Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 50222/99
- EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
Wird zitiert von ... (85) Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 10.07.1984 - 8990/80
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
While not disregarding the inevitable delay stemming from this reform, the Court notes that the States have a general obligation to organise their legal systems so as to ensure compliance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1, including that of trial within a reasonable time (see Guincho v. Portugal, judgment of 10 July 1984, Series A no. 81, p. 16, § 38). - EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01
KROENITZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
Having regard to its finding in relation to Article 6 § 1 (see paragraph 77 above), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Zanghì v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 194-C, p. 47, § 23 and Kroenitz v. Poland, no. 77746/01, § 37, 25 February 2003). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
This investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Assenov and Others, cited above, p. 3290, § 102 and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
On the latter point, what was at stake for the applicant in the litigation has also to be taken into account (see, among many other authorities, Süßmann v. Germany, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, pp. 1172-73, § 48 and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96
KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004). - EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
GÜL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004). - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 30873/96
EGMEZ c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
Also, the injuries were caused during a short period of time, in the course of a police operation for the arrest of suspected offenders, which was apparently accompanied by heightened tension (see paragraph 11 above and Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XII). - EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 23656/94
AYDER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act, which were premised on the strict liability of the authorities and could only result in the award of compensation (see paragraph 45 above), but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered as satisfying the procedural requirements of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaşa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII, İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000, Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001, Avşar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII, and Ayder v. Turkey, no. 23656/94, § 98, 8 January 2004).
- EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05
Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz …
Weitere Faktoren sind u.a. der Zweck, zu dem die Behandlung erfolgte, die dahinterstehende Absicht oder die Beweggründe dafür (vgl. u.a. Aksoy ./. Türkei, 18. Dezember 1996,Rdnr. 64, Berichte 1996-VI; Egmez ./. Zypern, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30873/96, Rdnr. 78, ECHR 2000-XII; und Krastanov ./. Bulgarien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 50222/99, Rdnr. 53, 30. - EGMR, 30.06.2008 - 22978/05
Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Fortwirkung von Verstößen gegen die …
Die Befragung dauerte jedoch nur etwa 10 Minuten und, wie in dem Strafverfahren gegen die Polizeibeamten festgestellt wurde (…siehe Rdnr. 46), fand sie in einer sehr angespannten und emotional aufgeladenen Atmosphäre statt, was darauf zurückzuführen war, dass die völlig erschöpften und unter hohem Druck stehenden Polizeibeamten glaubten, sie hätten nur ein paar Stunden, um J.s Leben zu retten; diese Merkmale können als strafmildernde Faktoren angesehen werden (vgl. Egmez , a.a.O., Rdnr. 78, und Krastanov ./. Bulgarien , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 50222/99, Rdnr. 53, 30. - EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09
BOUYID v. BELGIUM
Further factors include the purpose for which the ill-treatment was inflicted, together with the intention or motivation behind it (compare, inter alia, Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XII; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004; see also, among other authorities, Gäfgen, cited above, § 88; and El-Masri, cited above, § 196), although the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase the victim cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see, among other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX; and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 114).
- EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02
VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).This is so because, if the authorities could confine their reaction to incidents of wilful ill-treatment by State agents to the mere payment of compensation, while not doing enough to prosecute and punish those responsible, it would be possible in some cases for agents of the State to abuse the rights of those within their control with virtual impunity, and the general legal prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment, despite its fundamental importance, would be ineffective in practice (see, among many other authorities, Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 60, 30 September 2004, and mutatis mutandis, Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 74; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV; Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 57, 14 December 2000; Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001; Avsar v. Turkey [GC], no. 25657/94, § 377, ECHR 2001-VII).
- EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 17828/05
[ENG]
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 37679/08
[ENG]
Wilful ill-treatment of persons who are within the control of agents of the State cannot be remedied exclusively through an award of compensation to the victim (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 60, 30 September 2004, and Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 130, 29 July 2010).In respect of persons deprived of their liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by their own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04
ISAYEV v. RUSSIA
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 3933/04
KOPYLOV v. RUSSIA
Any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by the detainee's own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 9297/02
NADROSOV v. RUSSIA
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 5742/02
AKULININ AND BABICH v. RUSSIA
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).The authorities thus had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicants sustained their injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004).
