Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten heute, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarLetzte Chance
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten heute, 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2003,36454
EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,36454)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.11.2003 - 41431/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,36454)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. November 2003 - 41431/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,36454)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,36454) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (187)Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant 's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

    BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    25/02/2004.
  • EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

    MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant 's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 15.10.1999 - 26614/95

    HUMEN c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings at the time (see, among other authorities, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, § 59, 15 October 1999).
  • EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 35648/97

    KUZMIN v. ESTONIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
    Nonetheless, the Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention does not apply to proceedings which determine whether a civil case is to be reopened or not (see Kuzmin v. Estonia, no. 35648/97, Commission decision of 1 July 1998, unreported).
  • EGMR, 09.12.2015 - 30210/96

    KUDLA ET 204 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE

    41431/98.
  • EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 22088/04

    BRAGADIREANU v. ROMANIA

    The Court also recalls that since the remittal of cases for re-examination is usually ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003).
  • EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 70767/01

    PAVLYULYNETS v. UKRAINE

    Although the Court is not in a position to analyse the quality of the case-law of the domestic courts, it considers that, since the remittal of cases for re-examination is usually ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht