the basis of, among other things, their confession statements and statements incriminating each other.
Mr Malyshev (no. 547/09) was convicted on the basis of, among other things, incriminating statements of Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16) and Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16).
Mr Berov (no. 66215/10), Mr Pshibiyev (no. 48038/16), Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16) and Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13) were convicted on the basis of, among other things, their confession statements and statements incriminating each other.
Mr Mironov (no. 48040/16) was convicted on the basis of, among other things, his confession statements.
Mr Akhkubekov (no. 39383/08), Mr Khulamkhanov (no. 35080/11) and Mr Kudayev (no. 48034/16) were convicted on the basis of, among other things, their confession statements and statements incriminating each other.
Other relevant information Application no. 20559/19 was lodged by six applicants, Mr Bapinayev, Mr Mironov, Mr Aslan Kuchmenov, and their mothers, Ms Shavayeva, Ms Akhmetova and Ms Kuchmenova.
Mr Kashirgov (no. 55234/08),.
Mr Malyshev (no. 547/09),.
Mr Khubolov (no. 2619/09),.
Mr Berov (no. 66215/10),.
Mr Shavayev (no. 879/13),.
Mr Kelemetov (no. 17322/13),.
Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13),.
Mr Bapinayev (no. 43794/16),.
Mr Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16),.
Mr Aslan Kuchmenov (no. 45053/16),.
Mr Khakulov (no. 46445/16) complain that they had been ill-treated by State agents during the criminal proceedings against them and that the domestic authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation in this respect, and that they did not have effective remedy in respect of their grievances.
Under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention Ms Kuchmenova, Ms Akhmetova, Ms Shavayeva, Mr Aslan Kuchmenov, Mr Bapinayev and Mr Mironov (no. 20559/19) complain that the respective transfers of Mr Aslan Kuchmenov, Mr Murat Bapinayev and Mr Eduard Mironov to remote penitentiary facilities amount to breach of family ties between the detainees and their family members.
46445/16 Khakulov v. Russia.
66215/10 Berov v. Russia.
43794/16 Bapinayev v. Russia.
44927/16 Sokmyshev v. Russia.
45053/16 Aslan Kuchmenov v. Russia.
66215/10 Berov v. Russia.
46445/16 Khakulov v. Russia.
55234/08 Kashirgov v. Russia.
547/09 Malyshev v. Russia.
2619/09 Khubolov v. Russia.
66215/10 Berov v. Russia.
879/13 Shavayev v. Russia.
17322/13 Kelemetov v. Russia.
17325/13 Ruslan Kuchmenov v. Russia.
43794/16 Bapinayev v. Russia.
44927/16 Sokmyshev v. Russia.
45053/16 Aslan Kuchmenov v. Russia.
46445/16 Khakulov v. Russia.
Mr Albiyan Malyshev (no. 547/09),.
Mr Khusei Khubolov (no. 2619/09),.
Mr Aslan Berov (no. 66215/10),.
Mr Azret Shavayev (no. 879/13),.
Mr Ruslan Kuchmenov (no. 17325/13),.
Mr Zaur Sokmyshev (no. 44927/16).
The wife of deceased Mr Murat Kashirgov (no. 55234/08), Ms Rusana Kashirgova, who maintained the application, is requested to provide a copy of her passport (or any other national identity document) and a copy of the marriage certificate with Mr Murat Kashirgov.
The wife of deceased Mr Amur Khakulov (no. 46445/16), Ms Fatima Sonova, who maintained the application, is requested to provide a copy of her passport (or any other national identity document).
66215/10 Berov v. Russia.
879/13 Shavayev v. Russia.
17322/13 Kelemetov v. Russia.
17325/13 Ruslan Kuchmenov v. Russia.
43794/16 Bapinayev v. Russia.
44927/16 Sokmyshev v. Russia.
45053/16 Aslan Kuchmenov v. Russia.
46445/16 Khakulov v. Russia.
47874/16 Khamukov v. Russia.
48034/16 Kudayev v. Russia.
48038/16 Pshibiyev v. Russia.
48040/16 Mironov v. Russia.
38376/16 Mashukov v. Russia.
Application no. 20559/19, Kuchmenova and Others v. Russia.
55234/08.
547/09.
2619/09.
66215/10.
