Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 07.12.2000

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,35526
EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,35526)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.02.2002 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,35526)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Februar 2002 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2002,35526)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,35526) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MIKULIC v. CROATIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 with regard to the complaint under Article 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 with regard to the complaint under Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MIKULIC c. CROATIE

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de l'art. 8 Violation de l'art. 13 quant au grief tiré de l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 quant au grief tiré de l'art. 8 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (122)Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    The Court will therefore examine whether Croatia, in handling the applicant's paternity claim, has been in breach of its positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55; and, mutatis mutandis, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49).
  • EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

    HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    The Court will therefore examine whether Croatia, in handling the applicant's paternity claim, has been in breach of its positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55; and, mutatis mutandis, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49).
  • EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 22920/93

    M.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see, for instance, Keegan, cited above, p. 19, § 49, and M.B. v. the United Kingdom, no. 22920/93, Commission decision of 6 April 1994, Decisions and Reports 77-A, p. 116).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    Respect for "private life" must also comprise to a certain degree the right to establish relationships with other human beings (see, mutatis mutandis, Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 33-34, § 29).
  • EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    As regards paternity proceedings, the Court has held on numerous occasions that such proceedings do fall within the scope of Article 8 (see, for example, Rasmussen v. Denmark, judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 13, § 33, and Keegan v. Ireland, judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, p. 18, § 45).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    In this connection, the Court has held that the notion of "family life" in Article 8 is not confined solely to marriage-based relationships but may also encompass other de facto "family ties" where sufficient constancy is present (see, for example, Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30).
  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    The Court has held that respect for private life requires that everyone should be able to establish details of their identity as individual human beings and that an individual's entitlement to such information is of importance because of its formative implications for his or her personality (see Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, § 39).
  • EGMR, 28.11.1984 - 8777/79
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    As regards paternity proceedings, the Court has held on numerous occasions that such proceedings do fall within the scope of Article 8 (see, for example, Rasmussen v. Denmark, judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 13, § 33, and Keegan v. Ireland, judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, p. 18, § 45).
  • EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    However, the period which falls within the Court's jurisdiction did not begin on that date, but on 6 November 1997, after the Convention entered into force in respect of Croatia (see Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, pp. 18-19, § 53).
  • EGMR, 29.03.1989 - 11118/84
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
    The Court reiterates that particular diligence is required in cases concerning civil status and capacity (see Bock v. Germany, judgment of 29 March 1989, Series A no. 150, p. 23, § 49).
  • BVerfG, 19.04.2016 - 1 BvR 3309/13

    Gegenüber dem mutmaßlich leiblichen Vater gebietet das Grundgesetz keinen …

    In der Rechtssache Mikulic (EGMR, Urteil vom 7. Februar 2002 - 53176/99, Mikulic/Kroatien -, insbes.
  • BGH, 29.10.2014 - XII ZB 20/14

    Exhumierung zur Feststellung der Vaterschaft

    Dabei hat er jedoch betont, dass das - von Art. 8 Abs. 1 EMRK geschützte - Recht auf Kenntnis der eigenen Abstammung für ein Kind von besonderer Bedeutung ist (…EGMR Urteil vom 13. Juli 2006 - Jäggi ./. Schweiz - Individualbeschwerde Nr. 58757/00 - Rn. 39 = FamRZ 2006, 1354; Urteil vom 7. Februar 2002 - Mikulic gg. Kroatien - Rs. 53176/99 - Rn. 64 "vital interest").
  • EGMR, 15.09.2011 - 17080/07

    Schneider ./. Deutschland

    Diese Unterlassung habe auch einen Eingriff in sein durch Artikel 8 geschütztes Recht auf Achtung seines Privatlebens dargestellt (er verwies auf Nylund ./. Finnland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI; und Mikulic ./. Kroatien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 53176/99, ECHR 2002-I).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2000,40656
EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.12.2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Dezember 2000 - 53176/99 (https://dejure.org/2000,40656)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,40656) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see the Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

    Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

    ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    In order to comply with the rule, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria no. 24760/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-VIII).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    Furthermore, under Article 35 the existence of remedies which are available and sufficient must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v, the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, § 39; the Vernillo v. France judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27; and the Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1210 § 66).
  • EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12849/87
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 04.05.1999 - 34406/96

    MAZUREK contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 53176/99
    The Court recalls that according to its well-established case-law paternity disputes do fall within the ambit of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Vermeire v. Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v. Germany no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000 and Mazurek v. France (dec.), no. 34406/96, ECHR 2000).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 35968/97

    Rechtssache V. K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Er kann manchmal Aspekte der physischen und sozialen Identität einer Person umfassen ( Mikulic ./. Kroatien , Beschwerde-Nr. 53176/99, Nr. 53, 7.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht