Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 11.07.2013

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09, 10638/08, 12993/05, 7087/04, 48243/11, 26764/06, 10387/07, 2737/04, 72967/01, 22053/02, 1253/04, 31917/07, 11214/07, 1603/02, 8681/06, 4345/06, 7923/04, 41472/06, 17504/07, 39655/10, 80015/12, 11886/05, 48929/08, 49689/10, 25071/07, 1937/05, 2638   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,20196
EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09, 10638/08, 12993/05, 7087/04, 48243/11, 26764/06, 10387/07, 2737/04, 72967/01, 22053/02, 1253/04, 31917/07, 11214/07, 1603/02, 8681/06, 4345/06, 7923/04, 41472/06, 17504/07, 39655/10, 80015/12, 11886/05, 48929/08, 49689/10, 25071/07, 1937/05, 2638 (https://dejure.org/2018,20196)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.06.2018 - 9096/09, 10638/08, 12993/05, 7087/04, 48243/11, 26764/06, 10387/07, 2737/04, 72967/01, 22053/02, 1253/04, 31917/07, 11214/07, 1603/02, 8681/06, 4345/06, 7923/04, 41472/06, 17504/07, 39655/10, 80015/12, 11886/05, 48929/08, 49689/10, 25071/07, 1937/05, 2638 (https://dejure.org/2018,20196)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juni 2018 - 9096/09, 10638/08, 12993/05, 7087/04, 48243/11, 26764/06, 10387/07, 2737/04, 72967/01, 22053/02, 1253/04, 31917/07, 11214/07, 1603/02, 8681/06, 4345/06, 7923/04, 41472/06, 17504/07, 39655/10, 80015/12, 11886/05, 48929/08, 49689/10, 25071/07, 1937/05, 2638 (https://dejure.org/2018,20196)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20196) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ABASHEV AGAINST RUSSIA AND 122 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 9096/09
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09, 10638/08, 12993/05, 7087/04, 48243/11, 26764/06, 10387/07, 2737/04, 72967/01, 22053/02, 1253/04, 31917/07, 11214/07, 1603/02, 8681/06, 4345/06, 7923/04, 41472/06, 17504/07, 39655/10, 80015/12, 11886/05, 48929/08, 49689/10, 25071/07, 1937/05, 2638
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (131)

  • EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 29431/05

    [ENG]

    It has already found a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention in a number of cases against Russia, where, for instance, the proceedings by which the lawfulness of applicants' detention was decided lasted twenty-six (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006), twenty (see Butusov v. Russia, no. 7923/04, §§ 32-35, 22 December 2009) or twenty-seven days (see Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623/03, §§ 154-56, 23 October 2012), stressing that their entire duration was attributable to the authorities.
  • EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 27843/11

    [ENG]

    The Court reiterates that it is for the State to organise its judicial system in such a way as to enable the courts to comply with the requirements of Article 5 § 4 (see Butusov v. Russia, no. 7923/04, § 34, 22 December 2009).
  • EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 27297/07

    KOLOMENSKIY v. RUSSIA

    À titre de comparaison, elle rappelle que, dans les arrêts Shcherbakov c. Russie (no 2) (no 34959/07, § 101, 24 octobre 2013) et Butusov c. Russie (no 7923/04, § 34, 22 décembre 2009), elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention pour des durées de trente-quatre jours et de vingt jours respectivement.
  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 24580/06

    [ENG]

    Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that these delays cannot be considered compatible with the requirement of "speediness" laid down in Article 5 § 4 (see for example Butusov v. Russia, no. 7923/04, § 35, 22 December 2009, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 86, 87, ECHR 2000-XII, Witek cited above § 59).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 29747/09

    [FRE]

    A titre de comparaison, la Cour rappelle que dans les arrêts Rehbock c. Slovénie (no 29462/95, § 84, CEDH 2000-XII) et Butusov c. Russie (no 7923/04, § 34, 22 décembre 2009), elle a conclu à la violation de cet article pour des durées de vingt-trois et vingt jours respectivement.
  • EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 13453/07

