Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 11 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAESTRI v. ITALY

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 11 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 39748/98
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

Wird zitiert von ... (147)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• BVerfG, 14.10.2004 - 2 BvR 1481/04

  EGMR-Entscheidungen

  Folglich sei es Sache des beklagten Staates, jedes Hindernis im innerstaatlichen Recht zu beseitigen, das einer Wiedergutmachung der Situation des Beschwerdeführers entgegensteht (vgl. EGMR, a.a.O., EuGRZ 2004, S. 268 unter Hinweis auf EGMR, No. 39748/98, Urteil vom 17. Februar 2004, Ziffer 47 - Maestri).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 3111/10

  Urteil gegen Türkei wegen Online-Zensur

  En conséquence, elle doit définir l'étendue et les modalités d'exercice d'un tel pouvoir avec une netteté suffisante (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Sunday Times, précité, § 49, et Maestri c. Italie [GC], no 39748/98, § 30, CEDH 2004-I).
• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

  Nawalny-Demos auch ohne Erlaubnis

  The Court reiterates its case-law to the effect that the expressions 'prescribed by law' and 'in accordance with the law' in Articles 8 to 11 of the Convention not only requires that the impugned measure should have a legal basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, which should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see, among other authorities, Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V; VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI; Gawęda v. Poland, no. 26229/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-II; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; Vyerentsov, cited above, § 52; Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2004-I; and Sindicatul 'Păstorul cel Bun' v. Romania [GC], no. 2330/09, § 153, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).

  Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion and the manner of its exercise (see, among other authorities, Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; and Lashmankin and Others, cited above, § 411).

• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 15669/20

  YALÇINKAYA v. TURKEY

  Rn. 388 According to the Court's settled case-law the expressions "prescribed by law" and "in accordance with the law" in Articles 8 to 11 of the Convention not only require that the impugned measure should have some basis in domestic law, but that it should also be compatible with the rule of law, which, as indicated above, is inherent in all its Articles (see paragraph 350 above; see also Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  A judgment in which the Court finds a violation imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention to put an end to the violation found and make reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see Mentes and Others v. Turkey (just satisfaction), 24 July 1998, § 24, Reports 1998-IV; Scozzari and Giunta, cited above, § 249; Maestri v. Italy (GC), no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I; and Assanidze v. Georgia (GC), no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 17792/07

  Kallweit ./. Deutschland

  Folglich obliegt es dem beschwerdegegnerischen Staat, alle Hindernisse in seiner innerstaatlichen Rechtsordnung zu beseitigen, die verhindern könnten, dass hinsichtlich der Lage des Beschwerdeführers angemessene Abhilfe geschaffen wird (siehe Maestri ./. Italien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 39748/98, Rdnr. 47, ECHR 2004-I;… und Assanidze ./. Georgien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 71503/01, Rdnr. 198, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17

  Selahattin Demirtas

  It follows, inter alia, that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and make all feasible reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see, among many other authorities, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I; Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII; Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 85, ECHR 2009; Assanidze, cited above, § 198; Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 172, 22 April 2010; and Del Río Prada, cited above, § 137).
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  [FRE]

  The Court reiterates its settled case-law, according to which the expression "in accordance with law" not only requires that the impugned measure should have some basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the persons concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Khlyustov, cited above, § 68; X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, § 58, ECHR 2013; Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V; and Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
  It follows, inter alia, that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and make all feasible reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I; Menteş and Others v. Turkey (Article 50), judgment of 24 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1695, § 24; and Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 09.01.2013 - 21722/11

  Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine

  Il en découle notamment que l'État défendeur reconnu responsable d'une violation de la Convention ou de ses Protocoles est appelé non seulement à verser aux intéressés les sommes allouées à titre de satisfaction équitable, mais aussi à choisir, sous le contrôle du Comité des Ministres, les mesures générales et/ou, le cas échéant, individuelles à adopter dans son ordre juridique interne afin de mettre un terme à la violation constatée par la Cour et d'en effacer dans la mesure du possible les conséquences de manière à rétablir autant que faire se peut la situation antérieure à celle-ci (Maestri c. Italie [GC], no 39748/98, § 47, CEDH 2004-I, Assanidzé c. Géorgie [GC], no 71503/01, § 198, CEDH 2004-II, et Ilaşcu et autres c. Moldova et Russie [GC], no 48787/99, § 487, CEDH 2004-VII).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 16538/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt
• EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 21906/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  FONTES MOREIRA FERREIRA c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12

  Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit
• EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 14305/17

  Selahattin Demirtas
• EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11

  Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Mitglieder der Versammlung von Gldani der Zeugen Jehovas u.a. ./. Georgien
• EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 43734/14

  Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny
• EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 17224/11

  MEDZLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRCKO I DRUGI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
• EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 20008/07

  Mautes ./. Deutschland
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 28470/12

  NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 62540/00

  ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND EKIMDZHIEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 14988/09

  Homosexuellen-Kundgebungen verboten: Russland erneut verurteilt
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07

  ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 44873/09

  OGNEVENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02

  CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 11.12.2025 - 13186/20

  Gewaltsame Auflösung der georgischen Proteste: Polizeieinsatz war unmenschliche …
• EGMR, 29.05.2019 - 15172/13

  EGMR moniert Verstöße Aserbaidschans gegen Urteile
• EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 41226/09

  Türkei verurteilt: Nicht jeder ist ein Terrorist
• EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 46390/10