879/13.
17322/13.
17325/13.
38376/16.
43794/16.
44927/16.
45053/16.
46445/16.
47874/16.
48034/16.
48038/16.
48040/16.
20559/19.
Kashirgov v. Russia[2] 55234/08.
Malyshev v. Russia 547/09.
Khubolov v. Russia 2619/09.
Berov v. Russia 66215/10.
Shavayev v. Russia 879/13.
Kelemetov v. Russia 17322/13.
Kuchmenov v. Russia 17325/13.
Mashukov v. Russia 38376/16.
Bapinayev v. Russia 43794/16.
Sokmyshev v. Russia 44927/16.
Kuchmenov v. Russia 45053/16.
Khakulov v. Russia[3] 46445/16.
47874/16.
Kudayev v. Russia 48034/16.
For details, see Statement of Facts in the case of Kudayev and Others v. Russia, no. 4261/06, communicated on 3 November 2011.
Pshibiyev v. Russia 48038/16.
Mironov v. Russia 48040/16.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 40436/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, 34068/19, 38336/19 |
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Zitiert selbst (18)
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 71295/17
CHUDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
(a) Did the application of handcuffs to applicants (in all cases), using dogs to guard the applicants during their transportation (applications nos. 6725/18, 15031/18, 34068/19), separation of the life convicts from other prison population and their solitary confinement or placement in a cell holding no more than two persons (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18), forced shaving (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15294/18, 21401/18, 44351/18), constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts); Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, §§ 39-40, 20 January 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 151-63, 15 May 2012; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.78210/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, 34068/19, and 38336/19, did the applicants have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaints, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, and 38336/19, were the conditions of the applicants' detention and transport compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 46-58, 28 November 2013; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 64-81, 92-98, 6 March 2014; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, and 38336/19, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for the complaint about conditions of detention under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 93-119, and Sergey Babushkin, cited above, §§ 36-45)?.
71295/17.
78210/17.
21401/18.
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 21205/12
BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
(a) Did the application of handcuffs to applicants (in all cases), using dogs to guard the applicants during their transportation (applications nos. 6725/18, 15031/18, 34068/19), separation of the life convicts from other prison population and their solitary confinement or placement in a cell holding no more than two persons (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18), forced shaving (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15294/18, 21401/18, 44351/18), constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts); Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, §§ 39-40, 20 January 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 151-63, 15 May 2012; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.78210/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, 34068/19, and 38336/19, did the applicants have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaints, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, and 38336/19, were the conditions of the applicants' detention and transport compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 46-58, 28 November 2013; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 64-81, 92-98, 6 March 2014; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, and 38336/19, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for the complaint about conditions of detention under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 93-119, and Sergey Babushkin, cited above, §§ 36-45)?.
2634/17 and 15294/18, were the applicants subjected to constant video surveillance during their detention in prisons? If so, did that measure constitute an interference with their private life? If so, was it justified under Article 8 § 2 of the Convention (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019)? In particular:.
79064/17.
15294/18.
- EGMR, 29.06.2021 - 9798/12
RESIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
(a) Did the application of handcuffs to applicants (in all cases), using dogs to guard the applicants during their transportation (applications nos. 6725/18, 15031/18, 34068/19), separation of the life convicts from other prison population and their solitary confinement or placement in a cell holding no more than two persons (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18), forced shaving (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15294/18, 21401/18, 44351/18), constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts); Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, §§ 39-40, 20 January 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 151-63, 15 May 2012; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.78210/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, 34068/19, and 38336/19, did the applicants have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaints, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, and 38336/19, were the conditions of the applicants' detention and transport compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 46-58, 28 November 2013; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 64-81, 92-98, 6 March 2014; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, and 38336/19, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for the complaint about conditions of detention under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 93-119, and Sergey Babushkin, cited above, §§ 36-45)?.
15031/18.
- EGMR, 25.08.2022 - 34068/19
SKIBENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
(a) Did the application of handcuffs to applicants (in all cases), using dogs to guard the applicants during their transportation (applications nos. 6725/18, 15031/18, 34068/19), separation of the life convicts from other prison population and their solitary confinement or placement in a cell holding no more than two persons (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15031/18, 15294/18), forced shaving (applications nos. 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 15294/18, 21401/18, 44351/18), constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts); Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, §§ 39-40, 20 January 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 151-63, 15 May 2012; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.What were the legal grounds for attaching the applicants to a wire rope together with several other prisoners during their transfer (applications nos. 34068/19 and 38336/19)?.