    WITEK v. POLAND

    Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the delay of thirty days cannot be considered compatible with the requirement of "speediness" laid down in Article 5 § 4 (see for example Butusov v. Russia, no. 7923/04, § 35, 22 December 2009, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 86, 87, ECHR 2000-XII).
  • EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 80452/12

    CHRISTODOULOU ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

    &Omegaς συγκριτικό στ&omikron;ιχεί&omikron;, αναφέρει ότι στις απ&omikron;φάσεις Rehbock c. Slovénie ( αρ 29462/95, § 84, CEDH 2000-XII), Butusov c. Russie( αρ 7923/04, § 34, 22 Δεκεµβρί&omikron;υ 2009), και Τσιτσιρίγκ&omikron;ς κατά Ελλάδ&omikron;ς(αρ 29747/09, § 66, 17 Ιαν&omikron;υαρί&omikron;υ 2012), έκρινε ότι υπήρξε παραβίαση τ&omikron;υ άρθρ&omikron;υ αυτ&omikron;Ï για τις χρ&omikron;νικές διάρκειες των είκ&omikron;σι τριών, είκ&omikron;σι και είκ&omikron;σι δÏ&omikron; ηµερών αντίστ&omikron;ιχα.}}.
  • EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 29049/12

    STERGIOPOULOS c. GRÈCE

    Για λόγ&omikron;υς σÏγκρισης, υπενθυµίζει ότι, στις απ&omikron;φάσεις Rehbock κατά Σλ&omikron;βενίας (αριθ. 29462/95, § 84, CEDH 2000-XII), Kadem κατά Μάλτας (αριθ. 55263/00, §§ 44-45, 9 Ιαν&omikron;υαρί&omikron;υ 2003), Memedova κατά Ρωσίας (αριθ. 7064/05, § 96, 1η Ι&omikron;υνί&omikron;υ 2006), Butusov κατά Ρωσίας (αριθ. 7923/04, § 34, 22 Δεκεµβρί&omikron;υ 2009) και Τσιτσιρίγγ&omikron;ς κατά Ελλάδας (αριθ. 29747/09, § 66, 17 Ιαν&omikron;υαρί&omikron;υ 2012), έχει διαπιστώσει την παραβίαση τ&omikron;υ άρθρ&omikron;υ αυτ&omikron;Ï για διαστήµατα είκ&omikron;σι τριών, δεκαεπτά, είκ&omikron;σι έξι, είκ&omikron;σι και είκ&omikron;σι δÏ&omikron; ηµερών αντίστ&omikron;ιχα.
  • EGMR, 08.03.2018 - 39726/10

    [FRE]

    Για λόγ&omikron;υς σÏγκρισης, υπενθυµίζει ότι, µεταξÏ άλλων, στις απ&omikron;φάσεις Rehbock κατά Σλ&omikron;βενίας (αριθ. 29462/95, § 84, CEDH, 2000-XII), Butusov (αριθ. 7923/04, § 34, 22 Δεκεµβρί&omikron;υ 2009), Τσιτσιρίγγ&omikron;ς κατά Ελλάδας (αριθ. 29747/09, § 66, 17 Ιαν&omikron;υαρί&omikron;υ 2012) και Χριστ&omikron;δ&omikron;Ïλ&omikron;υ και λ&omikron;ιπ&omikron;ί κατά Ελλάδας (αριθ. 80452/12, § 70, 5 Ι&omikron;υνί&omikron;υ 2014), έχει καταλήξει στην παραβίαση τ&omikron;υ άρθρ&omikron;υ αυτ&omikron;Ï για διαστήµατα είκ&omikron;σι τριών, είκ&omikron;σι, είκ&omikron;σι δÏ&omikron; και σαράντα επτά ηµερών αντίστ&omikron;ιχα.
  • EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 29896/13

    LAVRENTIADIS c. GRÈCE

    Á titre de comparaison, elle rappelle que, dans les arrêts Rehbock c. Slovénie (no 29462/95, § 84, CEDH 2000-XII), Butusov c. Russie (no 7923/04, § 34, 22 décembre 2009), Tsitsiriggos c. Grèce (no 29747/09, § 66, 17 janvier 2012) et Christodoulou et autres c. Grèce (no 80452/12, § 70, 5 juin 2014), elle a conclu à la violation de cet article pour des durées de vingt-trois, vingt, vingt-deux et quarante-sept jours respectivement.
  • EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 45957/11