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 33470/03
ANTIPENKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36220/02
BARABANSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 43239/04
RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 75450/12
M.S. v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 28847/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 30033/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04
YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28923/09
AZZOLINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE et 1 autre affaire
- EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04
PREMININY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 14146/02
[ENG]
- EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 1653/13
Spanien verurteilt: ETA-Terroristen unmenschlich behandelt
- EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2017 - 12131/13
Italien verurteilt: Folter durch Polizeigewalt
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02
MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 41250/02
MIRCEA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 19072/08
HABIMI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 32133/11
KUMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 42697/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03
ZELILOF v. GREECE
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 22663/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 20546/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
ELDAR IMANOV AND AZHDAR IMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 72250/01
LOPATA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2012 - 41356/08
BUTOLEN v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 14612/02
WIKTORKO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 1748/02
BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 15526/10
[ENG]
- EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 34140/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 2807/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64418/10
MIHHAILOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
BASENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 16117/02
[FRE]
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 20875/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 36410/02
OLEG NIKITIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 36672/97
KURNAZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 22867/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 8461/03
MOGILAT v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 22485/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 68351/01
DIRI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 49608/08
[FRE]
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 3937/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 10393/04
NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 4390/03
[FRE]
- EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 1926/03
STOJNSEK v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 77092/01
NECDET BULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11
RADU AND RADU-CIUPERCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20212/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 39855/03
PAVLOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 29766/03
KARATEPE AND ULAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 14166/02
ESER CEYLAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 53546/99
HASAN DÖNER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 58497/00
HADJIBAKALOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 44626/98
KIURKCHIAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 34108/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 11014/05
[FRE]
- EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 24460/04
SHANIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 14030/03
SHCHUKIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 17322/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 18293/03
PELECKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02
ZHOVTAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 51083/09
REILLY v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 38047/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 74137/01
ILIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 34027/03
DUR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 47905/99
RASHID c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 21533/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 77147/01
KUYUMDZHIYAN v. BULGARIA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV CONTRE LA BULGARIE ET 16 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV AGAINST BULGARIA AND 16 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 34805/02
- EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02, 51284/09, 69138/01, 18059/05, 31365/02, 61275/00, 53121/99, 55061/00, 50222/99, 7888/03, 46317/99, 57883/00, 47905/99, 14383/03, 42027/98, 48130/99, 43531/08
Wird zitiert von ... (24) Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 19/05
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
19/05/2004. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
16/04/2013. - EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99
IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
48130/99.
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.07.2007 - 15/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
15/04/2009. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 07.10.2005 - 18/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
18/04/2006. - VK Niedersachsen, 29.10.2002 - 23/02
Leistungsbeschreibung: bei Unklarheiten in den Verdingungsunterlagen ist der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
23/02/2006. - EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
43531/08. - EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 14383/03
SASHOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
14383/03. - EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31365/02
GEORGI DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
31365/02. - EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 61275/00
VLADIMIR GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.02.2019 - 34805/02
61275/00. - EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 55061/00
KAZAKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 51284/09
GEORGIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 18059/05
[FRE]
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 36629/10
SABA c. ITALIE
Parmi les autres facteurs à considérer figurent le but dans lequel le traitement a été infligé ainsi que l'intention ou la motivation qui l'ont inspiré (Aksoy c. Turquie, 18 décembre 1996, § 64, Recueil 1996-VI ; Egmez c. Chypre, no 30873/96, § 78, CEDH 2000-XII ; et Krastanov c. Bulgarie, no 50222/99, § 53, 30 septembre 2004), ou encore son contexte, telle une atmosphère de vive tension et à forte charge émotionnelle (Selmouni c. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 104, CEDH 1999-V, et Egmez, précité, § 78).D'abord, d'importants facteurs pour que l'enquête soit effective, et qui permettent de vérifier si les autorités avaient la volonté d'identifier et de poursuivre les responsables, sont la célérité avec laquelle elle est ouverte (Selmouni, précité, §§ 78-79 ; Nikolova et Velitchkova c. Bulgarie, no 7888/03, § 59, 20 décembre 2007 ; et Vladimir Romanov, précité §§ 85 et suiv.) et la célérité avec laquelle elle est conduite (Mikheïev c. Russie, no 77617/01, § 109, 26 janvier 2006, et Dedovski et autres c. Russie, no 7178/03, § 89, CEDH 2008).
- EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 44883/09
[FRE]
Parmi les autres facteurs à considérer figurent le but dans lequel le traitement a été infligé ainsi que l'intention ou la motivation qui l'ont inspiré (voir, entre autres, Aksoy c. Turquie, 18 décembre 1996, § 64, Recueil 1996-VI, Egmez c. Chypre, no 30873/96, § 78, CEDH 2000-XII, et Krastanov c. Bulgarie, no 50222/99, § 53, 30 septembre 2004 ; El Masri, précité, § 196 et Al Nashiri, précité, § 508). - EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31365/02
GEORGI DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
De même, dans le domaine des opérations programmées de la police, les autorités ont l'obligation de prendre des mesures appropriées de nature à minimiser les dommages pour toutes les personnes concernées (voir, mutatis mutandis, Rehbock c. Slovénie, no 29462/95, § 72, CEDH 2000-XII, ainsi que Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, § 51, 18 janvier 2007).Les autorités avaient donc l'obligation de prendre les mesures nécessaires pour procéder à cette arrestation de façon à minimiser les dommages pour toutes les personnes concernées (Kurnaz et autres c. Turquie, no 36672/97, § 55, 24 juillet 2007, et Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, § 51, 18 janvier 2007), ce qu'elles n'ont apparemment pas fait.