  [ENG]
• EuG, 31.05.2018 - T-770/16

  Das Gericht hebt die Beschlüsse auf, mit denen das Präsidium des Europäischen …
• EGMR, 09.02.2017 - 67259/14

  SELMANI AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
• EuG, 31.05.2018 - T-352/17

  Korwin-Mikke/ Parlament - Institutionelles Recht - Europäisches Parlament - …
• EGMR, 09.05.2018 - 52273/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 27065/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 37083/03

  TEBIETI MÜHAFIZE CEMIYYETI AND ISRAFILOV c. AZERBAIDJAN
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 21086/04

  DANESHPAYEH c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 51857/13

  AMIROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 48408/12

  TYMOSHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 20372/11

  VYERENTSOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 11214/19

  INTERNATIONALE HUMANITÄRE HILFSORGANISATION E. V. v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02

  BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 1413/08

  Verstoß gegen Religions- und Meinungsfreiheit: russisches Verbot von islamischen …
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 25446/06

  YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 71525/01

  DUMITRU POPESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 2699/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42337/12

  SUSO MUSA v. MALTA
• EGMR, 11.12.2025 - 15587/10

  DIACO c. ITALIE et 2 autres affaires
• EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 36617/18

  ITALGOMME PNEUMATICI S.R.L. v. ITALY and 12 other applications
• EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 14879/20

  DURUKAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 42911/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 40662/19

  SEVDARI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20

  MAQARASHVILI v. GEORGIA and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 61064/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 46713/10

  BAKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 38736/04

  FC MRETEBI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 52980/99

  STORNAIUOLO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64897/01

  ERNESTINA ZULLO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64886/01

  COCCHIARELLA v. ITALY
• EGMR, 22.10.2024 - 1766/23

  J.B. AND OTHERS v. MALTA
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 12427/22

  A.D. v. MALTA
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 22.01.2020 - C-634/18

  Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słupsku - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Justizielle …
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 6312/13

  LUTSKEVICH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 37575/04

  BOULOIS v. LUXEMBOURG
• EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 25336/04

  GRORI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65075/01

  GIUSEPPINA AND ORESTINA PROCACCINI v. ITALY
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 72173/17

  LEGROS c. FRANCE et 3 autres affaires
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 13326/18

  PÂRVU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2020 - 16558/18

  KILIÇDAROGLU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12

  KOSTOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 63686/13

  STEPAN ZIMIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 44023/09

  BATMAZ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 14966/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65102/01

  GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 2)
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 62361/00

  RICCARDI PIZZATI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 08.01.2026 - 40607/19

  FERRIERI v. ITALY and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 69483/13

  MUSTAFA HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 41747/10

  ISGiN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 46564/15

  KORPORATIVNA TARGOVSKA BANKA AD v. BULGARIA + 1 other application
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 56070/18

  STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 35623/11

  TSONYO TSONEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 57316/10

  IMRET c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 11765/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 18896/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 44363/02

  RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64890/01

  APICELLA v. ITALY
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64705/01

  GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 1)
• EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  JAFAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 28.02.2019 - 4755/16

  BEGHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 26238/10

  BRISC v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 4966/13

  BARABANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 58493/13

  OLAFSSON v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 18766/04

  TSARTSIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 16664/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.09.2015 - 41246/98

  ÜNAL AKPINAR INSAAT SANAYI TURIZM MADENCILIK VE TICARET S.A. c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 57722/12

  GRABOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 412/03

  HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS …
• EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 32283/04
• EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 33729/06

  MARTINS CASTRO ET ALVES CORREIA DE CASTRO c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64699/01

  MUSCI v. ITALY
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 25820/07

  STANKOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 64791/10

  M.D. AND OTHERS v. MALTA
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 40765/02

  APOSTOL v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 66994/14

  HRVATSKI GOLF SAVEZ v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 62630/13

  POLIKHOVICH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 58630/11

  LJASKAJ v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 39462/03

  KARANOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
• EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 64733/09

  ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34207/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 43467/06

  AKHUNDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 25747/09

  ÇAKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 5334/11

  KRASTEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.01.2015 - 26671/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 8916/05

  ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 4241/03

  TROFIMCHUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 1717/03

  VELOCCI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 13396/03

  IULIANO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 35174/03

  MATTHIAS ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 71310/01

  EMANUELE CALANDRA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 07.01.2025 - 1847/21

  PATRASCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 07.11.2024 - 20592/21

  BAKRADZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 23445/18

  BAYDEMIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 3276/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 162/04

  RITA IPPOLITI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 19403/03

  DEDDA ET FRAGASSI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 18.07.2006 - 75615/01

  STEFANEC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR - 28772/21 (anhängig)

  İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ DERNEĞI v. TÜRKİYE
• EGMR - 77427/14 (anhängig)

  MIKHAYLOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 37326/13

  UNIFAUN THEATRE PRODUCTIONS LIMITED AND OTHERS v. MALTA
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05

  ISLAM-ITTIHAD ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 08.02.2011 - 24874/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 35916/04

  CHALABI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 6562/03

  MKRTCHYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 54268/00

  QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. v. ALBANIA
• EGMR - 13140/16 (anhängig)

  SHEVELEVA v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
• EGMR - 34854/24 (anhängig)

  ATAOĞLU v. TÜRKİYE
• EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 57566/12

  YELVERTON INVESTMENTS B.V. AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 19400/11

  R.R. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 18967/03

  MUTISHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 28736/05

  ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 40269/02

  KORETSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 24837/05

  N.F. c. ITALIE