78210/17, 15031/18, 15294/18, 34068/19, and 38336/19, did the applicants have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaints, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
34068/19.
- EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 55659/14
RUDYKH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, and 38336/19, were the conditions of the applicants' detention and transport compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 46-58, 28 November 2013; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 64-81, 92-98, 6 March 2014; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.29086/18.
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
The applicants also complain about poor conditions of detention and transport (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019), forced shaving (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts)), video surveillance in cells (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-100, 2 July 2019), segregation on account of the life prisoner status (see Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), detention in a cage at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 77-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and lack of effective remedies to protect their rights.2634/17, 71295/17, 78210/17, 79064/17, 6725/18, 15031/18, 15294/18, 21401/18, 29086/18, 44351/18, 15943/19, 30453/19, and 38336/19, were the conditions of the applicants' detention and transport compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 46-58, 28 November 2013; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 64-81, 92-98, 6 March 2014; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
- EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 18255/10
TOMOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
The applicants also complain about poor conditions of detention and transport (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019), forced shaving (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts)), video surveillance in cells (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-100, 2 July 2019), segregation on account of the life prisoner status (see Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), detention in a cage at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 77-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and lack of effective remedies to protect their rights.18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019)?.
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 15018/11
HARAKCHIEV AND TOLUMOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
The applicants also complain about poor conditions of detention and transport (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019), forced shaving (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts)), video surveillance in cells (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-100, 2 July 2019), segregation on account of the life prisoner status (see Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), detention in a cage at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 77-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and lack of effective remedies to protect their rights.15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts))? What were the reasons and legal grounds for applying the above measures to the applicants? The Government are invited to indicate periods when the applicants were subjected to the above measures and to provide supporting documents relating to application of these measures.
- EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
The applicants also complain about poor conditions of detention and transport (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019), forced shaving (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts)), video surveillance in cells (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-100, 2 July 2019), segregation on account of the life prisoner status (see Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), detention in a cage at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 77-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and lack of effective remedies to protect their rights.2634/17 and 15294/18, were the applicants subjected to constant video surveillance during their detention in prisons? If so, did that measure constitute an interference with their private life? If so, was it justified under Article 8 § 2 of the Convention (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019)? In particular:.
- EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR - 2634/17
The applicants also complain about poor conditions of detention and transport (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 9 April 2019), forced shaving (see Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 99-122, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts)), video surveillance in cells (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-100, 2 July 2019), segregation on account of the life prisoner status (see Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 179-214, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), detention in a cage at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 77-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and lack of effective remedies to protect their rights.2634/17 and 15943/19, were the applicants subjected to degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, on account of their confinement in a metal cage in the courtrooms (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev, nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 10/10
BRUNNER v. TURKEY
- KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08
Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03
VANZHULA v. RUSSIA
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 04.04.2003 - 19/02
- RG, 30.05.1908 - I 30/08
Förmlichkeiten des Protestes, durch den die Präsentation eines eigenen …
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09
GORBULYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 59655/14
VORONTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 21205/12
BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
2634/17, 79064/17 and 15294/18, the applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).21205/12, 2634/17, 66813/17, 79064/17 and 15294/18, the applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.
21205/12, 2634/17, 66813/17, 79064/17 and 15294/18 inadmissible;.
2634/17.
79064/17.
15294/18.
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 24308/17
LIU v. CYPRUS
By a letter dated 29 June 2017 the applicant's lawyer informed the Court that on 28 June 2017 the applicant, who had been granted legal aid by the Nicosia District Court, lodged a civil action seeking damages for a violation of her right to a trial within a reasonable time under Article 30(2) of the Constitution and Article 6 of the Convention (no. 2634/17).The applicant's lawyer maintained this position in his letter of 29 June 2017 in explaining why civil action no. 2634/17 was not brought under Law no. 2(I)/2010 (see paragraph 7 above).
In so far as civil action no. 2634/17 is concerned (see paragraph 7 above), the Court notes that the proceedings are still pending.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".