- EGMR, 19.04.2012 - 49382/06
[ENG]
The Court reiterates its case-law according to which a State is directly responsible for acts of violence committed by police officers in the performance of their duties (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004). - EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 42250/02
CALMANOVICI c. ROUMANIE
La Cour rappelle que, pour examiner le délai d'exécution d'un jugement de mise en liberté, elle n'a pas écarté des périodes telles que le soir et la nuit dans d'autres affaires où les conditions requises pour la mise en liberté du requérant avaient été réunies à une heure où l'employé de la prison chargé de certaines opérations nécessaires à cette fin était absent en raison de ses horaires de travail (voir Labita, précité, §§ 24 et 172, et Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, §§ 31-32 et 79-80, 18 janvier 2007). - EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 5576/19
CEYHAN c. TURQUIE
Dans pareilles situations, la Cour a déjà déclaré qu'il ne pouvait être remédié à une atteinte au droit à la vie par le seul octroi de dommages-intérêts (Nikolova et Velitchkova c. Bulgarie, no 7888/03, §§ 56-57, 20 décembre 2007, Leonidis c. Grèce, no 43326/05, §§ 46-48, 8 janvier 2009, Amaç et Okkan c. Turquie, nos 54179/00 et 54176/00, §§ 32 et 35, 20 novembre 2007, Alkın, précité, §§ 30 et 31, et Oruk, précité, §§ 65 et 66). - EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 24708/03
[FRE]
La Cour rappelle que, lorsqu'elle a examiné le délai d'exécution des décisions de remise en liberté de requérants dans des affaires où les conditions requises pour leur libération avaient été réunies à une heure où l'employé de la prison chargé des opérations nécessaires à cette fin était absent en raison de ses horaires de travail, elle n'a pas écarté des périodes telles que le soir et la nuit (Labita, précité, §§ 24 et 172, Rashid c. Bulgarie, no 47905/99, §§ 31-32 et 79-80, 18 janvier 2007, et Calmanovici, précité, § 77). - EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 29447/04
[ENG]
The applicant's complaint in this regard is therefore "arguable", which means that the authorities had an obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which the applicant sustained his injuries (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria , no. 50222/99, § 58, 30 September 2004). - EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 21449/04
CELNIKU c. GRECE
La Cour considère que cette omission de la part des agents de l'Etat n'est pas négligeable, car elle a empêché l'enquête administrative de déterminer des éléments importants, tels que la position de la victime lorsque le coup de feu fatal a été déclenché (voir, en ce sens, Ognyanova et Choban c. Bulgarie, no 46317/99, § 111, 23 février 2006). - EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 76035/11
AKÇAYÖZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
À cet égard, elle rappelle ce qui est de jurisprudence constante: dans les affaires où il est allégué que la mort a été infligée volontairement, l'octroi d'une indemnité ne saurait dispenser les États contractants de leur obligation de mener des investigations pouvant conduire à l'identification et à la punition des responsables (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Tanrıkulu c. Turquie [GC], no 23763/94, § 79, CEDH 1999-IV, Salman c. Turquie [GC], no 21986/93, § 83, CEDH 2000-VII, Nikolova et Velitchkova c. Bulgarie, no 7888/03, § 55, 20 décembre 2007, ainsi que les références qui y figurent, et Al-Skeini et autres c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 55721/07, § 165, CEDH 2011). - EGMR, 05.05.2015 - 1454/09
[FRE]
- EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 77832/12
TOKUR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 74941/12
ISIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 37474/20
CANI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29612/09
MARTYNETS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 23307/10
TURSUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 26765/05
OPREA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 3832/06
[FRE]
- EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 73346/11
ÖZÇELIK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 70932/10
ALKAYA v. TURKEY and 7 other applications
- EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 40528/11
GÖRMÜS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 57883/00
VASIL PETROV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR - 20004/18 (anhängig)
ALOSA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE ET ALLEMAGNE
- EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 59142/16
LAZARIDOU c. GRÈCE
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 50222/99 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 50222/99
- EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".