    KRASSAS c. GRECE

  • EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 37042/14

    CHAYKA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 7723/07

    SEMENOV AND BACHURINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 66921/16

    LIPAYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 42259/07

    BOYKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 24157/11

    SOLOVEY v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,15938
EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,15938)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11.07.2013 - 7087/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,15938)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11. Juli 2013 - 7087/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,15938)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,15938) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (14)

  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    For a summary of the relevant domestic law provisions governing detention pending investigation and trial, see the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 78-93, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, §§ 69-78, 11 October 2011.

    The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian authorities" failure to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the detention of applicants (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-111, 27 November 2012, with numerous further references, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 179-89, ECHR 2005-X).

  • EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2006 - 50358/99

    PEKOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    It is hence not necessary to examine, in the context of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, whether the proceedings against the applicant were conducted with due diligence (see Pekov v. Bulgaria, no. 50358/99, § 85, 30 March 2006).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 22674/02

    OBLOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    An accused in criminal proceedings, especially when he remains in detention pending investigation or trial, should be entitled to have his case conducted with special diligence and Article 6, in criminal matters, is designed to ensure that a person who has been detained is not kept in a state of uncertainty about his fate for a prolonged period (see Oblov v. Russia, no. 22674/02, § 24, 15 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2563/06

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    It has not been alleged, and the Court does not consider, that there were any significant periods of inactivity attributable to the State during the preliminary investigation (see Shenoyev v. Russia, no. 2563/06, § 63, 10 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 18273/04

    BARRY v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    However, in the absence of submissions from the parties on the matter, the Court does not have sufficient details and thus cannot but accept that the period to be taken into consideration started, in so far as the length of proceedings is concerned, on 12 April 2002, when the applicant became substantially affected by the proceedings (see Barry v. Ireland, no. 18273/04, §§ 33-35, 15 December 2005, and Romanova, cited above, § 138).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

    Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    The national authorities must establish the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 62-63, 10 March 2009).
  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

    Neumeister ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    As to the risk of flight, the Court reiterates that this risk should be assessed with reference to various factors, especially those relating to the character of the person involved, his morals, his home, his occupation, his assets, his family ties and all kinds of links with the country in which he is being prosecuted (see Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, § 10, Series A no. 8).
  • EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03
    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    Thus, it should be established whether the other grounds given by the authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 44, ECHR 2006-X).
  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04
    The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian authorities" failure to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the detention of applicants (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-111, 27 November 2012, with numerous further references, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 179-89, ECHR 2005-X).
  • EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
  • EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 27561/02

    SOLMAZ c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02

    ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 42296/09

    KOVROV v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications

    In particular, as regards the risk of absconding, when assessing that risk, the courts did not have regard to various relevant factors, especially those relating to the character of the person involved, his morals, his home, his occupation, his assets, his family ties, international connections or any other elements which could be relevant in the circumstances (see Aleksandr Novikov v. Russia, no. 7087/04, § 46, 11 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

    ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    7087/04.
  • EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 7427/06

    [ENG]

    The Court recalls that it has frequently found violations of Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases against Russia on account of inhuman and degrading conditions of applicants" pre-trial detention and an excessive length of criminal proceedings against them (see, among other authorities, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, Aleksandr Novikov v. Russia, no. 7087/04, 11 July 2013, Moskovets v. Russia, no. 14370/03, 23 April 2009 and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI).
  • EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 43379/04

    [ENG]

    As to the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, the Court has on many occasions found a violation of the Convention on account of unreasonably long criminal proceedings in Russian courts (see, among many others, Starokadomskiy v. Russia (no. 2), no. 27455/06, 13 March 2014, Aleksandr Novikov v. Russia, no. 7087/04, 11 July 2013, Moskovets v. Russia, no. 14370/03, 23 April 2009 and Vlasov v. Russia, no. 78146/01, 12 June 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht