Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 23.11.2004

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,54270
EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,54270)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.10.2005 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,54270)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. Oktober 2005 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,54270)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,54270) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    FEDOTOV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5,, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    No violation of Art. 3 (one period of detention) Violation of Art. 3 (other period of detention) Violation of Art. 5-1 Not necessary to examine under Art. 5-2 5-3 and 5-4 Violation of Art. 5-5 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - State to ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (81)Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    The assessment of this level is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    The assessment of this level is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 03.06.2003 - 33343/96

    PANTEA c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 is complied with where it is possible to apply for compensation in respect of a deprivation of liberty effected in conditions contrary to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 or 4. The right to compensation set forth in paragraph 5 therefore presupposes that a violation of one of the preceding paragraphs of Article 5 has been established, either by a domestic authority or by the Court (N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 49, ECHR 2002-X; Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, judgment of 3 June 2003, § 262).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 25964/02

    POZNAKHIRINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    It therefore considers that the Government should secure, by appropriate means, the enforcement of the award made by the domestic courts (see Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, § 33; Makarova and Others v. Russia, no. 7023/03, § 37, judgments of 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02

    WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    Rn. 95 The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Zhovner v. Ukraine, no. 56848/00, § 37 et seq., 29 June 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 7023/03

    MAKAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    It therefore considers that the Government should secure, by appropriate means, the enforcement of the award made by the domestic courts (see Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, § 33; Makarova and Others v. Russia, no. 7023/03, § 37, judgments of 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02
    However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12

    Lampedusa-Haft war illegal

    It discloses a most grave violation of that provision and is incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 (see Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, § 78, 25 October 2005; Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 87, ECHR 2006-III; and Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2026 - 52652/20

    ZAKUTNIY v. UKRAINE and 7 other applications

    The Court has already found that even a very short period - 22 hours - spent in extremely poor conditions may give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, §§ 20, 55, 67, 68 and 104, 25 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

    Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

    The Court has already found that even a very short period of time - twenty-two hours - spent in conditions quite similar to these endured by Mr Neshkov in Stara Zagora Prison were in breach of this provision (see Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, §§ 20, 55, 67, 68 and 104, 25 October 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 5140/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,56674
EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2004,56674)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.11.2004 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2004,56674)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. November 2004 - 5140/02 (https://dejure.org/2004,56674)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,56674) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 5140/02
    Lastly, the right must be a civil one (see, for example, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, § 47; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 87, ECHR 2001-V; Gutfreund v. France, no. 45681/99, § 38, ECHR 2003-VII).
  • EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 41978/98

    BOZHILOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 5140/02
    A relevant issue is whether the contested decision was delivered in the exercise of discretionary powers or affected a clear entitlement arising out of the fulfilment of particular conditions set out by law (see Bozhilov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41978/98, 22 November 2001, with further references).
  • EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 36542/97

    NOVOTNY v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 5140/02
    In any event, the "right" to be elected or appointed to the president of the association cannot be described as a right which is "civil" in nature (see Novotny v. the Czech Republic, no. 36542/97, Commission decision of 1 July 1998).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht