Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 09.01.2014

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06, 61531/14, 37463/04, 33929/03, 15217/07, 14797/02, 46468/06, 205/02, 43174/10, 66252/14, 1750/03, 25462/09, 67253/01, 37810/03, 36932/02, 106/02, 57502/12, 921/03, 12543/09, 66583/11, 17679/03, 68337/01, 39420/03, 32719/09, 20641/04, 4176/03, 4146   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,41894
EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06, 61531/14, 37463/04, 33929/03, 15217/07, 14797/02, 46468/06, 205/02, 43174/10, 66252/14, 1750/03, 25462/09, 67253/01, 37810/03, 36932/02, 106/02, 57502/12, 921/03, 12543/09, 66583/11, 17679/03, 68337/01, 39420/03, 32719/09, 20641/04, 4176/03, 4146 (https://dejure.org/2018,41894)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.12.2018 - 1439/06, 61531/14, 37463/04, 33929/03, 15217/07, 14797/02, 46468/06, 205/02, 43174/10, 66252/14, 1750/03, 25462/09, 67253/01, 37810/03, 36932/02, 106/02, 57502/12, 921/03, 12543/09, 66583/11, 17679/03, 68337/01, 39420/03, 32719/09, 20641/04, 4176/03, 4146 (https://dejure.org/2018,41894)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Dezember 2018 - 1439/06, 61531/14, 37463/04, 33929/03, 15217/07, 14797/02, 46468/06, 205/02, 43174/10, 66252/14, 1750/03, 25462/09, 67253/01, 37810/03, 36932/02, 106/02, 57502/12, 921/03, 12543/09, 66583/11, 17679/03, 68337/01, 39420/03, 32719/09, 20641/04, 4176/03, 4146 (https://dejure.org/2018,41894)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,41894) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    A.B. CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 135 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    A.B. AGAINST RUSSIA AND 135 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 1439/06
  • EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06, 61531/14, 37463/04, 33929/03, 15217/07, 14797/02, 46468/06, 205/02, 43174/10, 66252/14, 1750/03, 25462/09, 67253/01, 37810/03, 36932/02, 106/02, 57502/12, 921/03, 12543/09, 66583/11, 17679/03, 68337/01, 39420/03, 32719/09, 20641/04, 4176/03, 4146
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Zitiert selbst (143)

  • KAG Mainz, 12.01.2012 - M 28/11

    "Einkehrtag" als beteiligungspflichtige Veranstaltung

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06
    28/11/2011.

    28/11/2011.

    28/11/2011.

    28/11/2013,.

  • KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11

    Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06
    12/11/2007.

    12/11/2007.

    12/11/2015.

  • EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 24/11

    CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06
    24/11/2016.

    24/11/2016.

    24/11/2016.

    24/11/2016.

  • EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 28005/08

    [ENG]

    In cases where the applicants referred to both the aforementioned provisions in respect of allegedly inadequate medical assistance available to them in detention, but where there was no death, the Court examined the complaint under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, A.B. v. Russia, no. 1439/06, § 114, 14 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 56759/08

    [FRE]

    Υπό αυτές τις περιστάσεις, δÏναται να αφήσει την επιλ&omikron;γή τ&omikron;υ µÎ­τρ&omikron;υ και της εφαρµ&omikron;γής αυτ&omikron;Ï στην διακριτική ευχέρεια τ&omikron;υ εµπλεκ&omikron;µÎ­ν&omikron;υ Κράτ&omikron;υς (βλ. για παράδειγµα, Aleksanyan c. Russie, αρ. 46468/06, παρ.
  • EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 769/13

    TOCARENCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

    Dans ces circonstances, elle peut laisser le choix de la mesure et de l'application de celle-ci à la discrétion de l'État concerné (voir, par exemple, Aleksanyan c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 239, 22 décembre 2008 et Fatullayev c. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, §§ 174-177, 22 avril 2010).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 2447/05

    CARA-DAMIANI c. ITALIE

    Par ailleurs, s'agissant de fournir les soins médicaux appropriés, il faut avoir égard aux exigences pratiques de l'emprisonnement (Alexanian c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 140, 22 décembre 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 4512/09

    [ENG]

    B., in particular, (see A.B. v. Russia, no. 1439/06, 14 October 2010) provided the following account of the conditions of his detention in wing 2/1 of facility IZ-47/1 of St Petersburg:.
  • EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 29896/13

    LAVRENTIADIS c. GRÈCE

    Ce niveau devrait être « compatible avec la dignité humaine'de chaque détenu (Papastavrou c. Grèce, no 63054/13, § 88, 16 avril 2015), mais devrait aussi prendre en considération « les exigences pratiques de l'incarcération'(Aleksanyan c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 140, 22 décembre 2008).
  • EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 20378/13

    MARTZAKLIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

    Tout en étant consciente des exigences pratiques de la détention, la Cour se reconnait suffisamment de flexibilité pour décider, au cas par cas, si les carences dans les soins médicaux ont été compatibles avec la dignité humaine du détenu (Aleksanyan c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 140, 22 décembre 2008).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 7446/21

    PERSTNER c. LUXEMBOURG

    « (...) La Cour rappelle à cet égard que les autorités ne peuvent justifier le maintien en détention par une simple référence à de tels risques ; elles doivent se référer à des faits précis concernant le comportement du requérant, sa situation personnelle, etc. (...)'(Alexanian c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 182, 22 décembre 2008).
  • EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 63054/13

    PAPASTAVROU c. GRÈCE

    Τ&omikron; επίπεδ&omikron; αυτό πρέπει «να σέβεται την ανθρώπινη αξι&omikron;πρέπεια" κάθε κρατ&omikron;υµÎ­ν&omikron;υ, αλλά πρέπει επίσης να λαµβάνει υπόψη «τις πρακτικές απαιτήσεις της φυλάκισης" (Aleksanyan κατά Ρωσσίας, αρ. 46468/06, § 140, 22 Δεκεµβρί&omikron;υ 2008).
  • EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 66640/10

    [FRE]

    Par ailleurs, s'agissant de fournir les soins médicaux appropriés, il faut avoir égard aux exigences pratiques de l'emprisonnement (Alexanian c. Russie, no 46468/06, § 140, 22 décembre 2008).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 36836/09

    DIMITRAS ET GILBERT c. GRECE

  • EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 11406/11

    NEAGU c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 22395/10

    ASIMAKOPOULOS c. GRÈCE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,43
EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.01.2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Januar 2014 - 66583/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,43)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,43) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (35)Zitiert selbst (14)

  • EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

    Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

    KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court reiterates in this regard that even though Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the part of the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    That conclusion also led to the Court's finding of a breach by the Russian Government of Article 13 of the Convention (see, for example, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 75-91, 27 November 2012, and Reshetnyak v. Russia, no. 56027/10, §§ 62-80, 8 January 201).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 56027/10

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    That conclusion also led to the Court's finding of a breach by the Russian Government of Article 13 of the Convention (see, for example, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 75-91, 27 November 2012, and Reshetnyak v. Russia, no. 56027/10, §§ 62-80, 8 January 201).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

    POPOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla, cited above, §§ 92-94, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

    MELNIK v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-106, 28 March 2006; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko, cited above, § 100; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive treatment strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109, 114; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; and Popov, cited above, § 211).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

    SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-106, 28 March 2006; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko, cited above, § 100; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive treatment strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109, 114; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; and Popov, cited above, § 211).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05

    HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-106, 28 March 2006; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko, cited above, § 100; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive treatment strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109, 114; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; and Popov, cited above, § 211).
  • EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 3242/03

    GLADKIY v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
    The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-106, 28 March 2006; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko, cited above, § 100; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive treatment strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109, 114; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; and Popov, cited above, § 211).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04

    YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 44917/08

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 4171/04

    GRIDIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 01.09.2016 - 62303/13

    Kein Methadon in Haft ist Menschenrechtsverstoß

    Sollten in der Frage, welche Behandlung zur angemessenen Gewährleistung der Gesundheit eines Gefangenen notwendig ist, die Meinungen der Ärzte auseinandergehen, kann es erforderlich sein, dass die innerstaatlichen Behörden und Gerichte zusätzlichen Rat eines spezialisierten medizinischen Sachverständigen einholen, um ihrer positiven Verpflichtung aus Artikel 3 nachzukommen (vgl. Xiros, a. a. O., Rdnrn. 87 und 89-90; und Budanov./. Russland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 66583/11, Rdnr. 73, 9.
  • EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 38777/04

    [ENG]

    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Khayletdinov v. Russia, no. 2763/13, §§ 71-78, 12 January 2016; Ivko v. Russia, no. 30575/08, §§ 104-12, 15 December 2015; Litvinov v. Russia, no. 32863/13, §§ 90-96, 22 March 2016; Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 80-88, 5 February 2015; and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 68-76, 9 January 2014).

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, §§ 82-92, 22 March 2016, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), and insofar as claims for just satisfaction were lodged by the applicants, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

  • EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1484/16

    IZYUROV AND KUKHARCHUK v. RUSSIA

    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Khayletdinov v. Russia, no. 2763/13, §§ 71-78, 12 January 2016; Ivko v. Russia, no. 30575/08, §§ 104-12, 15 December 2015; Litvinov v. Russia, no. 32863/13, §§ 90-96, 22 March 2016; Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 80-88, 5 February 2015; and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 68-76, 9 January 2014).

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, §§ 82-92, 22 March 2016; Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015; and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and to dismiss the remainder of the applicants' claims.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht