Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,38723
EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,38723)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.11.2006 - 7615/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,38723)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. November 2006 - 7615/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,38723)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,38723) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IMAKAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Art. 2, Art. ... 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 No separate issues under Art. 6 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 in respect of the alleged violations of Art. 2 and 3 No separate issues ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE [Extraits]

    Art. 2, Art. ... 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 (volet matériel) Violation de l'art. 2 (volet procédural) Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 5 Aucune question distincte au regard de l'art. 6 Violation de l'art. 8 Violation de l'art. 13 en ce qui concerne les violations ...

  • humanrights.ch PDF

    (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (267)Zitiert selbst (20)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 146-147).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    140. In the Timurta v. Turkey judgment (no. 23531/94, §§ 82-83, ECHR 2000-VI) the Court stated:.
  • EGMR, 15.05.2001 - 58752/00

    ABRIAL ET AUTRES contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    The Court also recalls that in a number of comparable cases reviewed and pending before the Court, similar requests have been made to the Russian Government and the documents from the investigation files have been submitted without a reference to Article 161 (see, for example, Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia cited above, § 46; Magomadov and Magomadov v. Russia (dec.), no. 58752/00, 24 November 2005).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    authorities to account for individuals under their control, Article 5 requires them to take effective measures to safeguard against the risk of disappearance and to conduct a prompt and effective investigation into an arguable claim that a person has been taken into custody and has not been seen since (see Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no.23657/94, § 104, ECHR-1999-IV; and Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, § 164, 27 February 2001).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    They cannot leave it to the initiative of the next of kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigatory procedures (see lhan v. Turkey [GC] no. 22277/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

    MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in the maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Tanrikulu v. Turkey cited above, § 109; Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, ECHR 2000-III, §§ 106-107).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

    MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    The Government failed to specify the nature of the documents and the grounds on which they could not be disclosed (see, for similar conclusions, Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 104, 26 January 2006).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

    ORHAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    Relevant elements will include the proximity of the family tie ­ in that context, a certain weight will attach to the parentchild bond, ­ the particular circumstances of the relationship, the extent to which the family member witnessed the events in question, the involvement of the family member in the attempts to obtain information about the disappeared person and the way in which the authorities responded to those enquiries (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002; Çakici v. Turkey, cited above, § 98; and Timurta v. Turkey, cited above, § 95).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    194. In view of the Court's findings above on Articles 2 and 3, these complaints are clearly "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131 § 52).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
    The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony (see for example, Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94

    CICEK v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 30494/96

    TUNCER AND DURMUS v. TURKEY

  • RG, 30.11.1935 - I 34/35

    Ist ein Patent für nichtig zu erklären, wenn es zu Unrecht als Zusatzpatent …

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01

    TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 7511/13

    Polen als Handlanger der CIA

    In particular, in a case where the application raises issues concerning the effectiveness of the investigation, the documents of the criminal investigation are fundamental to the establishment of the facts and their absence may prejudice the Court's proper examination of the complaint both at the admissibility and at the merits stage (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 70, ECHR 1999 IV; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 200, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

    The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and has consistently recognised that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see Imakayeva, cited above, no. 7615/02, § 113, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos.

    The burden of proof in such a case may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see El-Masri, cited above, § 152; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, §§ 114-115, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts).

  • EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12

    Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter

    The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and has consistently recognised that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 113, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos.

    Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts).

  • EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01

    AZIYEVY v. RUSSIA

    The Court further notes that it has already found on a number of occasions that the provisions of Article 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure do not preclude disclosure of documents from a pending investigation file, but rather set out a procedure for and limits to such disclosure (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 104, 26 January 2006, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).

    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see, among other authorities, Bazorkina, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; and Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007).

    Furthermore, the Court notes that it is its standard practice to rule that awards in relation to costs and expenses are to be paid directly into the applicant's representatives" accounts (see, for example, ToÄŸcu, cited above, § 158; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 175, ECHR 2005-VII; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-...).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht