Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MICHALAK v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (151) Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
That rule is based on the assumption, reflected in Article 13 of the Convention - with which it has close affinity - that there is an effective remedy available in respect of the alleged breach in the domestic system (see, for example, Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
However, as the Court has held on many occasions, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, 22 May 2001 and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among many authorities, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).
- EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
However, as the Court has held on many occasions, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, 22 May 2001 and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
In particular, the Court had previously departed from this general rule in cases against Italy, Croatia and Slovakia concerning remedies against the excessive length of the proceedings (see Brusco, cited above, Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII, Andrášik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
The Court had previously adopted the same position and had examined the effectiveness of remedy before the practice of the domestic courts in similar, in substance, Croatian cases (see, Nogolica, cited above, and Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 53126/07
TARON v. GERMANY
Er stellt fest, dass in mehreren die Verfahrensdauer betreffenden Fällen festgestellt wurde, dass solche außergewöhnlichen Umstände vorlagen (…siehe Brusco./. Italien, a.a.O.;… Nogolica./. Kroatien, a.a.O.; Andrásik u. a../. Slowakei (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerden Nrn. 57984/00 et al., ECHR 2002-IX; Michalak./. Polen (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24549/03, Rdnrn. 41-43, 1. März 2005;… and Korenjak./. Slowenien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 463/03, Rdnrn. 63-71, 15. Mai 2007, Fakhretdinov u. a../. Russland, a.a.O.). - EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 30072/04
STEFAN KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND
The Court has already examined remedies provided under sections 5 and 18 of the 2004 Act for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention and found them effective in respect of complaints about the excessive length of judicial proceedings in Poland (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, §§ 36-43, and Michalak v. Poland (dec.) no. 24549/03, §§ 37-44).The Court recalls that it has already examined the remedies under the 2004 Act for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention and found them effective in respect of complaints about the excessive length of judicial proceedings in Poland (see Charzynski, cited above, §§ 36-42; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09
TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
La règle de l'article 35 § 1 se fonde toutefois sur l'hypothèse que l'ordre interne offre un recours effectif quant à la violation alléguée (voir, par exemple, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 152, CEDH 2000-XI, Charzynski c. Pologne (déc.), no 15212/03, CEDH 2005-V, Tadeusz Michalak c. Pologne, (déc.), no 24549/03, 1er mars 2005, et Ä°çyer c. Turquie (déc.), no 18888/02, § 69, CEDH 2006-I).
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-... - also available on the Court's Internet site (http://[email protected]). - EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02
GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
Des décisions semblables ont été rendues dans des affaires contre la Croatie, la Slovaquie et la Pologne à la suite de modifications législatives (Nogolica c. Croatie (déc.), no 77784/01, CEDH 2002-VIII ; Andrásik et autres c. Slovaquie (déc.), nos 57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 et 68563/01, CEDH 2002-IX ; et Michalak c. Pologne (déc.), no 24549/03, 1er mars 2005). - EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02
IÇYER c. TURQUIE
La règle de l'article 35 § 1 se fonde toutefois sur l'hypothèse que l'ordre interne offre un recours effectif quant à la violation alléguée (voir, par exemple, Kudła c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 152, CEDH 2000-XI, arrêt cité dans Charzyński c. Pologne, requête no 15212/03 et dans Tadeusz Michalak c. Pologne, requête no 24549/03, décisions du 1er mars 2005). - EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 59444/00
KANIA v. POLAND
In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred (see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-... - also available on the Court's Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 51635/99
TATRAI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03; §§ 37-43).[1] For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Charzyński v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23; and Michalak v. Poland (dec.) no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-…; also available on the Court's Internet site: [email protected].
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 75304/01
ROSIK v. POLAND
In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-... - also available on the Court's Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 61177/00
SKOTNICZNY v. POLAND
In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-43).For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-... - also available on the Court's Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 75930/01
SZCZERBIN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 52505/99
KAWALKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 62137/00
KAWALKO V. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 55104/00
KAWALKO V. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 75096/01
KAWALKO V. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 15310/03
KAWALKO V. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 19608/02
DOBROGOST v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 10362/02
KORZA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 59743/00
GLEN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 61451/00
KOZANECKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 61425/00
JACZEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 70848/01
GRYSZKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 75097/01
KOWALCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 75871/01
KARDAS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 232/02
KACZMAREK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 4079/02
HOFMAN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 6246/02
KAPES v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 50428/99
DZIEDZIC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 57661/00
KORAL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 62448/00
ROSLON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 65622/01
TOPOLAN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 66078/01
ZGODKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 47375/99
POGORZELEC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 58271/10
A.S. c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 56125/10
DEMIROGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 42936/07
ALTUNAY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 40150/09
GLYKANTZI c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 26716/09
FAKHRETDINOV and OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 73191/01
WIKTOROWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 44013/07
YILDIZ ET YANAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06
DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 50973/08
VASSILIOS ATHANASIOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 59740/00
KOWALSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 55459/00
KOSYLAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 21416/02
URBANIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 11166/05
ARIOGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 27451/09
NAGOVITSYN AND NALGIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 37346/05
FINGER v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 463/03
KORENJAK v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 44746/08
BALAN v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64897/01
ERNESTINA ZULLO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64886/01
COCCHIARELLA v. ITALY
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 66365/09
SAVICKAS v. LITHUANIA and 5 other applications
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65075/01
GIUSEPPINA AND ORESTINA PROCACCINI v. ITALY
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65102/01
GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 2)
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 62361/00
RICCARDI PIZZATI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 54421/21
SZAXON v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 73446/10
SOBCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 17229/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 6767/03
RAZNIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64890/01
APICELLA v. ITALY
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64705/01
GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 1)
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 23056/09
MIANOWICZ v. GERMANY AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64699/01
MUSCI v. ITALY
- EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 61226/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 20520/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09
PANAYI v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 19206/03
BRUCZYNSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 40387/06
KRAWCZAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 20138/03
BOBEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 52479/99
RYBACKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 18036/03
CICHLA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 17590/02
PAPAIANOPOL c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 43276/06
MISSENJOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 28633/02
POPLAWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 8812/02
PACHLA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 19186/10
ZIMA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 9097/05
AYDEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 38018/07
KRZYSZTOFIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 14258/03
PARIZOV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 21695/05
TUR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 40552/02
VOKURKA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 72999/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 38945/05
PRALICA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 30848/03
BRONK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 11602/02
SPÓLKA Z O.O. WAZA AND SPÓLKA Z O.O. FILMSET v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 42745/09
YILDIZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 37274/06
SANDOWYCZ c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 14260/03
GJOZEV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 2555/03
GUADAGNINO c. ITALIE ET FRANCE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 5238/07
AHLSKOG v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 24.08.2010 - 483/06
[FRE]
- EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 11700/04
KRZEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 19817/04
ZAJAC c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 9143/02
JELIAZKOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 11562/05
BYRZYKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 43748/98
WIENSZTAL V. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 13425/02
MICHTA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 9399/03
TOMASZEWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 17904/04
DOROTA AND ZBIGNIEW NOWAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 35785/07
TEKIELA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 9959/06
KUFEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 13282/04
BIENKOWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 33985/05
MIROSLAW JABLONSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 39595/05
JAROSLAW JAKUBIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 20334/04
FLOREK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 4064/03
OPALKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
PAWLIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 25789/04
YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 25301/02
ZASLONA c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 14382/04
TONDERYS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 33017/03
WOJCICKA-SUROWKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 23362/02
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 31225/02
SZCZERBOWSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 6334/02
DOLASINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 49035/99
BZDYRA c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 26918/02
TRZCIALKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 24254/03
RABAN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 1427/03
TOMCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 18368/02
BUTA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 26876/03
TRZNADEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 7478/03
KAMINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 75107/01
DOMBEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 13732/03
OSINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 15154/03
MALIKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 20200/02
KWIATKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 41187/02
SZWAGRUN-BAURYCZA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 10816/02
KOZIMOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 63905/00
WASILEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 33866/96
BOGULAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 1420/09
OLKINUORA AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 09.09.2008 - 7766/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 29284/06
JARANOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 6420/02
MODLKOWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 59738/00
JAGIELLO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 68756/01
BARTOSIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 52043/99
WASILEWSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 20484/02
SWIETOCHOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 37175/02
RESZKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 7592/02
SKULSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 45994/99
STRZELECKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 34964/03
KOWALSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 53656/00
ROLINSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 11215/02
RATAJCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 53804/00
WITKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
SURBANOSKA AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 17731/03
HENRYK KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 45027/06
SZWEC c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 33198/04
RUCINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56559/00
SOBOTIAK v. POLAND
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".